"In any case, the competition’s short-comings should be the highlight of the article."
"So how does this compare to the competition?"
"Remember all the great anti-tracking features Tile had? No? Oh..."
This is
whataboutism and a kind of logical fallacy that turns me away from engaging in dialog.
The reporter wanted to write an article about Apple, not the competition nor the entire landscape of tracking technology. That's a valid focus (Apple is a very large consumer tech company and this product is new). In doing so they pointed out valid concerns that consumers might be interested to know. Apple can respond to those (with software updates or policy changes) or ignore them. The result is a better informed consumer.