I sure hope they release new routers. Hopefully at a more competitive price too. I've gone through a few routers is the last month trying to find a reliable one.
To the person who suggested that iTV will also be a wireless router, consider this: If iTV is also a router, you would have to route a ethernet cable to it from your modem, defeating the purpose of wirelessly streaming media to iTV from your Mac/PC. I am willing to bet that iTV will not be a router. You want to put money on it?![]()
We will find out soon!
yes that will be very important. Did apple do that in the past when upgrading to new wireless standards?I really hope they include a user-installable 802.11n Airport card for those of us with pre-intel machines.
**** i just bought a airport extreme yesterday and im loving the wirless music functin.
Luckily i went to my favorite computer store COMPUSA and their return policy is one of the best.
Cant wait tomorrow is not coming fast enough.
$10 says what is in the Pre-N iMacs, MBP, MB, and Mac Pros match whatever intel is releasing.
Thats just the thing. Apple has released models with BOTH chipsets. The iMac has a Broadcom chipset, whereas the MacBook and MacBook Pro have Atheros chipsets. Two different sides of the aisle.
CompUSA is a tool. I bought my very first PowerMac there in the mid 90's and what a frickin horrible experience I had. Not one person in the Mac Dept knew a damn thing. Before the one in Syracuse closed this past fall, all I would buy there was software that the Apple Store upstairs might not have had.
An 802.11n router, with two or four GigE ports even, should not be costing more than $100 at the point of sale. It's probably a single chip solution! The current Airport is overpriced and needs rebooting every month - something my nice reliable Linksys at home has never required.
The problem with wireless is that unless you have perfect reception you will connect at a far lower speed than the figure on the box. For example you most likely connect at 11mbps or 22mbps on a 54mbps wireless network (which is okay for most things, and the network is shared anyway). You can stream compressed HD video at 22mbps - not Bluray or HDDVD quality HD though, only CATV HD quality. 802.11n will mean more connections at >>22mbps which will aid in streaming greatly, even in larger houses with many barriers and multiple wireless clients contending for the bandwidth.
To put this more clearly since it's out.
The X2 replaces the Airport Extreme card that goes in your Mac.
Folks with Core2 Duo iMacs,MacBook Pro's and MacPro's don't need to worry.A firmware update makes it .n. or X2.
The X4 replaces the Airtunes/Airport Base station.Difference is it has Ethernet/HDMI/Component Video/Toslink interface/USB and mini-jack for stereo.And it's the MacMedia Center aka iTV.This being the X4 because it needs more bandwidth/range to accommodate all the peripheral devices that pass through it.
I'm guessing there will be a dongle from Apple for the "pre-pre-n" Macs like the rev A MacBook.
just wild,rampant,insane,16 hours till keynote speculation mind you![]()
I think X2 and X4 just relate to streamlining the name of the base-stations available.
X2 will be the equivalent of the current Airport Express - plug-in, 2 Ethernet ports, USB port, stereo-out port.
X4 will be the equivalent of the current Airport Extreme Base-station - seperate unit, 4 Ethernet ports, 2 USB ports and adding stereo-out to match the Express's streaming capabilities.
Makes perfect sense...most people will only need the X2 variant, and those with small offices etc and a few machines on a wired network will choose the X4 version.
Wireless networking is about to undergo major changes, with 802.11n, or Airport Extreme X2 and X4.
And to think... the current Airport Extremes have been out LONGER than the iSights....
Make it banana shapped and also a skype phone....
why is faster networking stuff exciting for most consumers? It frankly isn't. Even on my G network, you can easily stream divx/h264 video as long as it isn't HD. Hell, even then it's not so stuttery as long as it's encoded in h264. But that's besides the point. The only thing that 99% of people even use a wireless network for is to surf the internet, and as someone has mentioned, that isn't improved at all by this. They might sell some units, but a $400 router that doesn't add much functionality isn't gonna move a lot of units.
I
To the person who suggested that iTV will also be a wireless router, consider this: If iTV is also a router, you would have to route a ethernet cable to it from your modem, defeating the purpose of wirelessly streaming media to iTV from your Mac/PC. I am willing to bet that iTV will not be a router. You want to put money on it?![]()
I think that's the answer! For the older machines without N cards, you can buy a combo iSight/Wireless-N in one unit. It's the perfect combination, as it places the wireless antenna up high, for better range/less interferance to the router, and you only have one Firewire cord to plug in for both.
Based on a quick read of this,
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/802dot112/chapter/ch15.pdf
it seems that the X2 and X4 monikers refer to whether the channels are 20 MHz (legacy 802.11) or 40 MHz wide. There are two main draft approaches to 802.11n: WWiSE or TGnSync. Although Apple may not be taking sides yet, I'd guess they are with the TGnSync camp, as this group is pushing for the use of 802.11n as a way to stream HDTV or DVD content. Also, Intel is part of this consortium.
Anyhow, with 20 MHz channels both drafts achieve top speeds around 135/140 Mbps, which is a little over 2X the speed of 802.11g (54 Mbps, ignoring the turbo stuff). However, if the channels are 40 MHz wide, then bandwidth effectively doubles and top speeds are up around 270/315 Mbps. 270/135 = 2, justifying the X4 moniker.
rendit
Make it banana shapped and also a skype phone....
![]()
I said it.
It's a wireless router.WDS ?
Hello ?![]()