Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yes, it means it can charge faster (with an appropriate charger) and also wear out your battery health faster.

The truth is more complicated. First of all, only two things really degrade your battery apart from time itself: heat and voltage. Ideally, to extend the battery's lifespan you should keep it at ambient temperature (not exceeding 35°C) and around 3.8V all the time.

If you have a device with lets say 15% battery left at around 3.6V.

Slow charging: it will gradually ramp up the battery's voltage and produce little heat over the couple of hours it takes to charge it until it reaches its max at around 4.35V.

Fast charging: it will immediately ramp up the battery's voltage as it reaches 4.35V and produce a lot of heat at first (if the device doesn't thermal throttle the charging itself which happens at around 35–40°C) and then gradually decrease the speed until it will charge as slowly as with a slower charger.

In reality, fast charging lets the battery stay at around 4.35V for longer which usually means like 20–40 minutes up until slow and fast charging have the same speed. Compared to leaving your device plugged in at 100% over night (meaning 4.35V for hours) the impact is negligible. The one thing that does make a huge difference is heat.

The heat output of fast charging can be quite significant. Slowly charging can mean around 30°C while fast charging pushes the battery to a constant 35–40°C. But unless you are in a really hot environment, it will not stay that hot and if it does, it will decrease the charging speed which reduces the voltage and the heat output but also making fast charging not fast anymore.

It all depends on the safe guards manufacturers implement. If you have a phone with 180W fast charging that allows the battery to be at 4.5V until 45°C it is much more damaging. Yet, if the safe guards are activated too quickly, fast charging only works at certain scenarios like cool room temperatures. Fast charging probably is less hurtful to the battery than leaving your device at 100%. The dose makes the poison. Do you want a battery that lasts for 10 years but at 40% capacity or one that lasts a months at 2x capacity? [I'm just exaggerating here, not actual numbers or even safely possible]


Apple's Viewpoint

Apple's viewpoint probably is that faster charging is not a priority if users are primarily charging at night while the battery lasts a full day. Fast charging could mean batteries having less than 80% capacity within 2 years making it eligible for a warranty claim and lastly, if fast charging is throttled due to thermals, people would complain that it doesn't work. I'm guessing if at all, Apple will enable it on beta builds to evaluate. Probably also a reason they improved the cooling system.

Those new A18 chips are based on TSMC's N3E with higher yields and more efficiency compared to the A17 N3B. So the new chips should run cooler than before yet Apple improves the heat dissipation. Their new cooling design might very well be part of keeping the battery cool for improved fast charging. Killing two birds with one stone: keeping the battery cool while keeping the SoC even cooler.
 
Last edited:
The truth is more complicated. First of all, only two things really degrade your battery apart from time itself: heat and voltage. Ideally, to extend the battery's lifespan you should keep it at ambient temperature (not exceeding 35°C) and around 3.8V all the time.

If you have a device with let's say 15% battery left at around 3.6V.

Slow charging: it will gradually ramp up the battery's voltage and produce little heat over the couple of hours it takes to charge it until it reaches its max at around 4.35V.

Fast charging: it will immediately ramp up the battery's voltage as it reaches 4.35V and produce a lot of heat at first (if the device doesn't thermal throttle the charging itself which happens at around 35–40°C) and then gradually decrease the speed until it will charge as slowly as with a slower charger.

In reality, fast charging let's the battery stay at around 4.35V for longer which usually means like 20–40 minutes up until slow and fast charging have the same speed. Compared to leaving your device plugged in at 100% over night (meaning 4.35V for hours) the impact is negligible. The one thing that does make a huge difference is heat.

The heat output of fast charging can be quite significant. Slowly charging can mean around 30°C while fast charging pushes the battery to a constant 35–40°C. But unless you are in a really hot environment, it will not stay that hot and if it does, it will decrease the charging speed which reduces the voltage and the heat output but also making fast charging not fast anymore.

It all depends on the safe guards manufacturers implement. If you have a phone with 180W fast charging that allows the battery to be at 4.5V until 45°C it is much more damaging. Yet, if the safe guards are activated too quickly, fast charging only works at certain scenarios like cool room temperatures. Fast charging probably is less hurtful to the battery than leaving your device at 100%. The dose makes the poison. Do you want a battery that lasts for 10 years but at 40% capacity or one that lasts a months at 2x capacity? [I'm just exaggerating here, not actual numbers or even safely possible]


Apple's Viewpoint

Apple's viewpoint probably is that faster charging is not a priority if users are primarily charging at night while the battery lasts a full day. Fast charging could mean batteries having less than 80% capacity within 2 years making it eligible for a warranty claim and lastly, if fast charging is throttled due to thermals, people would complain that it doesn't work. I'm guessing if at all, Apple will enable it on beta builds to evaluate. Probably also a reason they improved the cooling system.

Those new A18 chips are based on TSMC's N3E with higher yields and more efficiency compared to the A17 N3B. So the new chips should run cooler than before yet Apple improves the heat dissipation. Their new cooling design might very well be part of keeping the battery cool for improved fast charging. Killing two birds with one stone: keeping the battery cool while keeping the SoC even cooler.
Thanks for the amazing summary.

Leaving your iPhone plugged in overnight is really detrimental to battery health.
 
At the same time charging at 45w the battery will be nice and toasty.

I'll be sticking with my 5w charger thanks.
I've been using 45w charging with Samsung products for years inside of an Otterbox case and have not observed any loss or damage. Its enough to get you to 65% or so quickly then the rest is like 25w and dips from there. From 0% to 100% happens in about 70 minutes.

The battery is not charging at 45w the entire time.
 
For a data point. I use 5w wired charger on the night stand overnight. Fast charge wired otherwise to pick up around 20-30% maybe 3-4x a week. Battery at 91% max capacity on launch day 12 pro. Will continue with this on launch day 16 pro.
 
Honestly the most exciting feature of the new lineup, for me at least. I would like to see even higher wattage charging than this but it’s a good step in the right direction
 
Glad to see faster wired and MagSafe charger. Surprised to see that there is no 45w power adapter from Apple. Only 30w, 35w and then 70w.
 
Kinda odd that the iPhone comparison page and the iPhones 16 product pages don’t mention a single thing about these new charging speeds:
IMG_3865.jpeg

I don’t see anything new about charging besides faster MagSafe charging.

And in what scenario is Apple hiding a sales argument for a new product?

This doesn’t make a lot of sense.

Unless there’s some certification that Apple hasn’t cleared yet or something?
 
Wow, that's exciting news! I'm really excited to hear that all iPhone 16 models now support up to 45W of wired fast
charging. It's great to see Apple continuing to improve their devices' charging capabilities. Can't wait to get my hands on one of these new iPhones!
 
The two Anker chargers I have (543 charging station and 735 wall charger) and an Aukey charger have 20 watt USB-C charging connections. I should be able to charge my new iPhone 16 Plus reasonably fast with just only 20 watts initial charging rate.

(But one question though: will my new iPhone charge from a USB-A 12 watt/2.4 ampere charge with a USB Type A to USB Type C cable?)
 
Has anyone tested the new iPhones. Do you notice a difference if you plug it into a 45 watts compatible power adapter?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.