I don't really expect a "PC Jr" move by Apple. Nobody will sell "crippled" again.
"we expect the cheaper phone to have a plastic casing, 4" display, and lower end internal specs (processor, camera, memory, etc.) than the 5S/5 line up"
Give me a break. If that's the case, just keep the 4s in the line up.
It makes a lot more sense to give us 5 internals in a less-snazzy case.
Maybe downgrade to a 3.5" screen (so that the "C" means both "Color" and "Compact").
But with an expected upgrade to the processor and camera in the 5s, what is the point of deliberately downgrading the 5C below the soon to be (evolutionarily) downgraded 5?
The plastic case and slightly less svelte looks will distinguish the 5C enough. And proof this analyst is blowing smoke? A $300 price tag just won't happen. If a good Nexus is $349 (with the decent memory spec), then the 5c has to start at $400. Remember, the smartphones from every other vendor (except Nokia) are in the $550-$650 range. Apple isn't losing traction to those vendors on price even with their current line up. They are losing traction based on draconian minimum guaranteed purchase requirements imposed on their carrier-partners.
Rumor has it the 5 will stay in the line. THAT makes sense, when combined with the 5C, only if the 5s has one additional feature going for it - a "growth spurt" i.e. a 4.3-5" screen. So that we have compact, medium, and sort-of-large. And in THAT scenario, Apple should STILL update the innards of the 5. So you have a 5 that is faster (A7), with a better camera; a 5s with more screenestate; and a 5C with "enough" speed (A6) and camera and a fun case. And, by this point in smartphone evolution, a more compact body for people who actually use their phones to ... ummm ... make phone calls.
Or, Apple could pull a PC Jr in which case I should sell my Apple stock notwithstanding Icahn buying about a billion in shares today.
"we expect the cheaper phone to have a plastic casing, 4" display, and lower end internal specs (processor, camera, memory, etc.) than the 5S/5 line up"
Give me a break. If that's the case, just keep the 4s in the line up.
It makes a lot more sense to give us 5 internals in a less-snazzy case.
Maybe downgrade to a 3.5" screen (so that the "C" means both "Color" and "Compact").
But with an expected upgrade to the processor and camera in the 5s, what is the point of deliberately downgrading the 5C below the soon to be (evolutionarily) downgraded 5?
The plastic case and slightly less svelte looks will distinguish the 5C enough. And proof this analyst is blowing smoke? A $300 price tag just won't happen. If a good Nexus is $349 (with the decent memory spec), then the 5c has to start at $400. Remember, the smartphones from every other vendor (except Nokia) are in the $550-$650 range. Apple isn't losing traction to those vendors on price even with their current line up. They are losing traction based on draconian minimum guaranteed purchase requirements imposed on their carrier-partners.
Rumor has it the 5 will stay in the line. THAT makes sense, when combined with the 5C, only if the 5s has one additional feature going for it - a "growth spurt" i.e. a 4.3-5" screen. So that we have compact, medium, and sort-of-large. And in THAT scenario, Apple should STILL update the innards of the 5. So you have a 5 that is faster (A7), with a better camera; a 5s with more screenestate; and a 5C with "enough" speed (A6) and camera and a fun case. And, by this point in smartphone evolution, a more compact body for people who actually use their phones to ... ummm ... make phone calls.
Or, Apple could pull a PC Jr in which case I should sell my Apple stock notwithstanding Icahn buying about a billion in shares today.