Please show where Apple made an objectively false claim on this.It’s not a balance if Apple are falsely claiming it can’t be used for tracking someone.
I honestly didn’t think THIS many articles could be written about AirTags lol. These things should be simple, but I’m more confused than ever as to how exactly they do/don’t work.
I bought the 4 pack and am very good with my stuff luckily, but man… too much chatter about these tiny things.
Correct. Why is WaPo bashing Apple when, like you said, Amazon has all kind of devices to stalk someone. Maybe WaPo needs to do a story on its parent company about stalking devices instead.Give me a break. This is sensationalism at its best. Go to Amazon and type in “spy tracking GPS” and you’ll get a myriad of products specifically built for the purpose of stalking people.
But that’s not sexy and isn’t made by Apple, so let’s write an article about AirTags instead, which already have a host of protections those other products don’t.
Cool, cool.It’s not a balance if Apple are falsely claiming it can’t be used for tracking someone.
You know you make a statement about lost and stolen items. I have seen a lot of comments saying AirTags are not for locating stolen items, only lost. This is not directed at you by no means but what would be the difference if you sat your back pack down walked off and forgot about it (lost item) versus you are sitting at your favorite outdoor diner and some dude on a bike rides by and steals your back pack (stolen) Either way you want your item back I am just not understanding why some people say they are only for lost items and not for stolen items.I totally disagree with the article. There is already too much anti-stalking bias in the design of AirTags, making the design too pro-thief. I want a tag that is useful in helping me track my stolen property and get it back. That means the tag should not alert the thief that it is there, perhaps hidden in a bag pocket or sewn into it. I also want an easy mechanism to temporarily give law enforcement the ability to track the tag until they successfully recover the stolen item.
Apple has not claimed that their privacy features prevent someone using it to stalk someone. All they have said is they have built this feature to help prevent, which is more than Tile or anyone else has done in that regard.It’s not a balance if Apple are falsely claiming it can’t be used for tracking someone.
You know you make a statement about lost and stolen items. I have seen a lot of comments saying AirTags are not for locating stolen items, only lost. This is not directed at you by no means but what would be the difference if you say your back pack down walked off and forgot about it (lost item) versus you are sitting at your favorite outdoor diner and some dude in a bike rides by and steals your back pack (stolen) Either way you want your item back I am just not understanding why some people say they are only for lost items and not for stolen items.
Oh okay. Thanks for clarifying that. I just wasn’t sure what the difference was between lost and stolen as that related to AirTags.Because apparently apple has expressed that distinction; that’s why the anti-stalking functions are not a concern to apple. If someone steals your stuff, you don’t want the tag beeping at them so they know it’s tagged and know to ditch the tag. If you lose something, the finder may hear the beeping and can use a smartphone to read the tag and get your contact info. These features make sense for a tag designed for lost items and not for stolen items.
Perhaps that will be something Apple may do. The reason I say that is I doubt Apple would want the bad press if it gets out a lot of Android users are being stalked by AirTags.Apple went to great lengths to make these devices really small and have great range, while also touting the anti-stalking tech. WaPo is right to critique the critical gaps that remain in that anti-stalking tech.
What WaPo highlighted is that a stalker abuser could stuff an air tag in the bottom of their SO’s purse/bag - where any audible chime would be muffled - and if their SO uses android, he/she/they would be likely none the wiser, yet the stalker would have very accurate location data on them. This is largely contrary to Apple’s claims that the device is resistant to stalking.
If Apple is serious about making this more resistant to stalkers, they would work with Google or otherwise provide an app in the Play store that could do android notifications of unknown airtags that “stick” with them.
it doesn't. find my network doesn't compare to the competition.So how does this compare to the competition?
just better headline and more clicks bashing Apple.
Admittedly, I'm not terribly familiar with the Airtag design, but if you recall the Wii controller, it had a built-in speaker that was rather loud. Simply putting tape over the sound holes made a big difference. My point is that if someone is going to be creepy, they might think of a few hacks along the way.It’s easy to muffle while pressing the top! (Um, who is pressing the top to muffle the sound while this attempted stalking is happening. I am very confused)
Apple has not claimed that their privacy features prevent someone using it to stalk someone. All they have said is they have built this feature to help prevent, which is more than Tile or anyone else has done in that regard.
You are wrong. If you want to stalk someone with a tile, the victim would have to install the tile app and allow it to run in the background. With air tags, tracking is built in to the OS and can’t be disabled.
But you can track anyone using another iPhone. I think even Android has this feature.
Actually it can be disabled by turning off the Find My Network