Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is a very compelling upgrade. The color blue is beautiful. Ready to get my hands on it. Apple, please take my money already.

View attachment 1831437

My concern with the blue is that it’s such a light color that after a time with it your eyes will adjust and start processing it as “cold white”. Especially if you put a case on it and just have that camera part visible.

That’s why I like the silver, nice and neutral to not distract from a colorful case.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ModusOperandi
There’s little advantage to shoot in PR proxy or LT, I guess it might be shooting in PR raw or something new. Shooting in HEVC 10 bits with a higher bitrate is probably more useful than LT/Proxy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foliovision
We are so fortunate to have this "pocket" technology. My father introduced me to photography and dark room developing when I was 10 years old, in the early 1960's. My first "serious" camera was a pre-war (WWII) Leica. I took some amazing photos. However, photography then was a thoughtful process. It took a lot of experience to know your film types, your camera, and your darkroom processes. Mistakes were made, negatives ruined, timing ruined composition, so many ways to lose your "focus".

Many accolades to the engineers who have transformed amateur film photography into professional ranked results. Incredible work! Thank you.
I agree. Not to forget that we did not get many chances. A couple of shots and with no preview and hope for the best. It was an expensive and time consuming.
 
iPhone 14 Pro unique color will be baby pink, plus the black will change shade slightly. The notch will be the same width but 20% shorter. Cinematic video will support 4k30 and 1080p60. All other rumors in the next year will again be false to expose leaks.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: ModusOperandi
the camera capabilities have me actually now pondering whether I should upgrade from my 11 Pro Max
Oh my, based on some previous posters you're totally wrong: It is definitely NOT a compelling upgrade from 11 Pro (a guess, or 'Max'). LOL.

(This 11P owner will be placing an order tho.)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jz0309
What do you all think about this new “Ceramic Shield” glass. You think screen protectors are gonna be needed still? And if screen protectors are still needed, anyone have a specific one they’d get? Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SantaFeNM
Agree not mad at Apple because they didn’t promise it but the rumors were way off
Same, because I'd like to do this. However, I took photos of the comet in 2019 in Night Mode, and a few others of stars. Not ideal, but you certainly get more stars than are apparent with naked eye in an urban area

Beyond the physical aspects of the iPhones, the rumors seem to have been mostly made up at this point. And the Apple Watch renders! Haha! I hope journalists make note of these guys and of their track records.
 
Oh my, based on some previous posters you're totally wrong: It is definitely NOT a compelling upgrade from 11 Pro (a guess, or 'Max'). LOL.

(This 11P owner will be placing an order tho.)
Well you know, those posters also believe in Prosser and Gurman :eek:o_O:rolleyes:
 
Same, because I'd like to do this. However, I took photos of the comet in 2019 in Night Mode, and a few others of stars. Not ideal, but you certainly get more stars than are apparent with naked eye in an urban area

Beyond the physical aspects of the iPhones, the rumors seem to have been mostly made up at this point. And the Apple Watch renders! Haha! I hope journalists make note of these guys and of their track records.
My gut tells me that some of those “rumors” were planted by Apple…
 
No astrophotography. I was hoping it would be there.
A tiny camera with a tiny lens and sensor is never going to collect enough light in a reasonable amount of time to be useful for astrophotography. Physics just won’t allow it. If you compare a typical smartphone sensor coupled to a 12mm f/1.8 (full frame equivalent lens, actually it is only about 1.9mm focal length due to tiny sized camera) to an actual full frame camera 12mm f/1.8 lens, the full frame lens lets in 39x more light. Imagine looking through a pinhole in a piece of cardboard and comparing that to looking through 1 inch hole in another piece of cardboard. You will see a lot more light looking through the much larger hole. Same thing with cameras. The bigger the hole (aperture opening) the more light that will make it to the sensor. These tiny smartphone lenses just don’t let in enough light. The phone can compensate a little bit through artificially brightening the image through in-camera processing, but not that much, and what they do via this processing lowers the over all image quality. It sounds good in their BS marketing blurbs, but in reality smartphone cameras are terrible in low light situations. If they ever bump the sensor size up to a 1” sensor, then they will be much better, but then the lenses will need to be a lot bigger. So I doubt we will ever see smartphone cameras that do well in low light.
 
Apart from size, it doesn't look like there are any substantive differences between the two Pro models like there were last year. Am I correct?
 
Same, because I'd like to do this. However, I took photos of the comet in 2019 in Night Mode, and a few others of stars. Not ideal, but you certainly get more stars than are apparent with naked eye in an urban area

Beyond the physical aspects of the iPhones, the rumors seem to have been mostly made up at this point. And the Apple Watch renders! Haha! I hope journalists make note of these guys and of their track records.
Using a regular tripod as a static mount for the iPhone 13 won’t really work for taking night sky photos because you would have to leave the shutter open so long that the stars would become very elongated and look like dashed lines rather than points of light. In theory though, you could mount an iPhone 13 to an equatorial tracking mount that will track the stars through the sky and get some decent photos. Unfortunately tracking mounts cost a few hundred dollars and up, plus they require a good bit of knowledge to properly align and use. And even then, the photos would still be from tiny sensors and way less quality and more noisy than from a camera with an APS-C sensor are full frame sensor.
 
I felt it was implied but not stated which made me wonder if the Apple legal team, fearing a mass class action law suit, told them to drop that claim.
There’s a picture on Apple’s site that shows the stars at night in the photo. You might be right. They talked about how great it is in the dark, but only hinted at star photos. I also think it may be a software thing that isn’t ready and may come later this year or next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973 and Seoras
I just looked at their iphone 13 Pro page and all of the Night Mode photos are front lit with artificial light. That is cheating. Duh, shine a light on an object in a dark location, snap a photo, then claim it is due to Night Mode. Total BS. I bet the average iPhone user will never be able to duplicate those professionally taken and studio staged photos. I also bet they took multiple photos for each scene and stacked them for an HDR effect. Not to mention it is a given they had professionals post process them out of camera. Typical marketing BS.
 
1TB :) What are you ordering?
13 mini 256/512GB … pay day is this week.

ooooh wait a minute. No Canadian carrier deals yet, probably next week and I’m on prepaid and credit is a LOT better so the 13 Pro 256GB in Blue just possibly may be an option. Psst don’t tell my Son else he’d take that option away from me. Lol.

we still don’t get IUP in Canada and APR Apple Financing through a 3rd party here is shortened to 6mths now. It’s doable but with third party financing not sure how they will rate me, credit is a very wish washy thing here in Canada.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.