They're most welcome to the Apple/iPhone fanboy-community.
Now with WP7 Mango on great hardware they will finally have a choice between 2 different visions.
They're most welcome to the Apple/iPhone fanboy-community.
Finally a voice of reason in the Apple vs MSFT wars. Remember MSFT once had market cap well over $400 billion in 2000. No company gets to stay No. 1 forever, there are ups and downs. Even in their "down" period the last 5-6 years MSFT has raked in a ton of cash and produced lots of important products. The next 5 years is going to be very rosy for MSFT.
If we exclude apps from the 'content' umbrella, that's true. However it doesn't seem to matter much. While content (specifically music) was crucial for the growth of the iPod, it doesn't matter that much for the iPad and iPhone for which apps are the key; and many apps are actually portals to paid content, which allows to circumvent the absence of an iTunes direct offer in emergent markets.
That's actually what makes the KF and iPad 2 two totally different beasts. The KF might marginally eat Apple's lunch for a little while (in USA) but it seems the intersection between the market segments they're targeting is small. The KF is what matches the moniker "Media-tablet". The iPad is a tablet-computer - I'm not saying that the KF does not have computing-abilities but the product as it's delivered is deliberately stripped-down in order to hinder those abilities.
There's a hope but, personally I don't believe it - unless Android collapses under the legal pressure it's getting.
Anyhow, WP7 itself is almost 1 year old already, I fear its image is now damaged beyond repair.
KingCrimson said:Finally a voice of reason in the Apple vs MSFT wars. Remember MSFT once had market cap well over $400 billion in 2000. No company gets to stay No. 1 forever, there are ups and downs. Even in their "down" period the last 5-6 years MSFT has raked in a ton of cash and produced lots of important products. The next 5 years is going to be very rosy for MSFT.
Honestly I can't understand what Amazon's long term goals are here. They won't make much profit from the Kindle Fire at all, it seems to be just about increasing brand awareness. They'll be lucky if they get back their 100% ROI.
Bernard SG said:Anyhow, WP7 itself is almost 1 year old already, I fear its image is now damaged beyond repair.
Microsoft's market cap is about half of what it used to be yet it's profits have doubled. Why do so many here equate that to going down the drain?
Not that I disagree with that you said here, but I don't see where it's invalidating my analysis, which is:Its true even with regards to apps. For example, while i could work my way around the restrictions, an app like Netflix is not available where i am at. Regionalization of content is always a bitch, regardless who delivers it so to speak.
Second, while impossible to know exactly how the Fire will work, and how Amazon will act, i'd say the overlap is greater than many here seem to think. Not because the ipad is not more capable than the Fire, but because people, in general, do not use the former to its full potential.
Crap analogy: As it were a fancy coffee-maker (CM) that made all sorts of coffee were running circles around everyone else. The CM was truly great, but in reality you (and most others) only drink Americano. Suddenly, a cowboy appears on the horizon, with him, he has the AM - the americano-maker - offering it for sale at only 40% of the CM, while saying: I have some of the best beens in the world! With this AM, you too can have them! Here, the overlap is quite obvious. Where in lies the fundamental difference?
People that actually use an iPhone or a high-end Android handset are happy too...How could its imagine be damaged beyond repair, when the real issue for MSFT is that people do not seem to be aware of its existence at all.
I really dont understand why people fail to admit that people that actually use wp7 seem happy. That people who's first reaction was "Windows, urgh..." quickly come around. That MSFT seems to have made something that seems like a fairly decent in the end.
Amazon not losing money on Fire according to this article..
http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/03/amazo...e-sold-ubm-says-amazon-will-make-50-per-unit/
Uh-oh, watch out iPad (Tim Cook: The iPad Is The Undisputed Best-Selling Tablet In the World), here comes the Kindle Fire. LOL
And this is related to Kindle Fire not selling below cost exactly how?
Everyone appears to have a take on how much one really costs. I am only concerned with how much it costs me.Amazon not losing money on Fire according to this article..
http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/03/amazo...e-sold-ubm-says-amazon-will-make-50-per-unit/
Of course, our lives should revolve around our love of corporations and their profits.It's not. It's a desperate cry for help![]()
http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_new...t-amazon-selling-2000-kindle-fires-every-hour
Report: Amazon selling 2,000 Kindle Fires every hour
Amazon.com
By Todd Bishop, GeekWire.com
Looks like Amazon.com has a hit on its hands, even before its new tablet computer is officially released to consumers.
The Seattle company is selling pre-orders for its new Kindle Fire tablets at a rate of 2,000 an hour, or more than 50,000 per day, according to website Cult of Android, which has gotten its hands on what it describes as internal Amazon inventory documents.
If the report is accurate, and the pace continues, Amazon will have sold 2.5 million Kindle Fires prior to the Nov. 15 launch — outpacing the first month of sales for either the iPad or the iPad 2, according to the site.
Of course, at $199, the high demand isn’t a huge surprise. Based on the sales numbers, it looks like people are willing to overlook the Kindle Fire’s shortcomings compared with the iPad, including the lack of 3G mobile broadband and front-facing camera.
The big question long term is whether Amazon can turn the Kindle Fire into a good thing for its bottom line — making up for the money it’s losing on the hardware through increased sales of movies, music, Amazon Prime subscriptions and e-commerce items.
I think the Kindle Fire is going to be phenomenal this holiday quarter. Probably Amazon will sell every single unit they manufacture, estimated 5 million. Then 1Q 2012 they will be unveiling the full-size Kindle Fire. Probably $299.
Not that I disagree with that you said here, but I don't see where it's invalidating my analysis, which is:
- iPad aims at being the reference device for a post-PC era - it sure remains to be seen if such era will happen or not (I believe it will, but it's just that: a belief with little evidence backing it up). The Kindle Fire is not at all playing into that paradigm;
- iPad is a worldwide phenomenon that's shaking the tech universe, the KF is merely an attempt to build a niche inside a local market.
They're not playing in the same league.
On top of that, I also see a risk for Amazon that the US economical context hurts their KF strategy. Apple manages to grow because it targets the higher income categories that are not notably impacted by the bad economy. Amazon is attacking the tablet market with a low-end offer for the masses but a low-end tablet is still somewhat a luxury and in the KF's case' a cost-generating luxury as far as you won't get anything from it unless you spend and spend and spend for Amazon-distributed content. It's quite likely that people of low to middle income won't be too eager to adopt such predicament. To rebound on your analogy, perhaps the targeted segment will settle for instant coffee, in the current economic woes.
You take the example of Netflix, but the point is that Netflix is not a relevant offer for people in Beijing or even Paris. The service has appeal only for US expats living there as the content is not available in local language. Same for eBooks, hence the debate you were having about the eBooks market in Japan.
On the other hand, I live in some godforsaken exotic place where the iPad is of great value for me because it is a fantastic window of the world outside. My most used apps are actually the free ones, but God knows how much time I spend on the device. It really delivers and I hardly miss the access to the paid-for iTunes content.
People that actually use an iPhone or a high-end Android handset are happy too...
I have never had the chance to have a hands-on with a WP7 phone, so I have no idea how good it is and will refrain to make any comment on its intrinsic qualities (however it has been reported that the first iteration disappointed most observers due to missing features like copy/paste that are really a absolute minimum in a device like that nowadays; that was quite poor execution, as product launches go). Anyway, the key-phrase in your quote below is "fairly decent". That's a no-go; it has to be exceptionally awesome, especially to the extent that Microsoft seems to target the high-end with WP7.
It's also probably a not so bright idea from Microsoft to want to call everything "Windows", moreover when WP7 has technically nothing to do with the OS Windows.
Does anyone know what the Kindle Fire Amazon case looks like? I'm considering placing a pre-order for the Kindle Fire. It seems pretty neat. Also, what about downloading movies? I'd love to be able to watch a movie on the plane, but obviously I can't stream it there. Thanks!
iOS 5 you can not turn off roaming (a feature that was removed at the request of the carriers if you believe what Apple is saying).
Not sure where you got that info but the option to disable roaming still works with AT&T at least for me. I doubt they will remove this option.
It's also probably a not so bright idea from Microsoft to want to call everything "Windows", moreover when WP7 has technically nothing to do with the OS Windows.
Apologies, I meant turning off the 3G. You can turn wifi off but if you wanted to turn 3G off so that you can effectively use the machine as an iPod Touch, you'd have to take the SIM card out. Which is not always easy