Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
One word: Zune.

Yeah. Usual MS. A great product that received barely any marketing, and withered on the vine because of it.

Don't think it didn't sell because it was a crappy product. No. It didn't sell because no one knew about it. The handful of people who actually went out and bought one thought it was an excellent device top to bottom.

It's the same way with WP7. They had that heavy marketing push at first, but now? I just went to one of the local mobile stores to see if they had any iPad slips in stock, and all I saw were Androids, Blackberries, and iPhones. There wasn't a single Windows Phone on display. How do they expect to sell their phones when stores won't even put the things out on the shelves?
 
Yeah. Usual MS. A great product that received barely any marketing, and withered on the vine because of it.

Don't think it didn't sell because it was a crappy product. No. It didn't sell because no one knew about it. The handful of people who actually went out and bought one thought it was an excellent device top to bottom.

It's the same way with WP7. They had that heavy marketing push at first, but now? I just went to one of the local mobile stores to see if they had any iPad slips in stock, and all I saw were Androids, Blackberries, and iPhones. There wasn't a single Windows Phone on display. How do they expect to sell their phones when stores won't even put the things out on the shelves?

Here in Brazil almost every store is selling Nokia Lumias. I always tend to believe that american smartphone market share is very different to the rest of the world. Also, the rest of the world has a lot to expand in the smartphone market on the contrary of USA.
 
Here in Brazil almost every store is selling Nokia Lumias. I always tend to believe that american smartphone market share is very different to the rest of the world. Also, the rest of the world has a lot to expand in the smartphone market on the contrary of USA.

It is. Elsewhere, it seems people get this wonder option of being able to pick their phones separate from the carriers. Here? If you want a certain phone, you have to go with whichever carrier is offering it. Don't like that specific carrier? Tough! You either got to swallow your pride, or choose another phone. And what if you want a phone, but none of the carriers are offering it? Double tough. Choose another phone.

The cellphone market in the US is ass backwards, and not at all consumer friendly.
 
Probably not, but Android didn't do touch screens until the iPhone came out.

Most touch screens up until 2007 were resistive. They weren't as simple or presise (when using fingers) as a capacitive screen. The iPhone was the first major player to use capacitive screens, wasn't their invention. They just saw a technology ripen and took advantage. That's what they do best.

Impressive that Apple is doing it with essentially one product, their own no less. Which means they are truly dominating the market. Android isn't really making a lot of phones these days, so their "share" is really that of various other manufacturers, running the IOS.

Bull of an argument. Android is still on top of the market, regardless of what phones they're on. And there are some phones which are selling like hotcakes. Not iPhone volume sales, but still a lot. Galaxy S2 for example?

A very very low percentage of consumers are interested in hacks or updating roms to get their phones to work better. They just want their phone to work, get updates when needed, and last but not least, apps play a very important role in the user experience. Android falls so far short on important details. A train wreck of an OS in my experience.

A very low percentage of users care about that. Agreed, just like a low percentage of users care about jailbreaking. Rooting and hacks are a niche on any platform. The "Customisation" that people go on about with android is not about tweaking settings and things, it's about being able to build your home screens the way you like it. Set it up with the widgets and apps that you like for what you want. My android phone has a great experience, not quite as seemless integration with computers as an iPhone, but I much prefer my widgets and home screens compared to the grid of apps that you get on iOS. Apparently 40odd% of people agree with that?
 
Yeah. Usual MS. A great product that received barely any marketing, and withered on the vine because of it.

Don't think it didn't sell because it was a crappy product. No. It didn't sell because no one knew about it.

I am not so sure about that. I remember Best Buy having a separate corner just for Zunes and Microsoft having some ads for it. I'd argue that it almost definitely got more marketing budget than any other non-iPod MP3 players by far.

The problem with Zune was that while it was nice, for most people there was not really any strong enough reason to buy it over iPod. Plus it was too costly and too iPod-like for those who were looking for likes of iRiver/Cowon/Archos. Sure you could say Zunepass and what nots, but at the end, it was just an attempt to bruteforce Apple's stronghold with a similar offering that failed.

In my opinion, Zune didn't sell well not because it was a crappy product or it didn't get marketing but rather its market position was weak compared to a strong incumbent and it didn't offer anything extraordinary enough to overcome that.
 
Palm. They had the best (as in most-usable, and affordable, if not the most high-spec) PDAs on the market for years. Then they sat on their laurels and watched as their competitors started offering near-equivalent devices. Not updating their devices or OS for several years pretty much killed them. My analysis? Spinning off into an OS company and a hardware company was the killing blow.

Watching Palm (which Steve at one time was reported interested in buying) shoot themselves in the foot (brain?) is probably one reason why Steve hated the idea of Mac OS licensing deals.

Palm had over 70% of the tablet market for years, as well as being the platform for the first big app store. The vast sinkhole that Palm and PalmGear left is one of the things that gave the Apple such a huge opportunity with the iPod Touch, App store, and iPad.
 
Google was racing to knock off the Blackberry ... until they saw the iPhones instant success. They changed course and knocked off the iPhone instead.

Then they whore'd out the OS for any company to use on any quality of hardware the manufacturers desired. Dozens of handset models flooded the market, low prices, freebies, 2 for 1's. The carriers are only too happy to push the Android phones because the margins are better. Hence you get the clueless kids flogging Android junk in the stores.

That's what you do when you're not laser beam focused on the user experience. Throw enough into the market, advertise the hell out of it, give resellers incentive to promote and voila a sub par product catches up on market share.
Bunch of hype, brainwashing and coercing consumers into a lessor user experience.

A very very low percentage of consumers are interested in hacks or updating roms to get their phones to work better. They just want their phone to work, get updates when needed, and last but not least, apps play a very important role in the user experience. Android falls so far short on important details. A train wreck of an OS in my experience.

You are so lost, it's not even funny.
 
Let's stop with the boring stuff that has been discussed a billion times.

I am honestly amazed that the iPhone can maintain that kind of number when it is on only 4 carriers in the US (I believe). There are a ton of smaller carriers that are surely helping Android's numbers but the fact that just 4 (and still missing one of the big 4) carriers for the iPhone in the US can produce these numbers is nothing short of amazing.
 
That doesn't even make sense, both Android and iOS came out in 2007.

Android and iOS both technically existed in 2007... but only iOS (then called iPhone OS) was on a shipping product in customers hands at that time.

Android wasn't even formally announced until November of 2007... 11 months after Apple announced the iPhone.

And the first Android phone didn't go on sale until late 2008... 15 months after the first iPhone went on sale... and 21 months after that initial iPhone announcement.
 
Don't you think the Windows phone is going to start to have a growing market share? Microsoft has deep pockets and I suspect they will support it very strongly.

I think when people see Windows 8, it's going to leave a sour taste in their mouths for Windows phones, fairly or not.
 
Sometimes less competition means less innovation. Hopefully that's not true in this case.
 
I don't think iOS has anything to worry about MS

Most iPhone owners will continue to buy the next gen iPhone.
Apple consumers are loyal.


Most people that bought Android over a iPhone.is over price and they dont like Apple products and never will.

So I see MS phones taking a part of Andriod market-share then iPhones
 
Not yet, but so far consumers have been cool to WP7 phones, and I suspect that the interface has a lot to do with it. If Nokia doesn't start grabbing more marketshare in 2012/2013 then we can talk about WP7 being counted out

Agreed, 2012/2013 is going to be a critical time for Nokia and Microsoft.

They're throwing everything they've got at it. Even risking Windows to push Metro and WP.

They have to deliver with WP8 or they are done.

I think that has something to do with it since it just looks so different. I've switched to WP7 from Android and it is a nice enough OS. But IMHO it's not really an Android alternative as some have said. It's very much Microsoft's version of iOS through and through with a very different take on the UI style and homescreen. (I don't mean that in a bad way)

If you like Android's hacking ways and file system, WP7 does very little to address those issues. The only thing WP7 and Android share are that they both get made by OEMs in various different form factors. Even then, WP7 currently doesn't support any extra hardware goodies like dualcore, better faster chips or higher resolution.

Thus with WP7, you get a very nice and different but ultimately even more limited version of iOS in hardware that are often just inferior versions of Android equivalents. Nokia is the first litmus test of WP7. Personally I'm still a bit skeptical of WP7 and not because it's a bad OS. It just has too many things stacked against it in the market.

MANY things are stacked against WP7.

Apple has an ecosystem on them, iOS is more mature and has more features on WP7, more apps, more functions, it is IMO more elegant and better looking, works and is easier to use.

Basically WP7 has nothing on iOS, it is smoother and faster than Android but other than that, nothing on it either.

To go with WP7 you simply have to absolutely hate iOS and Android.

It is. Elsewhere, it seems people get this wonder option of being able to pick their phones separate from the carriers. Here? If you want a certain phone, you have to go with whichever carrier is offering it. Don't like that specific carrier? Tough! You either got to swallow your pride, or choose another phone. And what if you want a phone, but none of the carriers are offering it? Double tough. Choose another phone.

The cellphone market in the US is ass backwards, and not at all consumer friendly.

Yea, you guys have it very bad, carriers don't even unlock phones once the contract is over. That is ridiculous!
 
Is there an actual number on how many iPhone 4S' were sold since it's release?

I just want to compare it to the Galaxy S2, which sold over 20 million units since it's release in May. The 20 million figure was released in February, so it doesn't account for March, and it doesn't state if the sales figure is just North America or Worldwide.
 
Mechanical keyboard. It is the one thing that iOS will never have and for some people it is a must. I think there is room for tremendous growth in the U.S. smartphone market as most people don't have one and, basically, everyone could use one if they would just learn how to use it. Even grandma wants a smartphone, she just doesn't know it yet. Then assuming nearly everyone replaces their smartphone with a new one within three years, you have a really large and wide-open market. Now the investment in Apps may link you to an ecosystem permanently. But really, how much would it cost to replace your best Apps? Lots that you use are free and many cost a dollar. The games that you have played out don't have to make it to your next smartphone. The video that you have bought on iTunes has already been watched. The music can be transferred over or carried in a shuffle.

If Microsoft allows itself to be put on some interesting form factors, including ones with mechanical keyboards, they might have a shot at grabbing some of the smartphone holdouts. This would especially be the case if folks have learned how to use the system on Windows 8 and it gets presented as a seamless transition. The problem is that Windows 8 adoption is probably going to be too slow and late because the smartphone wars are happening now.

I still think Microsoft will carve out 10% of the market in a few years. Remember, this is basically an operating system that we are talking about here. They don't always get this right, but they sometimes do, so don't count them. The Zune was mainly a hardware move (the OS was simple on it) and not their sweet spot.
 
That 5% number for RIM is mind blowing. Has any company squandered/mis-managed a brand (in N America) worse than they have in the past 5 years? I cant think of one. Very sad as I WAS a 6 year BB owner :(

Sad in a way, but really DESERVED. Before the iPhone, the mobile phone industry sat around NOT innovating because they didn't have to. They kept providing crap phones with non-intuitive interfaces because it was "good enough". We suffered for years at their hands until Apple woke them up. They had all the opportunity in the world to research and develop high quality products and interfaces while enjoying huge marketshare. They chose not to.

----------

You are so lost, it's not even funny.

He's actually right on. :p

----------

No. Android did NOT copy iOS.

Everything you write is B.S.

I've no explanation but that's not true. Enough said.

/typicalDenial

It's pretty well established that Android was completely revamped as a direct result of the iPhone. So, yeah, they did copy iPhone OS.
 
It's pretty well established that Android was completely revamped as a direct result of the iPhone. So, yeah, they did copy iPhone OS.
Oh really?
Care to back that up with actual poof?
And don't whip out the tired pics of a BB style prototype since Android has been hardware agnostic since day 1.
We're talking OS, not hardware.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.