Thanks. Yeah it's past time we go. There seemed to be hope with Marcelo Claure but more and more what I am seeing there is a guy positioning Sprint for the most Softbank can squeeze out of it before it tanks.
TMO should be excellent. I live in an urban metro area and travel maybe once a year. Phoenix is apparently TMO's market as they've won Rootmetrics score thing at least twice now. And while possible coverage may not be everywhere it's certainly going to be in more places then Sprint and faster where I find it.
Getting TMO's most expensive UD plan is actually going to cut our bill in half and gives us stuff Sprint does not include. Hahahahaha, a reverse Sprint promotion by leaving!![]()
I have been a Sprint customer for about 15 - 16 years. For many years, the coverage was decent but the usable speed was terrible, especially before the iPhone. Now, I have decent speeds (as a whole) for the areas that I traverse. If that weren't the case, I would move to another carrier.
If you do sign with Sprint. make sure to decide early on in your contract period if the speeds will work for you. Once you go past the contract grace period, you are locked in unless you want to pay the EFT, unless you buy outright.
Keep in mind, that many people here love to rag on Sprint just because they can, even though they have never used them, or had bad coverage in their area. So what if I don't get 20 MBPS on LTE with my iPhone 5 in Atlanta. Most of the time, my coverage and use are not in conflict such that there is a big problem.
One size does not fit all. Don't allow other people to do your thinking for you. If the phone coverage meets your needs, great. If it doesn't, take action asap.
And none of this changes the fact that Sprint has the worse LTE service. The slowest and the by far the least amount of coverage against Verizon.
No one was disputing that. Our argument was simply for the side opposite yours about how WiFi should supplement cellular data and what constituted abuse of data. Sprint's speed and coverage were not part of that discussion.And none of this changes the fact that Sprint has the worse LTE service. The slowest and the by far the least amount of coverage against Verizon.
No, because I hate sprint and their coverage is vastly inferior to ATT
Who needs good coverage? At that price, it's a steal.
This goes back to what I told you about CSRs. Managers have only a slightly larger authority and it covers only their store. They can't make any plan changes or approve anything that's not standard. For that you need someone higher up.I agree, as long as I can keep my AT&T plan. I might try going to Sprint and seeing if a manager can approve me opening an unlimited everything plan at $26.50 pre-tax without me porting over and canceling my $53.74 pre-tax AT&T UDP. After all, what difference does it make to Sprint if I want to keep paying AT&T $61 after tax as long as I pay Sprint $35 or so after tax plus $30 or so after tax for a shiny new iPhone 6? They gain a customer they wouldn't have otherwise. I'm not permanently giving up a reliable AT&T UDP sight unseen. I just can't do it.
This goes back to what I told you about CSRs. Managers have only a slightly larger authority and it covers only their store. They can't make any plan changes or approve anything that's not standard. For that you need someone higher up.
What makes sense to you and to non-Sprint customers is not necessarily actionable by Sprint. The billing system alone contains a number of lockouts, sub systems, and previous versions that prevent CSRs from directly giving you something that makes sense. Sprint exists in it's own reality and it's not necessarily the one that the rest of the world shares.
But go ahead, you may be able to get something done. But if not, do not be surprised.
Here's something that might help you though…
marcelo.claure@sprint.com
No, that is not Claure's direct email. It's the new email address for Executive Services. Explain your reasoning to them. They will call you. Exec Services is the group that still has a little bit of power to get things done.
I agree, as long as I can keep my AT&T plan. I might try going to Sprint and seeing if a manager can approve me opening an unlimited everything plan at $26.50 pre-tax without me porting over and canceling my $53.74 pre-tax AT&T UDP. After all, what difference does it make to Sprint if I want to keep paying AT&T $61 after tax as long as I pay Sprint $35 or so after tax plus $30 or so after tax for a shiny new iPhone 6? They gain a customer they wouldn't have otherwise. I'm not permanently giving up a reliable AT&T UDP sight unseen. I just can't do it.
I totally understand that and would be thinking the same.I thought of that idea a few minutes before you and proposed the same idea to "Marcello" just now. I'll see what happens. I once sent a complaint to Gary Kelly's e-mail address at Southwest Airlines after a rough experience (I'm an A-lister) and got a personal response within 24 hours from someone in customer service.
I really want to give Sprint a chance. They may have a great network that no one knows about. But I have grandfathered UNLIMITED data plans on the two indisputably best LTE networks in the US right now that I can never get back if I give them up now. Why would I give either one up on faith that Sprint has come close enough to them?
Open up a new acct at sprint with a random number and try it out for however long they give you to cancel with no etf...ill guess maybe 14 days .....
I have 2 att unlimited lines and not gonna dump them ......cuz the govt lawsuit may make them raise the throttling cap to alot higher gig amount...
I agree.
But just because I use carrier data when away from wifi shouldnt make me irresponsible or senseless
One can easily eat up a few gigs in a couple of hours.
In this day and age with the tech available and high quality of pictures, video and audio 2Gb's is not really that much when people are mobile and not within a small zone of wifi coverage.
No one was disputing that. Our argument was simply for the side opposite yours about how WiFi should supplement cellular data and what constituted abuse of data. Sprint's speed and coverage were not part of that discussion.
OK.I said my peace, you said yours, let's leave it at that.
Here's something that might help you though…
marcelo.claure@sprint.com
No, that is not Claure's direct email. It's the new email address for Executive Services. Explain your reasoning to them. They will call you. Exec Services is the group that still has a little bit of power to get things done.
That's great!I guess they don't work weekends. It will be interesting to see what they tell me on Monday. By then they'll have a good sense of how the promotion is going. From the relative dearth of posts on Sprint's and Claure's Twitter accounts I'm guessing that there is less interest than they wanted. Either that or they need a new social media team.
Edit: I spoke a bit too soon. I did receive an e-mail asking me for a phone number and time for them to call me. I said to call tomorrow or Monday. I'll see what I find out.
No, because I hate sprint and their coverage is vastly inferior to ATT
Chicago is a Sprint Spark city. However, I don't know anyone with a Spark-compatible device, and so I don't know how much of a difference it makes.
I have a spark compatible device and live in naperville. I live in a spark turbo spot and WOW 18-20 DOWN!
Ps. the Iphone 6/6P are spark devices on Sprint!
![]()
Download speeds vary from location, and I've found AT&T to be the best downtown (usually around 10Mbps, while VZW gets around 5-6Mbps, and T-Mobile gets good download speeds when I'm connected, but often struggles to find a signal inside tall buildings).
I'm in the near west suburbs right now and VZW is downloading at 67Mbps. AT&T around 35Mbps, and T-Mobile around 12Mbps.
Chicago isn't my main concern since it appears Sprint has a good network here. I travel a lot, though. It seems that in the rest of the country there are definitely areas where Sprint is behind.
Now, now. LOL!Nah, Sprint can go somewhere with that. lol
I totally understand that and would be thinking the same.
Hopefully Exec Services can help. You might also try Marcelo's Twitter account. He's pretty active and he's been known to respond to people directly.
Yeah, good luck getting any decent customer service or anything done with them.
The more you avoid their customer support reps the longer you will live a happier and healthy life![]()
I'm glad you responded today as I have a piece of info for you.The rep called back today and told me that the system is programmed to apply the discounted rate once the port comes in, and so they can't actually implement my sensible suggestion.
I'm guessing that Exec Services has the same authority as Retentions. The rep first thought I was an existing Sprint customer. When I explained what I had written in the e-mail (that I was an AT&T account holder who wanted to give Sprint a try but wasn't interested in porting out a grandfathered unlimited plan) she understood, and then gave me the explanation above. I suggested that if they don't want to get rid of the port requirement that Sprint do what T-Mobile does and let people try the network for a week and she said she'd pass that suggestion along to Marketing.
My guess is that they don't want people exploiting the system by opening up multiple accounts using the same AT&T or Verizon invoice, but that should be easy enough for them to control since they open the account in the same name as what's on the AT&T or Verizon invoice, and so their internal system should be able to track how many accounts they are opening up, and what number was used to build the custom rate plan.