http://www.theverge.com/2014/8/6/5973487/best-tablet-you-can-buy
Surprised to see this hasn't been posted. I've got one and I agree.
Surprised to see this hasn't been posted. I've got one and I agree.
iPad Air & Mini has same score. Why iPad Air is declared as the winner?
Bigger display --> better tablet
better tablet due to better color?
Bigger display comes with less portability. I am still lost how this could be a plus point. I would say a plus point is something that can't be compensated. If the plus point is better or warmer color for iPad Air then yes![]()
If you read the article linked to in the OP, it says something to the effect that bigger is better because it gives a more immersive experience. Of course, if portability is the most important thing, then bigger isn't better, but I suppose the assumption is that for the majority of tablet users, portability isn't the most important feature. Because if it were, people will all just get the iPhone and nobody would buy any iPad, Air or Mini.
iPad Air & Mini has same score. Why iPad Air is declared as the winner?
better tablet due to better color?
Bigger display comes with less portability. I am still lost how this could be a plus point. I would say a plus point is something that can't be compensated. If the plus point is better or warmer color for iPad Air then yes![]()
Sure the mini is more portable but let's not make the air seem like a lead brick; it's extremely light and portable as well. It just won't fit in your pocket.
It is a better tablet (IMO) because it offers a more complete user experience of bringing content like movies, e-books, internet browsing, productivity to the user as a result of its larger screen real estate. I think the mini compromises on a lot of those functions for the sake of having a higher portability but overall, the air ends up checking more boxes of "tablet functions."
To you.
I think differently. The rMini excels.
To me.
I've owned both and I could not disagree with you more. The retina Mini certainly does not truncate user experience.Sure the mini is more portable but let's not make the air seem like a lead brick; it's extremely light and portable as well. It just won't fit in your pocket.
It is a better tablet (IMO) because it offers a more complete user experience of bringing content like movies, e-books, internet browsing, productivity to the user as a result of its larger screen real estate. I think the mini compromises on a lot of those functions for the sake of having a higher portability but overall, the air ends up checking more boxes of "tablet functions."
I've owned both and I could not disagree with you more. The retina Mini certainly does not truncate user experience.
It has a much smaller display with noticeably inferior color reproduction. On a tablet device which is really "all screen" how is that not a truncated user experience?
It is not to me and I assume others feel the same way. Likewise, I'm sure you can rally some folks who share your opinion...and start a club if you want. Your opinions are fine but do your very best in life to be sure you know the difference between an opinion and fact. It is not a fact that the retina mini offers a truncated user experience. It is your opinion and nothing more than that. I assume that you care about my opinion about as much as I care about yours. You don't have to bother with the mini so why in the world would you ever worry?
It has a much smaller display with noticeably inferior color reproduction. On a tablet device which is really "all screen" how is that not a truncated user experience?
And one of the primary purposes of every tablet portability.So how is a more portable tablet worse? LOL
I don't think anyone said more portable is worse. But what some people, including me, feel is that bigger is better (or conversely, smaller is worse), so in order to get a bigger tablet, we are willing to give up a litttle portability. Within reason, of course. If it gets too big, then it is no longer portable so it's no longer a tablet. On the other hand, if it gets too small, it's too small for tablet-type tasks. So there is this size range that makes sense for tablets, and within that range, some people prefer the upper end of the range, and others prefer the lower end.
If you read the article linked to in the OP, it says something to the effect that bigger is better because it gives a more immersive experience. Of course, if portability is the most important thing, then bigger isn't better, but I suppose the assumption is that for the majority of tablet users, portability isn't the most important feature. Because if it were, people will all just get the iPhone and nobody would buy any iPad, Air or Mini.