That's been my experience as well. I don't know if DDG is improving; but I can say that Google is getting significantly worse.
Of course, YMMV. I'm probably searching for Unix and coding-related stuff 90% of the time.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Analyst Argues Apple Should Acquire DuckDuckGo Search Engine
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That's been my experience as well. I don't know if DDG is improving; but I can say that Google is getting significantly worse.
Of course, YMMV. I'm probably searching for Unix and coding-related stuff 90% of the time.
Depending on others for content and features doesnt sound like a winning strategy in the long run. Apple is worth Google paying it to have Google search as a default until it isn’t.
Remember Google was not offering turn by turn directions on the iPhone, and that alone made me stick with Android at the time. But getting in late to navigations is better than never. It brought about other features and the upcomoing Apple Tags within it’s privacy concerns.
.
Apple smartly turned to making it’s own chips for it’s phones and computers while some said they it was crazy and they should just stick with Intel, and good thing it ventured out or else my iPad Pro would be thick, run hot, be slow and have terrible batter life.
.
Apple doesnt want to be a commodity device maker getting off-the-shelf software or chips like Android device makers being at the mercy of Google, Intel or anyone else.
Last edited:
I don't see the value to Apple in doing so. Google reportedly pays Apple billions of dollars annually for the right to be the default search engine in Safari on iOS and macOS. DDG's valuation in 2018 was something like 10 million dollars.
Besides, honestly, I worry that Apple would screw it up.
I have tried DuckDuckGo a few times over the years, and never been able to make myself like it. Google always seemed faster and better results, and I’ve been using it for decades.
Also, I use Chrome exclusively and sync everything with a Google account. Simply not using the Google search engine isn’t really going to do much for me…
Also, I use Chrome exclusively and sync everything with a Google account. Simply not using the Google search engine isn’t really going to do much for me…
Why on earth should Apple buy DDG, when they're able to build a search engine from scratch ?!
Get 8 Billion from Google every year or buy DDG for 1 Billion and likely not getting any money from Google anymore....
i'm sure it's a really hard decision for Tim
I tried to switch to DDG a couple of times, but i was never satisfied with the search results.
Sadly google is still a lot better and more consistent.
i'm sure it's a really hard decision for Tim
I tried to switch to DDG a couple of times, but i was never satisfied with the search results.
Sadly google is still a lot better and more consistent.
Apple do not have to buy DDG, they could just make it their default search engine. Building a search engine from scratch is not as simple, though, especially considering Apple’s difficulties with building anything from scratch. Apple Maps is a good example, came out in 2012 and took quite a while to match Google.
Wel, 2012 is way back and everything depends on attitude. When you start with "how to not" the outcome is foreseeable.
I use VPN + DDG to research sensitive topics. Never had any related ads pop up in my fb or on amazon etc. Very satisfied.
I have DuckDuckGo as my default browser on my Mac and my iPhone, but I always end up going to Google manually first to do my searches. DDG is nowhere near as accurate with regards to geographic results as Google is. I would not say that's necessarily a weakness, but it is a downside of their increased privacy measures. I frequently have to be more specific in my searches about the area that I'm choosing to search in to get the results that I want.
And for the record, I use Private browsing windows 99% of the time on both devices, so there's no cookies keeping track of my travels. Google still manages to present far more relevant results.
And for the record, I use Private browsing windows 99% of the time on both devices, so there's no cookies keeping track of my travels. Google still manages to present far more relevant results.
no, the article said that the only real leverage Apple has in negotiations against google is bing - the other choices don’t really frighten google enough into making google offer up more money. “pay us more or we’ll make DDG the default” is sort of like threatening to shoot yourself in the foot.
There was an initiative to build up an European privacy oriented search engine, unfortunately the project died before was fully functional. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaero
As the EU is starting the Gaia-X cloud project, maybe someone can catch the idea again. The financing is not a problem as they can found the project with the billions fines from Google
As the EU is starting the Gaia-X cloud project, maybe someone can catch the idea again. The financing is not a problem as they can found the project with the billions fines from Google
Apple has more money than they know what to do with. If you don’t like their dramas, don’t watch them but not having original content won’t get you your magic touch screen laptop or whatever else you think every else wants too.
Didn't apple switch the default search to yahoo or Bing in about iOS 10? I'm not sure what happened after that but it seems like it was shortlived.
Why just using Google search without being signed on separate dedicated browser? It’s save you a lot time from targeted ads and browser fingerprinting.
Sadly others than Google search result is pretty lame, especially on non English things.
Sadly others than Google search result is pretty lame, especially on non English things.
Thea could use some of that money to develop new things. But they seem to be scared. Developing something new could flop and investors can’t have that.
No..Apple is privacy oriented, DDG is privacy focused. This means although Apple tend not to exploit your privacy they still collect some data, DDG on the other hand their whole business model revolves on not having an "account" on your with recorded past behaviour.
If Apple buys DDG they will monetise it, Apple works for their stockholders which want to see stock growth and higher earnings. Guess how that happens with search engine business...
TIP: If you insist on using Google, use startpage.com , it gives Google results but does not forward your info to Google. I am not sure why Google agreed to have this deal with them but this is the reality of the situation.
Thats fine, most people search for generic stuff. If all you want to do is look up research articles do it on google. The whole point was not to track your -private- life.
No... you see this is the problem, when one company owns everything its just too powerful for society's sake. Google today owns the online video, email, search, browsing, smartphone OS, some computer OS, their locations, and their online file storage. This is just too much power in the hands of 1 for-profit company. With so much power they really can alter politics of some countries.
Apple already has maps, safari, computer OS, iOS, and wearables. I like Apple but I don't want them to control all aspects of my life like the lights in my room, my car, my security camera, my email history, my tv viewings, my message history...etc etc
If Apple buys DDG they will monetise it, Apple works for their stockholders which want to see stock growth and higher earnings. Guess how that happens with search engine business...
TIP: If you insist on using Google, use startpage.com , it gives Google results but does not forward your info to Google. I am not sure why Google agreed to have this deal with them but this is the reality of the situation.
Thats fine, most people search for generic stuff. If all you want to do is look up research articles do it on google. The whole point was not to track your -private- life.
No... you see this is the problem, when one company owns everything its just too powerful for society's sake. Google today owns the online video, email, search, browsing, smartphone OS, some computer OS, their locations, and their online file storage. This is just too much power in the hands of 1 for-profit company. With so much power they really can alter politics of some countries.
Apple already has maps, safari, computer OS, iOS, and wearables. I like Apple but I don't want them to control all aspects of my life like the lights in my room, my car, my security camera, my email history, my tv viewings, my message history...etc etc
I don't think a trillion dollar company needs to take any business strategy off some random analyst. I mean they've done pretty well so far without it.
Apple has the brand recognition and clout to create their own engine from scratch. They could put together a team to crank one out and streamline in secrecy without even causing a rounding error to their balance sheet.
It isn't just new product or magic touch screen. They dont even have to throw all money into R&D, their current rate of R&D for most of their product ( Apart from Mac ) are fine.
Apple had 400 Retail Store when they have 500M iPhone users. And they were already cramped. That was before Apple Watch and AirPods. Having 1000 Stores worldwide for a 1B+ Customer Base isn't too much for an "expansion". It is more of a need. And yet Retail has had very little progress. ( Other than renovation ) They are currently sitting at just over 500 stores. Steve didn't create the Store just for Retail and Marketing. It is used for Support as well. Good Luck trying to book a support session. ( If you live in US and easily can do that, great. US has the highest, largest Apple Store area per Apple User )
They are still extremely slow with their Datacenter expansion. ( At least Apple CDN is finally a thing )
There will likely never be another product that is as big as Smartphone / iPhone. If Apple is worried about people moving off their platform, it shouldn't be some "Services" like Apple Music and Apple TV to keep them in. It should be cheap cloud Storage. It is the same strategy with Amazon AWS as Data Gravity. Once your Data lives inside the ecosystem, it is difficult, a hassle, or in AWS case really expensive to move them out. I mean they could at least start by adding 1TB tier for $5.99
These are areas, ( along with Mac, which finally got some attention ) Apple has neglected for years. And yet Apple decide to spend billions on Dramas.