No it's not. Multitasking from a user perspective is doing one task while another is performing in the background (like downloading files or playing music while working on a Word document or browsing the Internet). It has nothing to do with multi-windows.
But then, try to download something in the background and then open another app on iOS on the iPhone. If the download stops up then, then it's no multitasking. Aka what you describe is not possible on iPhones with iOS. So your point is moot.
And no, it's not YOU AS A USER who does the multitasking if you believe the background processes in IOS are considered multitasking for the users. We the users have to do multiple things in the OS at the same time before WE as users can do multitasking. It's about what us users can do and not what the OS has to do to work.
Did you miss the part where this thread is about processors and performance? Why are you trying (failing) to derail the topic to things not related to processors/performance?
Processors and performance is also about the speed if you aren't aware. Because you know, there is no points at all to give the users a new processor if the performance and the speed isn't better, you know?
I can edit 4K video on my 6S. On the S7 you have to find a third party App to do so, and they are terrible. My 6S is way faster at editing a 4K clip then all the Apps I tried on my S7. But feel free to recommend me a 4K editor for Android, and if I haven't already tried it then I'll download it to compare speed.
And what argument was the iOS fanboys using earlier when we said that iOS was missing features and things?
Yes, you said 'there is always an app for that'. Now i'm gonn use that argument against the iOS fanboys on this and say that we also have an app for that, so it's all fine.
I can do real-time transposition on my 5S (which the S7 can't do). That's because the App I use is a native 64bit App and not something written in Java.
Do you have any proofs on that, or are you just dicating up false statements here to defend Apple?
As I already mentioned above (and you missed) the 6S can shoot 1080P at 120FPS. This requires the ability to process a LOT of imaging data in real time. Something a 64bit processor (with the proper software) excels at.
1080p @ 120 fps is a nice thing to have. But i'm afraid 96% of everyone who uses an iPhone doesn't cares about that as most of those are only posting short 10 seconds clips on Snapchat or some short video clips on YouTube or even posting crappy images on Instagram / Facebook anyways.
There is only some very few peoples that cares about 60 and 120 / 240 fps video recording. Those who cares about that are usually making more serious videos to begin with.
Actually, the last video i made was recorded in 4k resolution with 30 fps. Because what i was video recording doesn't need 60 or 120 fps to look good. Infact, here is the video.....
When the iPhone 5S came out within 1 week Algoriddim produced a 64bit App called djay 2. They literally took their 64bit optimized code from their Mac version and were able to port it over to the iPhone. This allowed them to do real-time processing and effects that were not possible on mobile devices previously. To this day, even the S7 version of djay 2 can't do real-time processing that the 5S from 3 years ago could.
I would like to see a proof of that statement when it's about djay 2 on Android.
And this is where iOS has the advantage. Android doesn't have a desktop OS equivalent that people can port their code over from. iOS developers can reuse code from Mac software to bring desktop level features to iOS. Windows developers could also do this. Android can't, because it's a stand-alone system that doesn't have a "parent" desktop OS (and no, Linux doesn't count because Android is so far removed from Linux it's barely recognizable anymore).
This is an advantage for the app developers and no direct advantage for the casual user. Again, see the difference from what the users want's to what the app developers needs.
I'm so sorry you're stuck using the inferior, insecure Android with its Apps written in that kiddie language Java that can't even make use of that 64bit processor you have.
Android is as secure as it can be as long as you are not going outside of the Play Store. It's a proven fact.
Yeah, Android do have some security holes from time to time, but who doesn't?
There doesn't exists an OS that is malware / virus proof anyways.
