Why would my hand be used by someone else? And why would there be a picture of that?
I don't know but it seems to be a surprisingly common problem, especially for politicians.
Why would my hand be used by someone else? And why would there be a picture of that?
Not only NO, but Hell No!
Amazon today launched the Amazon One app, which is designed to allow customers to scan their palms to make device-free purchases at Whole Foods, Panera Bread, and 150 third-party locations in stadiums, airports, fitness centers, and convenience stores.
Prior to the launch of the app, signing up for Amazon One had to be done in a physical location with an Amazon One device. The app lets customers create a profile, take a photo of their palm, and add a payment method. Finishing sign-up will still require an initial interaction with an Amazon One machine.
Amazon One can be used for payment, entry to venues, age verification, and loyalty rewards. The service uses generative AI to match a camera phone photo of a person's palm to near-infrared imagery from an Amazon One scanner.
The AI system is able to pair palm and vein imagery to create a unique, numerical vector representation that is used for identity matching. Amazon says that it is 99.99 percent accurate.
Palm images taken with the app are encrypted and sent to a secure Amazon One domain in the AWS cloud. Amazon says the service is convenient for consumers and businesses, and that it sees many repeat users at Whole Foods. Amazon One can be downloaded from the App Store for free. [Direct Link]
Article Link: Amazon's New App Lets You Scan Your Palm to Pay at Whole Foods, Panera Bread and More
Has anyone made such a claim? Clearly this is just for convenience and nothing more.Who in their right mind would think this is more secure than using a device, especially an apple device with on-device encryption?
So this means for every 10,000 customers, there’s going to be a duplicate match. People are going to be randomly scanning their palms to try to trick the system.Amazon says that it is 99.99 percent accurate.
I've had the same experience. Much more convenient, especially now that they integrated your preferred payment.To be fair, palm print isn't widely used as biometric-based identification. So even if the data gets compromised, it probably isn't all that valuable.
Amazon claims palm prints are 99.9999% accurate, or as accurate as Face ID, vs 99.998% for Touch ID.
Having used Amazon One at Whole Foods, the enrollment process is tedious. It isn't something you want to do when you are holding up the long line. Once enrolled, it takes a bit of effort to scan your hand. But it is still far easier than launching Whole Foods app to scan the QR code and then using Apple Pay to complete the transaction.
I mainly enrolled in Amazon One as I often like to go shopping without a phone (only Apple Watch) and Whole Foods app is not available on Apple Watch.
It's kinda dumb that Amazon One isn't integrated into Whole Foods app though.
Who in their right mind would think this is more secure than using a device, especially an apple device with on-device encryption?
Not sure there's any issue there. If you're in the store and picking items, you're already touching things others have touched. And in any case, you don't touch it, you just hover your hand over it.Considering that COVID is still around and has hospitalized and killed many vulnerable people (elderly, immunocompromized, people with preexisting conditions, etc.) in one of its waves in just the past couple of months alone, its probably not a good idea for many people to be putting the entire surface area of their hand on the same glass surface where many others have done the same. That also applies to the annual flu season.
oh you’re completely right to ask this. i actually set it up the old way, by going to a whole foods location, and it’s clunky as hell. they really should’ve sent a video tutorial because it’s as unintuitive as it gets, and i’ve been a techie since i was a teenager.How could this ever be faster than ApplePay? And what if you have multiple cards? Do you have to make gang signs to pick them?
Who in their right mind would think this is more secure than using a device, especially an apple device with on-device encryption?
Security concerns aside, is scanning your palm to pay that much faster and convenient than using your phone, smart watch or contactless payment card?
Palm scanning makes it possible to pay in an emergency when your devices get stolen or run out of power.
But is it worth it to have your biometric data stored on the internet?
Um, 99.99% accurate means a on in 10,000 chance it will confuse your palm with someone else. If there are a million users, then 100 other people could use your account. And, what does it do with dirty hands, or a ring you happen to wear that day, or if you have a paper cut? How about a picture of your hand used by someone else? It sure isn't as secure as Apple's face recognition software, and that's even without considering how this ends up in the cloud somewhere instead of being kept on device...you can't use it if the internet is down of there's a connection issue.
Seems pretty half baked, with Amazon trying to use "AI" to make it sound a lot smarter than it apparently is.
No thanks. Amazon having my hand print, what could go wrong?