Alphabet's Waymo Accuses Uber of Stealing Self-Driving LiDAR System

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
49,668
10,999



Google parent company Alphabet's self-driving Waymo car division today filed a lawsuit [PDF] against Uber, accusing the company of stealing its self-driving intellectual property.

In blog post shared this afternoon, Waymo explains that employees of Otto, a self-driving trucking startup recently acquired by Uber, allegedly stole technical information from Google's autonomous car project, something it equates to "stealing a secret recipe from a beverage company."


Specifically, former Google employee Anthony Levandowski, who co-founded Otto, is accused of stealing 14,000 confidential files that included data on the laser-based radar system used in Waymo vehicles. Waymo conducted a forensic investigation of Levandowski's former computer after accidentally receiving an email of Otto's LiDAR circuit board, which closely resembled Waymo's design.
We found that six weeks before his resignation this former employee, Anthony Levandowski, downloaded over 14,000 highly confidential and proprietary design files for Waymo's various hardware systems, including designs of Waymo's LiDAR and circuit board. To gain access to Waymo's design server, Mr. Levandowski searched for and installed specialized software onto his company-issued laptop.

Once inside, he downloaded 9.7 GB of Waymo's highly confidential files and trade secrets, including blueprints, design files and testing documentation. Then he connected an external drive to the laptop. Mr. Levandowski then wiped and reformatted the laptop in an attempt to erase forensic fingerprints.
According to Waymo, its LiDAR system is "one of the most powerful parts" of its self-driving technology. Waymo's LiDAR system works by bouncing millions of laser beams off of surrounding objects to create a 3D picture of the world for detecting and avoiding objects.

Alongside Levandowski, Waymo says other former employees who now work for Otto and Uber downloaded other confidential files ranging from supplier lists to manufacturing details.

Waymo is asking for an injunction against Otto and Uber to stop the misappropriation of its designs, and it is asking for the return of all trade secret information and for Otto to cease infringing on Waymo patents.

As Google and Uber fight over self-driving car patents in an increasingly competitive market, Apple is rumored to be quietly developing its own autonomous driving system for use in third-party vehicles.

Apple was originally said to be working on its own full-fledged vehicle, but later scaled back its plans and refocused on autonomous driving software after internal staff restructuring. Apple has reportedly given its car team until 2017 to "prove the feasibility" of a self-driving car system.

Article Link: Alphabet's Waymo Accuses Uber of Stealing Self-Driving LiDAR System
 

macfacts

macrumors 68040
Oct 7, 2012
3,838
4,556
Cybertron
Would this be how the iPhone X face recognition is going to work? Using laser based radar on the front of the phone.
 

cariacou

macrumors 6502a
Jul 21, 2010
503
424
"We found that six weeks before his resignation this former employee, Anthony Levandowski, downloaded over 14,000 files"
don't mess with a tech company
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwillwall

Peel

macrumors 6502a
Aug 30, 2004
576
85
Seattle
Interesting that Google waits until someone with bucks (Über) buys out Otto before suing them.
 

szw-mapple fan

macrumors 68000
Jul 28, 2012
1,905
1,617
Waymo conducted a forensic investigation of Levandowski's former computer after accidentally receiving an email of Otto's LiDAR circuit board, which closely resembled Waymo's design.
That is just the most reckless email mistake ever. You would think a company would lock down information that it stole from someone else.

Or, a Google loyalist "accidentally" leaked it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,461
14,021
In between a rock and a hard place
Interesting that Google waits until someone with bucks (Über) buys out Otto before suing them.
The reasoning is right in the story.
Waymo conducted a forensic investigation of Levandowski's former computer after accidentally receiving an email of Otto's LiDAR circuit board, which closely resembled Waymo's design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley and Lazy

szw-mapple fan

macrumors 68000
Jul 28, 2012
1,905
1,617
Interesting that Google waits until someone with bucks (Über) buys out Otto before suing them.
Otto only existed as a company for 3 months before being acquired by Uber (May to August 2016). Seems pretty suspicious to me.
 

Bart Kela

Suspended
Oct 12, 2016
865
593
Searching...
I thought the accidental email that tipped them off was in December, after they were bought by Uber?
Correct. Your reading comprehension is better than Peel's.

The recent e-mail triggered the investigation which eventually led to the uncovering of Anthony Levandowski's surreptitious document downloading behavior six weeks prior to his Google departure.

Crimes can be solved after they have occurred; people are not always caught red-handed. Peel failed to understand this very basic concept.

You don't need to be caught with your hand in the cookie jar to be unveiled as a cookie thief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley

Aston441

macrumors 68000
Sep 16, 2014
1,543
2,222
Is anyone looking into whether all these often invisible lasers starting to bounce around our everyday environments have the potential to cause retinal damage? If not immediately, how about cumulatively?
 

gnasher729

macrumors P6
Nov 25, 2005
17,127
4,147
Interesting that Google waits until someone with bucks (Über) buys out Otto before suing them.
Obviously Google waits until there is damage caused, and until there is damage caused by someone with deep pockets. That's what any reasonable company would do. Uber might end up paying for all of Google's development cost.
Otto only existed as a company for 3 months before being acquired by Uber (May to August 2016). Seems pretty suspicious to me.
If someone steals Google's trade secret (no idea if this is what happened or not, therefore the If), then Google absolutely has the right to make the most of it. They don't have any obligation to take someone to court while it is cheap. They have no obligation whatsoever, neither legal nor ethical, to keep the cost to Uber low. Google has the obligation towards its shareholders to maximise profits, including at the expense of someone illegally stealing trade secrets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkeeley

GrumpyMom

macrumors G3
Sep 11, 2014
8,914
12,785
They may be able to steal its LiDAR system, but I'll be damned if anybody is able to make a car as cute as that.

View attachment 689892
Seriously. I feel the compulsion to throw a Pokeball at it.
[doublepost=1487957499][/doublepost]
Uber is the Bain of my driving existence. Their drivers are reckless always stopping in the middle of the street and making random turns that indicate they have no idea where they are going.
People have always driven like that around here since the advent of GPS's. I've often wondered what weird inexplicable instructions their devices were spewing at them, because goodness knows my GPS's have pulled that crap on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngerDanger

geenosr

macrumors regular
Sep 3, 2007
129
84
South
We all know that it's clear google knows everything about us, and now we know that they can get everything on its (ex) employees too! They really should be the last place someone should try and steal proprietary information from.....
 

Eorlas

macrumors 6502a
Feb 10, 2010
729
1,198
Clearly Uber has not had a very good week
Uber in general doesn't have a good rep. They're not known for paying their drivers well, they're under investigation for padding the ads for salary estimates, now they've got a former employee claiming essentially an entire HR department is run by some of the scummiest people known to the business, and then this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tycho24

cmwade77

macrumors 65816
Nov 18, 2008
1,057
1,168
The reasoning is right in the story.
The reasoning isn't really obvious in the story, but the linked blog post does explain it.
[doublepost=1487974095][/doublepost]
You mean by subverting government enforced monopolies?
Yeah, unfortunately many people don't understand how Taxi companies prices are often set by city, state and federal lawmakers, which is why the prices get so massively overpriced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miniyou64
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.