Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am wondering the same thing. What is the scope of data that these companies have access to?

From the way I had it enthusiastically explained to me, by someone trying to sell my company marketing services, they have access to anything from any company that participates in their marketing network. Meaning a company that has information about your search history on their site shares that with another company with search history on that site. Add a bunch of these companies together into a "marketing network" and you have ALL information about you being aggregated. Of course it is "anonymous" because they use an ID number instead of your name <rolls eyes>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tofupunch
I too would really like to know the problem with the data sharing? Anyone here in the "real" know as to why, rather than just paranoid wokers.

As someone said before if it is just for Adverts I'm all for it. I'd rather see adverts I am interested in.

Are there other nefarious reasons I should be aware of? Examples? o_O
I'm not a privacy-focused individual, but for society as a whole, consider what advertising does. It's nearly a zero sum game. Advertisers compete against each other for the public's limited interest. Businesses probably pay trillions per year to advertise. That's an enormous value sink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pillbory
Read? Whatcha mean I gots-ta read the facts!

Sigh. Google is just the easy/usual target.

And people were complaining about big bad Google and their privacy labels, meanwhile logging onto their Instagram, Facebook, Ebay, Twitter, and Uber Eats that literally steal and sell your data at rates far higher than any Google app listed for overall data collection.

But as learned in recent years some people you will never convince of factual statements no matter how much data you present them.
People usually complain about FB. But that somehow didn't start until they did something that helped Trump as a presidential candidate.

I still use an ad-blocker that also simulates clicks on every ad just to piss Google off.
 
An app can track me, so long as it can not see other apps and track me there. What I do in app #1 should never be accessed by app #2.
 
Decent apology but probably 98% of the people out there don't even know about it. It should be opt-in at initial setup where you're asked to select the default instead of a hidden opt-out if Apple truly walks the talk about privacy.
I guess Apple needs a VP of handholding for those mythical 98%. One has to really work at ignoring all the media about privacy these days, and ways to push back. Or more likely they just don't care, and that's on them to choose.
 
I wonder how those App statistics change when using Safari? That was the past recommendation drop the apps, I wonder if that is still true.
 
The fact that apps trawl our mobile devices for information, whilst appalling, isn’t at all surprising or something I wasn’t aware of anyway. Personally I use as few apps as possible, preferring to go through Safari with a tracker blocker. Of course I’ve no way of knowing how much safer this is though.
 
The worst part about a lot of these is that when someone has YOUR details in their contacts and they use these Apps, that data is uploaded & 'shared' among other companies. We probably all have dormant ghost accounts on these platforms even if we never use them.

It gets worse when they have access to photos, faces, etc.
 
Pointless study. These app labels are based on developer self-disclosure, and most are flat out lying.

For example, eBay does share financial info with third-parties (such as PayPal), otherwise it would be impossible to pay for a specific transaction. And does anyone seriously believe that FaceBook doesn't share browsing, search, or usage data with third-parties?

eBay don't use Paypal for payment processing anymore, they've got their own backend supplied by Adyen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hot-gril
But a little bright spot for your day mi7chy, you can just set your iOS default search to something else. I use DuckDuckGo.
Switching from Google search to DuckDuckGo simply transfers the tracking from the search engine to the site that you visit as a result of a search. Every website tracks their visitors. Sometimes they do it directly on the server itself, but often it is by the use of "tracking pixels" (a 1 pixel image embedded on a page that is hosted on a server for the sole purpose of tracking who is requesting the image when that page is loaded).

The information gathered is fed to Google, Facebook, and others. If a person is online, their behavior is being tracked and aggregated. I'll leave the issue of using a VPN for another time.
 
Decent apology but probably 98% of the people out there don't even know about it. It should be opt-in at initial setup where you're asked to select the default instead of a hidden opt-out if Apple truly walks the talk about privacy.
You have a citation for that 98%.? Didn’t think so. There is no hidden opt-out.

When people want to search the Internet 98% type in “google.com” in the safari browser.
 
It’s the only social media a lot of my friends use, especially over seas. If I want to keep in contact with them Instagram and WhatsApp are the exclusive ways they communicate, and deleting those apps means cutting contact with them entirely.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.