Has anyone enabled the 'no32exec' flag on 10.13.4? Nearly all of my applications are working flawlessly with it enabled (looking at you, Kindle). Mostly I like the fact that my Mac is now fully 64-bit only on all levels, kind of like iOS 11.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anyone using '64-bit only' mode on 10.13.4?
- Thread starter kwokaaron
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
32 bit apps will continue to work until the next OS. am sure most developers are planning for this (for me, final draft, a few others). will miss quicktime pro...
I turned it on because all the apps I care about are 64-bit anyway. In fact, only some Apple apps (DVD Player) and Kindle are still 32-bit on my Mac. As a developer it seemed to make some sense to run full time in 64-bit mode here on out. You should run this in Terminal to see what all remains that is 32-bit:
mdfind "(kMDItemExecutableArchitectures == 'i386') && (kMDItemExecutableArchitectures != 'x86_64’)"
Lots of system components are still 32-bit but that isn’t hurting my daily usage at all. What did surprise me was that Dropbox helper tools were 32-bit... Dropbox still works without them, but asks for admin password on each launch. To find a more permanent fix set yourself to receive Dropbox betas.
I do like the notion of a clean 64-bit-only macOS. I mean, a lot less cruft floating around when no 32-bit libraries get loaded. But it isn’t something that most people should turn on, as a ton of 32-bit apps are still around that many people may be using.
mdfind "(kMDItemExecutableArchitectures == 'i386') && (kMDItemExecutableArchitectures != 'x86_64’)"
Lots of system components are still 32-bit but that isn’t hurting my daily usage at all. What did surprise me was that Dropbox helper tools were 32-bit... Dropbox still works without them, but asks for admin password on each launch. To find a more permanent fix set yourself to receive Dropbox betas.
I do like the notion of a clean 64-bit-only macOS. I mean, a lot less cruft floating around when no 32-bit libraries get loaded. But it isn’t something that most people should turn on, as a ton of 32-bit apps are still around that many people may be using.
I'm running 10.13.4 and loaded your suggested line of code into a Terminal window and it produced this result...
Failed to create query for '(kMDItemExecutableArchitectures == 'i386') && (kMDItemExecutableArchitectures != 'x86_64’)'
Odd... It worked for me, but just now I pasted it in again and got the same error. Closed and reopened Terminal and it now works again. Weird. Anyway, that does work for me more than it doesn’t. Maybe just try again?
Hmm, well then I don’t know what is up. I can consistently get it to work right now, so who knows. mdfind is a command that searches Spotlight’s index, so it isn’t new to 10.13.4. Maybe something messed up formatting here on the forum? You could try retyping the command manually.
That shows just Applications. The nice thing about the Terminal command I list above is that it shows anything that is just 32-bit from anywhere on the Mac. Applications, system frameworks, command-line tools, etc. I agree that the System Report is a nicer view, but it just isn’t complete.
I'm running 10.13.4 on my 2008 MacPro which is an unsupported madel according to Apple, maybe that is causing the problem?
Anyhow if I wanted to try setting this 'no32exec' flag', how do I go about it?
Anyhow if I wanted to try setting this 'no32exec' flag', how do I go about it?
You can find directions here. What you’re doing is setting an NVRAM variable. These are firmware-level settings. As such, it may be that an unsupported model will not have the option at all.
so is 'DVD Player'
its laughable looking through Applications for compliance... some 32-bit only are "Apple" stuff..
I would have expected the first one to set an example would be the company offering the machine to customers to 64-bit over third party developers always... Not even Microsoft can do that.
I pick on Compressor for a reason. f there was ever something that could use some 64-bit oomph, Compressor would surely be a contender. Apparently that time is getting near(er).
reasonable to expect apple will update everything to 64bit when 64bit is all there is. and i know that developers will step up to the plate (they'll have to). my biggest concern is... quicktime pro, since it's an apple app that hasn't been updated since... the 1800's or so. but so it goes... the future can't be stopped.
Apple could just always abandon apps they do see 'fit for purpose' anymore. Either add more features back into Quick-time Player, or just get rid of the stuff Apple would prefer to nudge people off to 'a new app' they could do.
They did that with iPhoto, when changing OS's.
I prefer and still use iPhoto, works just fine in High Sierra.
One tends to resist change as one gets older, say 82 like me.
i doubt apple will give us a new QT that can do what QT7 pro does, leaving us to use FCPX or imovie (i have both). but for simple hit&run stuff, it is (or was) a great tool.
wonder what apps we'll be scrambling to find replacements for tho. and am sure there will be no rosetta-type option...
wonder what apps we'll be scrambling to find replacements for tho. and am sure there will be no rosetta-type option...
Open the Activity Monitor application > select in the Menu View > Columns > Kind. This will show - not only applications - all processes , when checked in the Menu too - for their 32/64 bit in AM.
Last edited:
A lot of current Adobe Helper Apps in that 32-bit column...
It's because your last quote got converted to a curly quote. Change it to a straight quote and it works.
What kind of process isn’t an application?
Of course I meant the difference between the workaround by @alexclst and Activity Monitor...
Please elaborate?