Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Android Dominates Nearly 80% of Smartphone Market, iOS Drops to 13% Share
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
With the robustness of security and enterprise features in BB10, I personally feel you're going to see Blackberry retake a significant portion of the corporate business market. It's consumer presence will be lackluster until it can release a version of the OS with greater polish than it currently has.
Not to hijack the topic here, but it's arguable that Pet Sounds is better than any single Beatles album. I tend to disagree, as Revolver is the best Beatles album, but I digress.
Apple isn't interested in domination so much as it is interested in making money.
Huh. I figured developers tend to target the platform where they make more money.
Market share is only important in context. Apple currently enjoys all the benefits of being in first place even though it is in second place. When that changes, I will be concerned as a consumer.
Apple doesn't play at the very low end.
Taking all devices is not accurate.
All devices include prepaid where iOS is for the most part missing.
There will always be more Android devices shipped.
Android is on all types of phones; flip, small screen, large screen, tablet phones...
The comparison should only be candy bar phones in 3.5-5" screen sizes, etc.
People buying a flip phone running Android, just aren't in the market for an iPhone.
They should be looking at phones that directly compete.
Analysts are morons. "Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics."
Taking all devices is not accurate.
All devices include prepaid where iOS is for the most part missing.
There will always be more Android devices shipped.
Android is on all types of phones; flip, small screen, large screen, tablet phones...
The comparison should only be candy bar phones in 3.5-5" screen sizes, etc.
People buying a flip phone running Android, just aren't in the market for an iPhone.
They should be looking at phones that directly compete.
Analysts are morons. "Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics."
I didn't switch yet because of 1Password not being available for Android. But soon I will just switch to LastPass and that's it! That Moto X sure looks sweet! As soon as will be available in Europe I'll buy one! I wanted a bigger screen, I wanted NFC, and Apple didn't want to give me any of these! They just said that they know better than me what I need! Well, I have to disagree with them. I know better what I need! I'm sorry my iPhone 4, you were great, but now it's time for me to move on!
Mad Mac Maniac
macrumors 601
A quick look above and below your post will show the developer profit on iOS is about 3 fold as on Android. That combined with the simplicity to develop for, is going to keep iOS as primary developed for OS for quite some time.
Marketshare has NOTHING to do with being able to make the best phone. The best ways to do that? High profit is number one. And honestly a LOWER production run. Cutting edge technology is really difficult to get 100M into production. It'd be much easier to only get say 20M into production.
Yes, that's what they could do if they cared about marketshare. But they don't. ANY companies number 1 goal is profit, profit, and profit. Yeah, we as consumers want cheap stuff. But so what.
You still haven't convinced me that marketshare is more important than profit. YOU may want more people to have iPhones to make yourself feel better about your purchase.
That being said, I understand marketshare is needed to an extent. If Apple goes down to 5% marketshare that could start to have a negative impact. And I think that's why the iPhone 5C will mitigate that possibility. But I don't think Apple needs to release a $200 phone. That would hurt them far more than help them.
The problem Apple have is they are greedy. They charge massively over the odds for things. Take the imac for example. They charge twice the price for a ssd hard drive. They charge more like 3-4 times the price for memory upgrades. They are sitting on billions of pounds. Something tells me the profit margins are waaaaaay too high and this is why people are abandoning ship. Im leaving apple today actually , yes everything works nicely together but its not perfect and with the mac pro or high end imac the only option for me , i can build a PC for less than half with a better spec.
Greed!!!
Greed!!!
Why does Apple need it's computers to be on everyone's desk when they basically reinvented the computer space and now hardly anyone uses a computer on a desk and uses MacBookAirs, iPads and IPhones. They've sold hundreds of millions of each while increasing their desktop share to boot.
Your logic is really bad.
That's not what is happening. This chart shows first time buyers (presumably most of which are coming from China/India) are choosing Android.
You are talking about retention and the stats show that iPhone still has higher retention than Android. In other words, on their next purchase iPhone users tend to buy another iPhone more than Android users tend to buy another Android.
No it doesnt. Unlike Apple, the majority of those other competitors handsets are returned to sender after they fail to sell.
Profit is the only true reliable metric. The HP Touchpad proved that the shipped metric was so badly faulted. HP shipped 1 million touchpads. 25K were sold. 975k+ were slated for return before the fire sale.
I mean why do you think NONE and I mean NONE of these handset vendors and tablet vendors are reporting SALES. Don't give me the whole.."oh they sell to 3rd party vendors like Verizon, ATT, Best Buy, etc and can't track them" bs....Apple does the same thing.
It's because their sales are HORRIBLE. If they were decent or even great, they'd be shouting it from high heaven.
It's just like Amazon refusing to break out their sales for Kindles.
Those that hide their #s are hiding them for a reason.
It would be nice if IDC split the report into market segments. If there were a high-end, mid-range and low-end chart all of this "Apple is doomed, I am going to start developing for Android" nonsense will end.
It is rather clear that Apple is holding its own in the high-end, gaining in the mid-range, and non-existant in the fast growing low-end. Why people consider that four $50 phones sold to people in China are somehow more meaningful than selling one $650 iPhone 5 is beyond me.
It is rather clear that Apple is holding its own in the high-end, gaining in the mid-range, and non-existant in the fast growing low-end. Why people consider that four $50 phones sold to people in China are somehow more meaningful than selling one $650 iPhone 5 is beyond me.
Who really gives a **** about 'world wide' marketshare?
This includes **** hole 2nd and 3rd world countries which would add next to nothing to Apple's bottom line.
The only metric that makes any difference is profitshare and Apple is still king - by a wide margin.
Sure there are untapped markets (China) where Apple would like to gain a foothold and they are addressing that issue with this new iPhone 5C (or whatever). Statistics like that cited in the article include people in **** hold countries (or continents) like Africa and South America who's markets have a very small value proposition.
Then again, Apple could just chase marketshare with low margin products and put their entire business model in jeopardy.
This includes **** hole 2nd and 3rd world countries which would add next to nothing to Apple's bottom line.
The only metric that makes any difference is profitshare and Apple is still king - by a wide margin.
Sure there are untapped markets (China) where Apple would like to gain a foothold and they are addressing that issue with this new iPhone 5C (or whatever). Statistics like that cited in the article include people in **** hold countries (or continents) like Africa and South America who's markets have a very small value proposition.
Then again, Apple could just chase marketshare with low margin products and put their entire business model in jeopardy.
Interesting. This doesn't apply to iPod/iTunes (still leading) iBooks (entered mature market way after)...
Way crazier numbers than I thought. Profits are great, but low user numbers will severely hurt Apple. Most of the huge apps (Facebook, Instagram, banking apps, foursquare, etc) are all free. They will all go Android first. Also monetizing is catching up on the Android side. I just can't see a way for Apple to turn this around.
Go for it. You won't be missed no does anyone believe you. And have fun with that PC.
This is such an amazing statement
Sorry I did not think these forums were populated with being that existed on other plants, as I can assure you computers on desks still rule and run the world.
Yeah yeah (no Beatle joke ;-) ) we know that story about competition by now. Every thread someone has to mention it as if it's news.
That's because you are blind as a bat from your logic and coming to that conclusion from a 'shipped' metric.
autrefois
macrumors 65816
Huh. How do you explain why more and more developers are heading towards Android even though they currently make more money on iOS? Because Android has a huge and growing marketshare. As their marketshare is growing, the amount of money developers can make is also growing.
Apple's marketshare is dropping. What part of this looks promising for me as a consumer who uses iOS? A platform with hardware that is more expensive and a dwindling marketshare. It is not difficult to see a point where it will become common for there to be an Android version of an app and not an iOS one (where today there opposite is often the case). I want healthy competition, not just huge profits. I don't want Apple with iOS & iPhone to go back to the days like when you felt lucky if something on the PC was also available for the Mac even if the Mac was the superior experience.
Last edited: