Nope. The 38mm is the perfect size. 175mm circumference, 60mm width.
But really, the 4mm doesn't make much of a difference. It's not like iPhone 5 vs iPhone 6 Plus.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to justify your decision.
![]()
I've tried it in person and have taken enough pictures to know what looks better.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1865864/
Understood. If you're the dainty sorts (which looks like you somewhat are), 38mm contrasts you well.
I like the right fit rather than oversized. Same with my clothing.
wirst is 175mm here, and 38mm seems to be the perfect size for me. The thing is: you have to look on the watch itself while comparing the size.. Most people only look on the screen sizes and this may irritate the feel of the size.
I enjoy the 42mm case myself. Being 6'1 190lbs, it looks more fitted to me than the smaller variants. But then again, I couldn't imagine my Omega Planet Ocean and Rolex Milgauss being small faced either, lol. That would look silly.
I bought the 38 after trying it on in the shop. I've now had it for just over two days and can't imagine wanting a 42. People on this forum keep saying that they "look bigger in photos", but as far as I can tell, that isn't true.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to justify your decision.
![]()
I think a lot of em regret it but are too proud to admit it. Don't be surprised to see a massive influx in sales of the 42mm next launch.