You mean thank?Apple didn’t leak anything. Blame poor passwords and social engineering for that one.
You mean thank?Apple didn’t leak anything. Blame poor passwords and social engineering for that one.
It’s also used for allowing guests or friends to get in to your house when you’re not there, or allowing the cleaning person or dog sitter entrance to your house. Not just for delivery people.I heard Amazon is banking on this being convenient for people....I think they are banking on people not having brains anymore. I know I personally get an amazon package a few times a week. I wouldn’t feel comfortable letting a stranger have access to my home when I’m not there, reguardless if there is a camera hooked up. Are people becoming so lazy that they don’t use their brains anymore?
I have a porch with a second locked door to get into the main house so I like the idea of amazon delivering as I could just give amazon access to the porch. The camera system subscription seems expensive to me.
Friends and family is fine. But their big push is delivery. I know I have a new UPS guy every week. Not like I know the dude on a personal level.It’s also used for allowing guests or friends to get in to your house when you’re not there, or allowing the cleaning person or dog sitter entrance to your house. Not just for delivery people.
Between Google, Amazon and Apple, which company has a history of leaking sensitive user information?
Hint: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICloud_leaks_of_celebrity_photos
Not that I would trust any delivery driver with the keys to my house
Between Google, Amazon and Apple, which company has a history of leaking sensitive user information?
Hint: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICloud_leaks_of_celebrity_photos
Not that I would trust any delivery driver with the keys to my house
Porch?Right, which is why these are being announced together. The idea is the camera helps bring with it consumer trust.
If the option was between a TV being delivered inside your house with a camera watching the delivery person that has been verified or leaving it on your porch, I would personally pick the in-home delivery.
If it's a box with a $15 item I'd probably be fine with the item and person staying outside my house.
“Hey, the delivery guy just lost his job!”"Hey, the delivery guy is making a sandwich!!"
Why do none of the articles discussing this new service mention Netgear Arlo, which offers free 7-days of storing clips and zone detection? From what I can tell, it sells just about as well as the other Nest competitors, and feature for feature, offers a way better deal.
That is exactly what it is"In-Home Delivery" sounds like they will pick up something and bring it to you inside your home.
Alexa, have someone bring me my drink from in the fridge.
These services are a lot more trustworthy than the alternatives: random embedded DVR systems with software made in China® with known backdoors.Maybe that‘s just me, but these are exactly the services (Cloud camera) that I wouldn’t trust Amazon with, let alone Google.
I would even feel more comfortable having a Homepod listen in in my living room than Alexa or GA.
And basically giving a key to Amazon Logistics...what could go wrong? Despite the security features...
Or I am just getting old.
“Hey, the delivery guy just lost his job!”
Or you could just buy a FireTV, Roku, etc. it amazing how much better those work with a full featured remote. Way more features available on those versions of the same app (ie. SlingTv) than the AppleTV versions.Wish Amazon would focus on releasing their promised tvOS app instead.
I wanted to love the Arlo Pro, I really did. I tried it for months. But on batteries, the cameras are trash. The resolution is grainy (I have gigabit FiOS, bandwidth isn't an issue), but the biggest problem when running on battery power is that the cameras aren't always on. They turn on when motion is detected or when you wake it up from the app. This is a no-go for me (but totally understandable, otherwise the batteries would be dead quickly). There's also a significant delay compared to Nest cameras. For all of our cameras inside the house those aren't complete deal breakers, but for outside, there's no comparison. The Nest outdoor cam is way, way better (for our purpose). I had outlets installed outside just to switch from the Arlo Pros to the Nest outdoor cameras.A huge difference though is that Arlo and similar cams have no wires at all, and run on batteries. For me this is a huge plus as I can place them just about anywhere. The Cloud Cam, while wifi, still needs to be plugged in for power. The Cloud Cam price is attractive compared to true wireless cams, but not so much against wifi cams that need to be plugged in for power.
Mike