LethalWolfe said:If you make Mac products for a living and you cannot afford to spend $999 to rent a machine for the next year+ to make sure your products run on next gen Macs you should probably take that as a sign that you should do something else for a living.
I can't imagine any commercial companies balking at $999.
Share/freeware guys who code in their basement on the weekends sure, but not people who make their living from the Mac platform.
Lethal
I don't disagree with your assessment.
It's just that in my mind Steve's chances of greatly increasing the amount of apps available for his platform, and hence his market share would go up exponentially inversely proportionally to the price of the machine going down.
So a free machine would get some time wasters and weekend tinkers on board, but as already mentioned Apple can easily afford it and the benefits would far outweigh the minor negatives.