In a perfect world that would make sense, but that just isn't how it is. Some people might want a smart watch that does things the Apple watch doesn't do. Or they simply like the design of one of the other smart watches better. I don't think one should expect perfect integration in those situations, but to expect someone to be 100% Android or 100% Apple because they like a watch or specific phone or tablet is ridiculous. Just because I have a Samsung TV doesn't mean I should have to have a Samsung sound bar and Samsung blu-ray player.
[doublepost=1475997188][/doublepost]
But my regular watch can't show me the text message that is displayed on my phone that is 4 feet away from me.
I tried the whole smart watch thing and think it is mostly an unnecessary accessory. It is great for working out, no doubt about it. It is also nice for looking at a message or something while driving if you don't want or have your phone hooked up to your car via bluetooth. Other than that, the fact that your phone needs to be within a reasonable distance to still use all the features pretty much eliminates the need for a smart watch. Now maybe in the future they will expand usability without needing the phone around you and that could greatly change the game, but until then it is mostly pointless, in my opinion.
To be honest, you kind of lost me when you said "popular".
Perhaps they should all just invest in a proper smartwatch.
PS: This isn't really an Apple problem, is it? Google added iOS support, it's up to Google to maintain that support, and if it hasn't done so it is solely to make its competitor look bad. Android users should see it as a great example of how software and security updates work on their imitative and fragmented platform.
That's awful for those two people.
You shouldn't be allowed to talk about technical issues. Apple's Bluetooth implementation is hardly complying with standards or best practice recommendations. And Apple is notorious to make serious changes with how their OS handles or interprets hardware, even on a low level basis without prior notice or ANY mention in their changelog.
So devs basically have NO chance to act proactively (as if... I know...) as long as Apple treats their future product releases as if it was a matter of national security.
You get a fraction of the features using android wear with iOS, I don't know why one wouldn't get Apple Watch if they really wanted a smart watch if they were an iPhone user. If looks of the Watch mattered that much then buy a regular watch
Yeah, I agree, smart watches aren't for everyone. I have a friend who would never use a smart watch for reasons you mentioned. I on the other hand like it for convenience. I can see notifications without taking them out of my pocket haha. Really depends on usage. I also like the fact that I can change the watch face to suit my clothes. But smart watches aren't for everyone and many people have no need or want for them haha
Uh, what? Turning a speaker into a wireless hotspot (aka "MiFi") is, well, that's bordering on the RefrigiToaster category of product mashups.
Just wait until these watches start catching on fire!
Just to jump in, using chromecast video and audio, they are a better product , for instance chrome cast audio is excellent in turning any speaker into a wireless hotspot, and they work great with my iPhone / Apple gears
Uh, what? Turning a speaker into a wireless hotspot (aka "MiFi") is, well, that's bordering on the RefrigiToaster category of product mashups.
Who said anything about ditching a speaker? Read what you wrote. Read what I replied. Search the page you linked for the word "hotspot" (hint, it's not there). Read the definition of "wireless hotspot" from Wikipedia:Have a read. An excellent product.
http://www.google.com/intl/en_uk/chromecast/audio/explore/
I have a B&W zeppelin , non air version, why on earth should I ditch such an excellent speaker and upgrade it to the AIR one? When I can just plug on the chrome cast?
Who said anything about ditching a speaker? Read what you wrote. Read what I replied. Search the page you linked for the word "hotspot" (hint, it's not there). Read the definition of "wireless hotspot" from Wikipedia:
A hotspot is a physical location where people may obtain Internet access, typically using Wi-Fi technology, via a wireless local area network (WLAN) using a router connected to an internet service provider.
The Chromecast Audio according to the page you linked, is "a small media streaming device that plugs into the AUX input of your speaker, making your speaker Wi-Fi enabled". That's not a "wireless hotspot" - it's not providing Internet access, it doesn't connect to an ISP. It doesn't connect other computers to the Internet, it connects a speaker to local WiFi.
P.S. B&W makes some very nice speakers. We can agree on that bit.![]()
But why would you buy an iPhone 7 and then buy an Android Wear watch?
Problems like this are inevitable.
Apple's marketing scheme to convert Android wearers to the Apple Watch.
The decision is mostly because of the design, where Apple Watch look like a smaller iPhone, most Android Wear watches look like regular watch.
In a perfect world that would make sense, but that just isn't how it is. Some people might want a smart watch that does things the Apple watch doesn't do. Or they simply like the design of one of the other smart watches better. I don't think one should expect perfect integration in those situations, but to expect someone to be 100% Android or 100% Apple because they like a watch or specific phone or tablet is ridiculous. Just because I have a Samsung TV doesn't mean I should have to have a Samsung sound bar and Samsung blu-ray player.
I guess I must be OCD. I have all my computing devices made by Apple. iMac, Mac air, 2 iPad air2, 4 iPhones, 2 ATVs, and a time capsule. For my view pleasure, I have 2 Samsung TVs and 2 Samsung soundbars. So yeah.
This already exists and is another reason why the Android Wear compatibility is awesome. The Apple Watch's lack of LTE is a huge shortcoming again. Many new Android Wear watches have LTE now and work over cellular to provide all notifications from your phone whether you have the phone or not...for example the LG Watch Urbane LTE...awesome and works with iPhone.In a perfect world that would make sense, but that just isn't how it is. Some people might want a smart watch that does things the Apple watch doesn't do. Or they simply like the design of one of the other smart watches better. I don't think one should expect perfect integration in those situations, but to expect someone to be 100% Android or 100% Apple because they like a watch or specific phone or tablet is ridiculous. Just because I have a Samsung TV doesn't mean I should have to have a Samsung sound bar and Samsung blu-ray player.
[doublepost=1475997188][/doublepost]
But my regular watch can't show me the text message that is displayed on my phone that is 4 feet away from me.
I tried the whole smart watch thing and think it is mostly an unnecessary accessory. It is great for working out, no doubt about it. It is also nice for looking at a message or something while driving if you don't want or have your phone hooked up to your car via bluetooth. Other than that, the fact that your phone needs to be within a reasonable distance to still use all the features pretty much eliminates the need for a smart watch. Now maybe in the future they will expand usability without needing the phone around you and that could greatly change the game, but until then it is mostly pointless, in my opinion.
There are already a handful of Android Wear watches with standalone LTE and apple fell short again leaving this out. The newest LG watch urbane thing has LTE and despite it having its own phone number, it uses that cellular connectivity to deliver notifications from the paired phone no matter where it is.There is no fault in your reasoning for using a smart watch. We all have our own reasons for using the products we do. I just feel that smart watches won't ever truly be used on a large scale until they can do more without relying on the cell phone. For example if I needed to go out of the office or house for 12 hours and wasn't able to take my phone for whatever reason, if I could still receive my messages and reply and use the other features without connectivity issues then it would be perfect. Essentially they need to be a limited use cell phone that fits on a wrist before it is truly practical. Although then I guess people would argue the need for an actual cell phone haha.
Why would Apple marketing go to such a hassle to convince these 2 people to buy Apple Watch?
[doublepost=1476078249][/doublepost]
A real watch? Don't make me laugh. They scream GADGET!! And what do you mean by real watch anyway? Mechanical watches? They do come on square shape aswell.
I don't think that's the reason people buy them. I think it is more because they are less pricey then the Apple watch and most importantly the Android market share is bigger in Europe.
This already exists and is another reason why the Android Wear compatibility is awesome. The Apple Watch's lack of LTE is a huge shortcoming again. Many new Android Wear watches have LTE now and work over cellular to provide all notifications from your phone whether you have the phone or not...for example the LG Watch Urbane LTE...awesome and works with iPhone.
[doublepost=1476104739][/doublepost]
There are already a handful of Android Wear watches with standalone LTE and apple fell short again leaving this out. The newest LG watch urbane thing has LTE and despite it having its own phone number, it uses that cellular connectivity to deliver notifications from the paired phone no matter where it is.
But why would you buy an iPhone 7 and then buy an Android Wear watch?
Problems like this are inevitable.
A real watch? Don't make me laugh. They scream GADGET!! And what do you mean by real watch anyway? Mechanical watches? They do come on square shape aswell.
I don't think that's the reason people buy them. I think it is more because they are less pricey then the Apple watch and most importantly the Android market share is bigger in Europe.
That's awful for those two people.