Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rhildinger

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 11, 2006
70
14
Anyone else besides me find the 42mm watch too small and wish it came in an even larger size? I'm not knocking the current size offerings - if they work well for you that's great! Personally, I'd like to see an even larger size, along with the larger battery that would enable...
 

Tmelon

macrumors 65816
Feb 26, 2011
1,149
619
It would definitely have some advantages in readability and battery life, but unless you have really big wrists, it would definitely look a bit weird.
 

mchoffa

macrumors 6502a
Jul 12, 2008
832
52
Asheville, NC
I think the 42mm looks small on my wrist (and I'm not a big guy). My wife ordered a 38mm, but she's thinking my size might be good for her (too bad they don't have modern buckles for 42mm). Something like 46 would be perfect for me I think.
 

jtrue28

macrumors 65816
Apr 10, 2015
1,028
711
Lexington, KY
rufus-cuff-10.jpg


laugh.gif
sick.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoveToMacRumors

KojiH

macrumors 6502
Sep 19, 2012
312
28
Yes. I'm a watch collector and most of my watches range between 44-48mm with a good number at 50mm as well. So 45mm would have been perfect. One of my favorite watches, the Omega Planet Ocean is 45.5mm in diameter and I find it to be the ideal size.

I think it would have been nice if Apple had chosen to separate the two sizes a little further apart. 38mm and 42mm are not that different.

----------

LOL

dscf7669.jpg
 

venom600

macrumors 65816
Mar 23, 2003
1,296
1,099
Los Angeles, CA
I wish they had a 46 or 50mm option. The 42 is smaller than any watch I've ever owned. In fact, when I first tried it on at the Apple Store, I was almost certain that they had fitted me with a 38mm watch.
 

perezr10

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2014
1,990
1,457
Monroe, Louisiana
No way! I wore a 52mm Pebble for over a year and my 38mm Apple Watch now seems so nice. And the problem with a wider watch is that it starts to impede your wrist from bending back if it sits to far up your arm.

I've done the big smart watch thing and I'm so not going back there. And the funny thing is, the actual screen on my 38mm watch is larger than the screen on the 52mm Pebble.
 

caligurl

macrumors 68040
Jun 8, 2009
3,647
1,532
socal
nope..... i really wanted the 42mm before trying it on.... i wanted the larger screen.... but my wrists are so small, that i had to get a 38mm....

so larger does me no good...
 

FuzzyLogic13

macrumors newbie
Apr 28, 2015
19
0
nope..... i really wanted the 42mm before trying it on.... i wanted the larger screen.... but my wrists are so small, that i had to get a 38mm....

so larger does me no good...

Maybe if they would do a rectangle shape and not just square, we could have more real estate on the top and bottom at least.
 

caligurl

macrumors 68040
Jun 8, 2009
3,647
1,532
socal
Maybe if they would do a rectangle shape and not just square, we could have more real estate on the top and bottom at least.

uhm..... :confused: the current apple watch IS a rectangle.... a square is all 4 equal. sides... a rectangle is 2 shorter and 2 longer sides....
 

Branskins

macrumors 65816
Dec 8, 2008
1,235
180
Is Samsung going to "innovate" with the mega size watch now that you have given this idea :p
 

SarZ

macrumors regular
Mar 11, 2008
170
106
Why do some people want to wear very large watches
Is it to show off to other people ?
unless you've got massive wrists they look ridiculous
 

rhildinger

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 11, 2006
70
14
You seem somewhat offended that people wear larger watches...

For me it has nothing to do with showing off, I simply prefer larger sized watches. The 42mm apple watch looked like a ladies watch on my wrist, which is certainly not "massive" but probably somewhat larger than average.
 

rhsmd1

macrumors member
Apr 27, 2015
94
2
Central Florida
not just a larger size, but also a heavier steel.
I routinely wear Omega, tag and breitling watches that are built for diving.
the steel is much heavier.
I am not advocating for a diving AW, just a bigger, heavier one.
 

SarZ

macrumors regular
Mar 11, 2008
170
106
You seem somewhat offended that people wear larger watches...

For me it has nothing to do with showing off, I simply prefer larger sized watches. The 42mm apple watch looked like a ladies watch on my wrist, which is certainly not "massive" but probably somewhat larger than average.

Not offended just curious
 

KojiH

macrumors 6502
Sep 19, 2012
312
28
not just a larger size, but also a heavier steel.
I routinely wear Omega, tag and breitling watches that are built for diving.
the steel is much heavier.
I am not advocating for a diving AW, just a bigger, heavier one.

Exactly
 

friedmud

macrumors 65816
Jul 11, 2008
1,415
1,265
I think they went small on purpose... because if they were any bigger all anyone would talk about is the large version... and how it's so huge and geeky.

The press cannot possibly talk about how "huge and nerdy" the 42mm or 38mm are.

This is a first generation product so they needed to be quite conservative. I expect a larger version in time once the world gets used to the idea that it can be fashionable to wear a smartwatch...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.