Yes, when they release the first round edition. It'll be the perfect way to introduce a round watch. ;-)
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anyone else wish for an even larger watch? (46mm... 50mm... ?)
- Thread starter rhildinger
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes, when they release the first round edition. It'll be the perfect way to introduce a round watch. ;-)
I ordered the 38mm but then was concerned that I might have ordered the wrong size, so I went into the store and tried both on. 38mm is definitely the right size for me, the 42mm seemed too big.
If I were expecting to read a lot on it, then it would seem small I suppose, but as a watch, using the fitness rings, messages, etc., the size works perfectly for me.
If I were expecting to read a lot on it, then it would seem small I suppose, but as a watch, using the fitness rings, messages, etc., the size works perfectly for me.
42 is OK but I've wondered about a touvh bigger Watch. My wrists are pretty big though.
I think I will need to show everyone this pic if they think there isn't a need for larger size Apple Watch.
I am hoping the next size variant will be at least 48/50 rather then another 4mm increment.
Hell no.
I didn't buy this Diesel watch -- I just put it on to take pics and show the world how idiotic the big watch trend really is.
I didn't buy this Diesel watch -- I just put it on to take pics and show the world how idiotic the big watch trend really is.
Attachments
Last edited:
LOL I remember this! What was it called again?
EDIT: I found it, it's called the Rufus Cuff and they're only starting to ship it now lmao...
http://rufuslabs.com
Last edited:
Yes, I would like a larger size to be available. I've always thought the larger watches like divers watches and G-Shocks looked best. Bonus points to Apple if they can increase the functionality and duration by making it larger.
Oh what would we do without you showing the world how idiotic their fashion sense is ...?
Jony Ive stated that as soon as a customer wears a product they have the expectation of choice. He gets it. Too bad you don't.
I've got big arms, the 42 feels a little dainty on my wrist. A few mm's wouldn't be a bad thing.
I wouldn't be terribly surprised if there was a 46mm to go with the 42 and 38. Highly doubt there would be a bigger option than 46mm. Even the 46mm would most likely be the least popular selling model. I'm 6'4 and the 42mm fits me perfectly, but I have seen others with big or fat wrists (not a rip) that a 42mm would look small.
Apple probably hit the vast majority of the population with the 38/42mm. Doesn't mean they shouldn't add one more at 46mm. 50mm just seems enormous and would look too big on all but a minority of people.
Apple probably hit the vast majority of the population with the 38/42mm. Doesn't mean they shouldn't add one more at 46mm. 50mm just seems enormous and would look too big on all but a minority of people.
I have bigger wrists and would really like a 46. Compared to many high end watches these days, that would still be mid-sized. A lot depends on the styling - some big watches look elegant and proportional, while others just look stupid big.
I remember the first time I tried the iPhone 6 Plus - I never thought I'd want a phone that ridiculously big. Now I don't know what I'd do without it. I've never felt that way about Apple Watch - I would have ordered a 46 from the start.
I remember the first time I tried the iPhone 6 Plus - I never thought I'd want a phone that ridiculously big. Now I don't know what I'd do without it. I've never felt that way about Apple Watch - I would have ordered a 46 from the start.