Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AirPods Max Still Lack H2 Chip Following Minor Update With USB-C Port and New Colors
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
here's a question, will these play audio through the usb-c? Because, with the other ones, you couldn't. i tried, I used the official apple lightning to aux cable for an ipod and i got nothing. So maybe if i used a usb-c to aux cable i should be able to use these with an ipod. Also another question will these works via a wire with zero battery power?
An incremental update for sure, but why would Apple do more? For one, APMs have not been lucrative for Apple. For another, almost every comparison review out there--think Bose QC Ultra or Sony XM5 vs APM--ends with APMs on top! Aside to the relative discomfort and lack of USB-C, most reviewers prefer the "old" APM to the latest from Sony and Bose.
And, yes, I preordered a set. The mesh has stretched out on my old set, an ear pad replacement is long overdue, and it’s the last tech I have that doesn’t use USB-C.
And, yes, I preordered a set. The mesh has stretched out on my old set, an ear pad replacement is long overdue, and it’s the last tech I have that doesn’t use USB-C.
Last edited by a moderator:
The noise cancellation is already good enough IMO. Its shocking how good these are. I wear mine for 8-10 hours a day, even outside doing yard work and the noise cancellation is so great already.
I agree with you though that there really isn't that much that they need to do for these. I think its just the internet being the internet. Apple did not update their Airpods Pro 2 despite it being their most popular ever!
I have used alternatives to Airpods Max. They are not MASSIVELY better. They are not even SLIGHTLY better. I prefer the weight and feel of the Airpods Max. I prefer the material for the cushions as I cannot....CANNOT do the fake/real leather type of cushions for more than 20 minutes or so, it REALLY irritates my skin. I regularly swap out my ear cushions so I need them easily changeable, I go through about 5 cushions in a week (just rotating them while cleaning them).
Seems to be impacting ALL of Apple's high end products. I am disappointed that I will be waiting until mid-2025 by current rumors for my upgrade for the Mac Studio/Pro.
It is just the internet being the internet. I don't know why age matters on HEADPHONES. I still have really hardcore audiophile friends that still used 10+ year old headphones.
What is the OMG AMAZING feature NEEDED with the H2 chip? Every other post is complaining about the chip. This isn't like an Intel processor where it is 4 generations old. I just don't understand what is so absolutely critical with the H2 chip.
This is from someone that wears the Airpods Max for 8-10 hours every single day. The noise cancellation is VERY GOOD....good enough for yard work, construction nearby, etc.
In my view the Airpods Max sounds WAY BETTER than the Airpods Pro 2.....despite it having the "OMG AMAZING H2 CHIP...MAX NEEDS IT NOW NOW NOW.
Have they fixed this? I have never put mine in the case after 4 years of usage. And I use them for 8-10 hours a day (with breaks and things between). I just charge them when I sleep and I get a full day out of them.
HIGHLY debatable....The current alternatives do not sounds better than the Airpods Max. Maybe if I concentrate VERY HARD I can tell a SLIGHT difference. But not really worth it IMO. Until competitors change their ear cushion material I will keep using the Airpods Max by default. It is the only one I find comfortable for 8-10 hours of daily usage. I have very sensitive skin and the other materials just won't work. I even cycle through 4-5 different pairs of ear cushions with my Max every week. Cleaning them as I cycle, so I need something that is easy to swap.
I do not think it has changed. The headphones sleep immediately they are put in the case, but only sleep after some time (not sure how much) when not put in the case. I do know that I need to charge them more frequently if I do not put them in the case. Generally I can charge them weekly with my usage when I put them in the case, but I need to recharge after a couple of days if I do not put them in the case (I also have a 3rd party case that provides the magnet used to trigger the sleep mode). It would seem to be simple to solve by having a sleep mode switch on the headphones so I do not have to remember to put them in the case. Press to sleep, press to wake up. Anyway Apple have chosen not to provide this option, along with the restriction that you can only use Airplay to connect to your music. Both significant feature shortcomings. The sound quality is very very good and the quality of the build etc. exemplary. Those they can leave alone for me. Anyway I will not be buying a new pair to get a USB C connector, that would be completely pointless to me.
I've had both. I prefer the APM when comparing MSRP price points. The QC Ultra at sub $300 into the low 200s price point would be fine. They are good headphones but just not worth the MSRP price point. Same with APM as well. The biggest benefit of the APM is the Apple connectivity and ease of switching devices. The QC Ultra gives you two devices and it's pretty decent at switching between the two. They definitely did not feel premium or have an amazing build quality, just a slightly better version of the QC II. I'm not saying the APM is some incredible device either, but I do appreciate the apple device connectivity and ease of use. Many people will find similar usage from the beats studio pros (arguably better), but I do appreciate the premium feel of the APM.
Also, ANC for QC Ultra on flights was fantastic. The sound quality on them for everything else was meh (which is why they weren't worth it for me). I would take the B&W Px9 over the QC Ultra. And the only reason the APM beats the Px9 for me is the apple connectivity and the ANC is better.
So, comparing the old page to the new page, neither one indicates explicitly that they can be used wired, but if one purchased the lightning to 3.5mm cable, you could. It works with every device with a standard headphone jack that I’ve plugged into. There’s no cable currently on the store that’s USB-C/headphone, but it could appear on the day of release, we’ll see.
Which iPod did you get nothing with?
I tried it with a 7th gen iPod classic and older. I also used the official Apple made lighting to aux cable. So we shall see with this model. Because unlike a lot of people, I feel these headphones didn’t need a big update. But for the price, I do want to be able to listen to music on anything wired even when the headphones are completely drained.
If it didn’t work before with lightning to 3.5mm, I wouldn’t expect it to work with a future USB-c to 3.5mm as they’ll likely build it using the same specifications.
Well we’ll see. I’ll either buy one and see it for myself or bring the iPod to the store and try the demo out. One way or the other I’ll find out.
Of course they didn't add the new chip. They have to wait until next year to do that so they can milk more people after the grandiose over exaggerated release. Im really getting sick of this company. The only thing keeping them going is these annual releases with minor updates.. nothing revolutionary
True that but the same accounts for the competition and can be observed in most industries that have plateaued.