One word: Zune.
Yeah. Usual MS. A great product that received barely any marketing, and withered on the vine because of it.
Don't think it didn't sell because it was a crappy product. No. It didn't sell because no one knew about it. The handful of people who actually went out and bought one thought it was an excellent device top to bottom.
It's the same way with WP7. They had that heavy marketing push at first, but now? I just went to one of the local mobile stores to see if they had any iPad slips in stock, and all I saw were Androids, Blackberries, and iPhones. There wasn't a single Windows Phone on display. How do they expect to sell their phones when stores won't even put the things out on the shelves?
Here in Brazil almost every store is selling Nokia Lumias. I always tend to believe that american smartphone market share is very different to the rest of the world. Also, the rest of the world has a lot to expand in the smartphone market on the contrary of USA.
Probably not, but Android didn't do touch screens until the iPhone came out.
Impressive that Apple is doing it with essentially one product, their own no less. Which means they are truly dominating the market. Android isn't really making a lot of phones these days, so their "share" is really that of various other manufacturers, running the IOS.
A very very low percentage of consumers are interested in hacks or updating roms to get their phones to work better. They just want their phone to work, get updates when needed, and last but not least, apps play a very important role in the user experience. Android falls so far short on important details. A train wreck of an OS in my experience.
Yeah. Usual MS. A great product that received barely any marketing, and withered on the vine because of it.
Don't think it didn't sell because it was a crappy product. No. It didn't sell because no one knew about it.
Palm. They had the best (as in most-usable, and affordable, if not the most high-spec) PDAs on the market for years. Then they sat on their laurels and watched as their competitors started offering near-equivalent devices. Not updating their devices or OS for several years pretty much killed them. My analysis? Spinning off into an OS company and a hardware company was the killing blow.
Probably not, but Android didn't do touch screens until the iPhone came out.
The cellphone market in the US is ass backwards, and not at all consumer friendly.
Google was racing to knock off the Blackberry ... until they saw the iPhones instant success. They changed course and knocked off the iPhone instead.
Then they whore'd out the OS for any company to use on any quality of hardware the manufacturers desired. Dozens of handset models flooded the market, low prices, freebies, 2 for 1's. The carriers are only too happy to push the Android phones because the margins are better. Hence you get the clueless kids flogging Android junk in the stores.
That's what you do when you're not laser beam focused on the user experience. Throw enough into the market, advertise the hell out of it, give resellers incentive to promote and voila a sub par product catches up on market share.
Bunch of hype, brainwashing and coercing consumers into a lessor user experience.
A very very low percentage of consumers are interested in hacks or updating roms to get their phones to work better. They just want their phone to work, get updates when needed, and last but not least, apps play a very important role in the user experience. Android falls so far short on important details. A train wreck of an OS in my experience.
That doesn't even make sense, both Android and iOS came out in 2007.
Don't you think the Windows phone is going to start to have a growing market share? Microsoft has deep pockets and I suspect they will support it very strongly.
Probably not, but Android didn't do touch screens until the iPhone came out.
That doesn't even make sense, both Android and iOS came out in 2007.
Not yet, but so far consumers have been cool to WP7 phones, and I suspect that the interface has a lot to do with it. If Nokia doesn't start grabbing more marketshare in 2012/2013 then we can talk about WP7 being counted out
I think that has something to do with it since it just looks so different. I've switched to WP7 from Android and it is a nice enough OS. But IMHO it's not really an Android alternative as some have said. It's very much Microsoft's version of iOS through and through with a very different take on the UI style and homescreen. (I don't mean that in a bad way)
If you like Android's hacking ways and file system, WP7 does very little to address those issues. The only thing WP7 and Android share are that they both get made by OEMs in various different form factors. Even then, WP7 currently doesn't support any extra hardware goodies like dualcore, better faster chips or higher resolution.
Thus with WP7, you get a very nice and different but ultimately even more limited version of iOS in hardware that are often just inferior versions of Android equivalents. Nokia is the first litmus test of WP7. Personally I'm still a bit skeptical of WP7 and not because it's a bad OS. It just has too many things stacked against it in the market.
It is. Elsewhere, it seems people get this wonder option of being able to pick their phones separate from the carriers. Here? If you want a certain phone, you have to go with whichever carrier is offering it. Don't like that specific carrier? Tough! You either got to swallow your pride, or choose another phone. And what if you want a phone, but none of the carriers are offering it? Double tough. Choose another phone.
The cellphone market in the US is ass backwards, and not at all consumer friendly.
Expect to see WP7 to make a dent in those stats this year. Especially with the Lumia 900 coming out soon.
That 5% number for RIM is mind blowing. Has any company squandered/mis-managed a brand (in N America) worse than they have in the past 5 years? I cant think of one. Very sad as I WAS a 6 year BB owner![]()
You are so lost, it's not even funny.
No. Android did NOT copy iOS.
Everything you write is B.S.
I've no explanation but that's not true. Enough said.
/typicalDenial
Oh really?It's pretty well established that Android was completely revamped as a direct result of the iPhone. So, yeah, they did copy iPhone OS.