Android Promoters Won't Get Caught Tweeting From iPhone Anymore With Upcoming Twitter Changes

He was also just pissing on his engineers and then fired a guy for pointing out he was wrong.

Free Speech my A$$ I guess.
It seems a lot of people don't under stand what Free Speech means, It only has to do with what you can say about the government and what the government can do to you if you do say something about the government(Nothing). But it doesn't protect you from any other speech, say something bad about your boss, they can fire you (in most states).
 
My boss isn’t a holy spirit. If he’s wrong he’s wrong and I tell it to his face and he’s happy to be corrected. Thats how a good work relationship should work. I wouldn’t even let my mother talk down on me as a grown ass person
Crying on Twitter to the void about your boss does not equal talking to someone face-to-face.
 
Twitter does have way too many microservices running, and that does affect app performance more so than the web version, for a variety of reasons. While they only cited Android performance, iOS is a slog too. Like I never understood why it was important to be writing the source publicly in the API.

As for the dev, well the guy was already one-foot out the door because his twitter profile said something like "looking for oppertunties, still @twitter" at the time. There is also having a conversation versus just flat out telling someone they are wrong. But then again this is why devs work in the back room, they aren't always good at handling the public statement side of things. Yes it's important to identify you work for twitter when making a statement, there is a code of conduct that is agreed to as terms of employment. Twitter public has a lot of volunteer HR people that is for sure.
 
Charging money for features that are currently free and taking away features that have always been there… great way to keep your user base and grow your business!
You mean the Holy Blue Check that nobody could get unless Abu-Musab al Dorsey "granted" them such? Like all the "elite" that has their panties in a twist over it? Hold on, let me get my small violin so I can play on it while you elaborate further.
 
Honestly as someone who uses Twitter pretty casually watching Elon make it implode is HILARIOUS. I do feel bad for people that lost their job suddenly but they’ll probably get a nice severance since Musk is an idiot and didn’t provide notice.

This small change is good I think but there’s just so many more important things he should be doing right now to make it better. He created a massive problem, the massive changes to verification, that created problems a 10 year old could have figured out.

Feels like he got captured by a section of the internet that are just constantly mad about things but don’t have any actual solutions, which to be fair I think is ok to be mad without having a solution but you can’t run a company that way lol.
 
It seems a lot of people don't under stand what Free Speech means, It only has to do with what you can say about the government and what the government can do to you if you do say something about the government(Nothing).

Not quite correct. The topic needn’t be about government.
 
If you think free speech means being able to say whatever you want publicly about the company/CEO you work for, while remaining employed at that company and paid by that person, I almost don't know what to say.

The guy wasn't banned from Twitter or stopped from speaking. He was fired from Twitter. He has no right to work at Twitter if Twitter doesn't want him there.
Correct. Hence, no free speech.

Dude, its OK to admit that you hate free speech, when you hate free speech.
 
Another example of Elon having his head up his arse: he says here that this feature is a “waste of screen space” when it occupies a line that already has other features next to it, yet added another whole line to tweets by “official” accounts.

That was the whole point of the blue checkmark in the first place - to prove which accounts were official. But noooo, we gotta stick it to the elites! :rolleyes: As if Elon isn’t literally the world’s richest man. So ****ing stupid.
 
So the person that impersonated Eli Lilly caused the company to lose 4% of its marketing cap. Consequentially that company terminated its advertising campaign on Twitter which causes Twitter to lose a certain amount of revenue. I always thought that the credit card number used to purchase something can be traced back to its owner. Based on this, can Eli Lilly and Twitter sue the person who did the impersonation?

I asked be cause I'm clueless. I genuinely, for my education purpose, wanna ask if someone with background in legal matters can tell me if this is valid ground for the two companies to bring legal charges against the person? Let's not kid ourselves here, Twitter's lost revenue can't be less than a few million and the 4% market cap damage done to Eli Lilly is above $10 Billion. That company is currently worth beyond $330B. Thanks and I look forward to replies on this question.
 
I don't publicly disrespect my boss, do you? Sure I can say whatever I want but I also am an intelligent human being and I know that would be frowned upon.
Plus he is not the government. You are not protected from citizens and businesses consequences as long as they aren't illegal
 
How did he disrespect him though? Musk made a statement, the guy engaged with him in a conversation (that should have STARTED offline in the first place) and when Musk ended up being in the wrong, he got offended like a little boy.

You all sound like you work in toxic work environments btw. NO THANKS
I don't think it was disrespect. The engineer has the right to speak to Musk on public platform. But he's not allowed to speak on behalf of the company, especially when revealing internal information, without permissions from authorities within. This is the policy in pretty much every company. He would have been okay if he said "in my opinion, we did good" while going straight against Musk and not get the wrath. But when he particularly pointed out technical details in his post, he begged to get fired. Let's not forget the attitude attached to that post, while not disrespectful, clearly showed his disregard for ranks.

Twitter is no longer a public company. Musk is now the SOLE boss of the entire organization. He doesn't have to answer to the SEC nor the board. He gets to make these decisions because he paid $44B for it. I'm not saying that everyone at Twitter gotta suck it up and take it. But nobody forces them either. If they don't like it there they can leave. But if they decide to stay, they can't expect the company to regulate itself as a public company period.
 
Make's no difference if he does or doesn't.

Act unprofessional like a petulant child insulting your boss or higher ups, expect to be fired.
There used to be people here who did nearly no work and nothing ever happened until they mouthed off to leadership then BUH BYE!!!!
 
It seems a lot of people don't under stand what Free Speech means, It only has to do with what you can say about the government and what the government can do to you if you do say something about the government(Nothing). But it doesn't protect you from any other speech, say something bad about your boss, they can fire you (in most states).
Everybody knows this. It's Elon that has (strongly) perpetuated the idea that any suppression of speech beyond the confines of the law is censorship. Therefore it comes of as, at best, hypocritical when he is firing employees for voicing their opinion and removing tweets.
 
His dream of twitter is a town hall where you can come say whatever you want.

This guy works with him, clearly isn't professional, so he fired him. He is free to work anywhere in the world, just not at a place he owns.

He didn't censor him, he didn't delete him, he just chose that this guy isn't a team player at his company.

Wtf does that have to do anything about free speech? If you say **** I don't like, and I PAY YOU, then I'm firing your ass, you can go say the same stuff at someone else's place.
And it's not necessarily what. It's WHERE and HOW it was said.
 
Pointing out when a person is wrong is not disrespecting. Just because is the boss, it doesn't mean the boss can't be wrong. Being afraid to speak out does not indicate a healthy work relationship.
It's WHERE and HOW not what was said. If you asked your boss for a private meeting nicely or send an email just to them, and calmly plead your case, you aren't getting fired unless they're totally unreasonable
 
I saw this a few days ago and think it's great. Someone could post a great tweet, but someone would see Android and shut them down. But I am also curious what detective work people will do to determine which device tweeted
 
It's WHERE and HOW not what was said. If you asked your boss for a private meeting nicely or send an email just to them, and calmly plead your case, you aren't getting fired unless they're totally unreasonable
So what you are saying is that boss needs to be told privately that he/she is wrong, and not in a meetings when issues are discussed? I don't think so. I say what I think, where and when it needs to be said. If boss doesn't like it, tough sh.t, I move to the next job.
 
Correct. Hence, no free speech.

Dude, its OK to admit that you hate free speech, when you hate free speech.

I really don't understand how you came to that conclusion. The guy is still on Twitter and can say whatever he wants.

But he never had any particular right to work at Twitter, and firing people for saying certain things or behaving in certain ways is completely standard fare at pretty much any company on earth.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top