They could, but it will raise the cost of the aluminum model, and I can’t imagine to manufacture the Sapphire display is relatively cheap either. I suspect the Ion-X Glass is more than sufficient for the average consumer who wants decent protection, which is also similar to what the iPhone display would be in terms of comparison.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Aluminum Case vs Stainless Steel
- Thread starter ron1990
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They could, but it will raise the cost of the aluminum model, and I can’t imagine to manufacture the Sapphire display is relatively cheap either. I suspect the Ion-X Glass is more than sufficient for the average consumer who wants decent protection, which is also similar to what the iPhone display would be in terms of comparison.
I have a Fenix, which is twice the weight of a SS. You get used to it.
We're talking about something that weighs a 1/10 of a pound and the SS is, what, 10g heavier?
I do agree that the OP should probably get aluminum, put a cover or case on it if damage is the major concern.
The question is whether people who use the watch when they run will notice the difference (10 grams).
In my country there is no support for the apple watch cellular models so I wondering how much it is worth to buy the stainless steel verision.
You could also save 30€ or even 50€ in buying the smaller watch case! Sorry Im freaking out...