Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can't believe Pokemon go has picked up so much. I see so many grown adults now walking around flicking little balls at imaginary characters its funny, cause I know exactly what they are doing. If you could walk up to your friend or stranger and battle each other I would be on it much more often I'm sure. At least it is getting people active (or actively thinking about how to avoid being active).

I feel that Pokemon Go is very successful because of its balance of being social (via lures) and casual (there's not much of a competitive aspect to it). The collection mechanic makes it fun/addictive, like collecting anything else.

I think battling risks reducing how casual the game feels. Gyms already reduce that feeling... but you can pretty much completely ignore the gyms and just focus on collecting wild pokemon.

I think trading is going to be big. That should make the game even more social than it already is, without pitting players against each other. You're each individually working your way to collecting them all. Everyone can be a winner with this format - nobody feels like a loser or discouraged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twocents
The math in here bothers me. $50 billion is 70% of ~$71.45 billion. So Apple has received ~$21.45 billion from app sales.

Source: Repeated attempts on a calculator. I'm sure there was an easier way to do it.

And the creators of open source who gave Apple OS X on a silver platter in the form of FreeBSD still have received $0. Big deal.
 
2wd9cvb.png
Keep making money, but please update the Mac lineup. It's getting ridiculous.
IAP for the win!

-Apple
:D:p
 
Last edited:
Just couldn't resist it, could ya MacRumors? Do you get paid a portion of those dev payouts every time you mention and link to the app? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Come on Google, how come you never release these types of figures for the Google Play Store? You like to brag about activations and how many Android users there are, but remain silent on your store.
 
I bet the sucker,... I mean developer, who did that app must feel pretty proud of themselves.

My bet is Pokemon Go app was 'why' it and contributed to 50 million.. Not the only app, but a large proportion, based on the fact of how many users stories we see.
 
The math in here bothers me. $50 billion is 70% of ~$71.45 billion. So Apple has received ~$21.45 billion from app sales.

Source: Repeated attempts on a calculator. I'm sure there was an easier way to do it.

$50B / .7 * .3

Math doesn't get much easier than that.
[doublepost=1470260655][/doublepost]
Which by simple math means $15 Billion for Apple.
It is simple math, but the correct answer is $21.4B for Apple.
 
which is the obvious reason they push the ipad pro line so hard. control everything and take a cut from the apps. apple has turned money hungry instead of innovation hungry.

TIL the company that actually brings innovation to the market, things that actually make a difference, doesn't innovate according to MR users...
 
  • Like
Reactions: E.Lizardo
Can't believe Pokemon go has picked up so much. I see so many grown adults now walking around flicking little balls at imaginary characters its funny, cause I know exactly what they are doing. If you could walk up to your friend or stranger and battle each other I would be on it much more often I'm sure. At least it is getting people active (or actively thinking about how to avoid being active).


Even the CIA is making a profit off of Pokemon Go. If you don't know the real root of the game do a little research on niantic. You won't ever play the game again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WWPD
$50B / .7 * .3

Math doesn't get much easier than that.
[doublepost=1470260655][/doublepost]
It is simple math, but the correct answer is $21.4B for Apple.

I've been out of school for a while but thanks for reminding me.

I'm pretty sure 2 + 2 = 22 is easier.
 
And the creators of open source who gave Apple OS X on a silver platter in the form of FreeBSD still have received $0. Big deal.

That's such a ridiculous statement.

1st. FreeBSD is BSD for that purpose, if they didn't want Apple to use derivatives in closed software, they would use GPL.

2nd. FreeBSD is Free, so what were you expecting

3rd. A very, very small portion of FreeBSD is used in XNU, which is Open Source.

4th. Apple code is being released to the public and being used by the open source community, like NextBSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goatllama
There is literally no tech company that wouldn't swap with Apple's position right now in a heartbeat. Not one. Products and all, not just money.

Oh for sure. I completely agree.

What i am saying is, Apple is chasing figures right now. Where as before, under Jobs, they really chased products they believe in, with revenue chasing not having the extreme impact it has now. I really believe, no one at Apple, believes in their current products. Its all become to generate as much revenue as possible. Apple tv with no 4k? No mac pro, mbp, or even mac mini updates? Not even small updates. Its an absolutely incredible focus on the bottom line. That is absolutely working. And will absolutely crumble when the die hards leave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
TIL the company that actually brings innovation to the market, things that actually make a difference, doesn't innovate according to MR users...
Sorry, TYL that the company had at one point BROUGHT innovation. The last thing they've done right was TouchID. I own plenty of Apple products, but not blind to a stagnant company in innovation.
 
That's such a ridiculous statement.

1st. FreeBSD is BSD for that purpose, if they didn't want Apple to use derivatives in closed software, they would use GPL.

2nd. FreeBSD is Free, so what were you expecting

3rd. A very, very small portion of FreeBSD is used in XNU, which is Open Source.

4th. Apple code is being released to the public and being used by the open source community, like NextBSD.
Plus all other open source contributions Apple makes. CUPS, Swift2, other more Apple-specific things.
 
Oh for sure. I completely agree.

What i am saying is, Apple is chasing figures right now. Where as before, under Jobs, they really chased products they believe in, with revenue chasing not having the extreme impact it has now. I really believe, no one at Apple, believes in their current products. Its all become to generate as much revenue as possible. Apple tv with no 4k? No mac pro, mbp, or even mac mini updates? Not even small updates. Its an absolutely incredible focus on the bottom line. That is absolutely working. And will absolutely crumble when the die hards leave.

I appreciate fully what you're saying and I honestly do agree with you.

However it's easy to skim over a decade without really remembering the fallout of little hiccups along the way.

MacRumors readers exploded with anger when the first Intel Mac Mini was released with terrible integrated graphics. People were frothing at the mouth when the Intel MacBook had worse graphics performance than the G4 iBook.

The G5 PowerMac. The first-gen Xeon Mac Pro, in which OS support was dropped so quickly, despite assurances at the time that it was 64-bit and appropriately future proof. The iPhone 4 signal issue.

If we go back to 2011, the current product quality of the higher Macintosh models, and their performance, is blisteringly beyond expectations of what could have been conceived back then. Granted, SSD and CPU technology has played a massive part in that. But let's give it another 5 years and consider the bigger picture from there. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexmarchuk
What's the breakdown? Independents, majors, number of developers making little or nothing.
?

What difference does it make? Can we agree that at no time in the history of software development has there been such an egalitarian situation for small developers, and that far more people in the world (including 12 year old girls) have more opportunity to sell their app related work and ideas than before the iTunes App Store was created?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garsun
Even the CIA is making a profit off of Pokemon Go. If you don't know the real root of the game do a little research on niantic. You won't ever play the game again.
By the same type of thinking you'd probably never touch most electronic devices, never use the internet, never get a library book or really buy anything, never even go outside...
 
which is the obvious reason they push the ipad pro line so hard. control everything and take a cut from the apps. apple has turned money hungry instead of innovation hungry.

In practice, the developer taking 70% and the distributor (Apple) taking 30% works out to be slightly to significantly better than the developer's take if they were to do distribution theirselves, or had some other publisher handle distribution for them.

Managing distribution of software (we'll just not consider physical products at all here) can turn out to be quite expensive in terms of resources, time, and money for a small shop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arndroid
By the same type of thinking you'd probably never touch most electronic devices, never use the internet, never get a library book or really buy anything, never even go outside...

No it's not the same.

And using the Internet is not the same as going outside. Just do a little homework on Pokemon Gos start up company and its ties with the CIA. The program Pokemon go uses was first tested by the military.

The rest of the info I uncovered was even more alarming and glad I don't download every thing that comes out of the AppStore.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.