I thought the Ducks had a moderate amount of fans or perhaps it really is HAD.
Can't be as bad as the Kings had been for some years! haha
We do, but they seem to be fair weathered...!
I thought the Ducks had a moderate amount of fans or perhaps it really is HAD.
Can't be as bad as the Kings had been for some years! haha
We do, but they seem to be fair weathered...!
i could imagine! i wish hawks tickets were as cheap as yours.
They used to be. When I went to college in Chicago, I think in 2007-08 I got $5 tickets on the regular to Hawks home games. Now preseason tickets are triple digits. Gotta love it.
They used to be. When I went to college in Chicago, I think in 2007-08 I got $5 tickets on the regular to Hawks home games. Now preseason tickets are triple digits. Gotta love it.
There's another word for "Fairweather fan". It's "fan"
There's another word for "Fairweather fan". It's "fan"
Ok then...............
This doesn't make sense... "fan" is short for "fanatic". How can you call yourself a fanatic yet only watch the team when they're good?
It makes sense when you research the difference between the two words. A "fan" is derived from the word "fanatic" but has a completely different meaning. A "fan" is a supporter or an afficionado. A "fanatic" is defined by an excessive amount of zeal. Most fans are "supporters".
Nearly every fanbase is "fairweather". The Yankees saw attendance hits based on ticket prices when they weren't playing well. I suggest we drop the term fairweather, especially when you base the claim "fair weather" on attendance.
But please, do yourself a favor and look these things up before you call me out on an archaic definition of a word. I am a Bulls, Bears, White Sox, Fighting Illini, and Blackhawks fan. I have been able to attend zero of their games in the last calendar year. I refuse to watch a subpar product. I am a fan, not a "fairweather" fan.
A fan is a synonym for supporter, so they're essentially the same.Not to split hairs, but then what would you classify the term "A True Fan or Die Hard Fan" as... A true/die hard supporter or would you consider them a Fan?
So by your own definition, if the product is subpar and you do not go to the games to support that team, wouldn't that make you just a supporter? A fairweather fan will only go when the team is doing good. Yet you say you refuse to watch a subpar product but call your self a fan not a supporter?
Attendance is really the number one metric to describe the frailty of a fanbase. I see empty seats in a stadium, but I don't see TV numbers and the like.And please tell me anywhere where I mentioned fan based on attendance?
Same here! Go Bolts and Go Hawks!Blackhawks and Lighting fan here.
Blackhawks goaltending looks to be suspect. I doubt they're a SC favorite as a result.
Crawford has to be better.
He was actually pretty good last night. But in Edmonton, that was just embarrassing. That was Raanta though. Last time Crawford played, which was Thursday in Minnesota, he made like 40+ saves. So he's still pretty good. However, I'll admit he hasn't seemed as strong after the injury.