Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple on Friday added three new executive profiles to its leadership page for Jennifer Newstead, Molly Anderson, and Steve Lemay.

wwdc-sans-text-feature.jpg

  • Jennifer Newstead, Senior Vice President and General Counsel: Newstead is Apple's top lawyer, overseeing all legal matters. She assumed the position on March 1, succeeding Katherine Adams, who had held the position since 2017. Prior to joining Apple, Newstead served as Meta's chief legal officer for six years.
  • Molly Anderson, Vice President of Industrial Design: Anderson and her team are responsible for the design of all Apple products, accessories, and their packaging. Anderson joined Apple in 2014, and she has led the Industrial Design team since 2024, although it is unclear when she officially became a VP. Anderson succeeds Jony Ive and Evans Hankey, among others.
  • Steve Lemay, Vice President of Human Interface Design: Lemay joined Apple in 1999, and he now leads the team responsible for software design across Apple's platforms. Lemay succeeded Alan Dye, who left Apple at the end of last year to lead design for Meta's Reality Labs division.
Apple also updated Eddy Cue's title to Senior Vice President of Services and Health on the page, and he received a new headshot alongside this change. Cue gained oversight of Apple's health and fitness teams at some point after Jeff Williams retired last year. Cue is an Apple veteran, having joined the company in 1989.

Article Link: Apple Adds Three Executives to Leadership Page
 
Apple on Friday added three new executive profiles to its leadership page for Jennifer Newstead, Molly Anderson, and Steve Lemay.
Three clueless and mediocre yes-men to carry out Tim Cook's "vision" of creating huge profits through selling tasteless and user-unfriendly products, just like the Steve Ballmer-era Microsoft (which Apple copied flat design from).

How unbelievably clueless of Cook to have promoted those three clowns, but fired Apple's most Steve Jobs-like visionary, Scott Forstall! If Cook were CEO of Apple in the mid-1990s before Steve Jobs was brought back, Cook would've never brought Jobs back, and instead would've hired some mediocre hack from one of the mediocre-but-wealthiest Silicon Valley corporations at the time.
 
Last edited:
You know the new designer has been there since 1999 correct?
Yes, which only strengthens my point that Steve Lemay is a clueless and mediocre hack (just like his boss). Considering that Lemay was hired in 1999, and the first version Mac OS X was released around two years later in 2001, he was at Apple for the entire time Forstall had used the most user-friendly and intuitive UI design in the industry for personal computers and smartphones, which was based on skeuomorphism. So how clueless and mediocre does Lemay have to be OK with Apple having copied Microsoft's user-unfriendly flat design, and to continue to this day with flat design variants such as neumorphism and glassmorphism?
 
Last edited:
Here's to hoping Molly has a good British accent so she can do Jony-style narrative videos.
Given her “incredible aluminium” and the fact that she can make the Neo “feel part of the family”, she may well outdo Mr. Ive. Clearly, next-generation English.

Congratulations, regardless. Looking forward to Ms. Anderson’s first interview on the iPhone Fold this fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sos47 and Parowdy
he was at Apple for the entire time Forstall had used the most user-friendly and intuitive UI design in the industry for personal computers and smartphones, which was based on skeuomorphism.
Yep, and he has hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of patents related to that skeuomorphic design, developing several of the elements of that design himself.

Steve Lemay is a clueless and mediocre hack (just like his boss).how clueless and mediocre does Lemay have to be OK with Apple having copied Microsoft's user-unfriendly flat design, and to continue to this day with flat design variants such as neumorphism and glassmorphism?
So let me get this straight, he’s a clueless and mediocre hack because he… Didn’t try to act like the design head when he, get this, wasn’t the design head? That makes… literally no sense.
But I get it, anything for engagement, no matter how nonsensical. “Tim Cook bad” and so on and so forth…
 
So how clueless and mediocre does Lemay have to be OK with Apple having copied Microsoft's user-unfriendly flat design, and to continue to this day with flat design variants such as neumorphism and glassmorphism?
I don't know anything about Lemay, but the display medium is naturally flat, so it makes sense for a UI to be flat, as this is true to the nature of the medium.

There is no 3D UI. Any "false 3D" UI is actually flat.
 
How unbelievably clueless of Cook to have promoted those three clowns, but fired Apple's most Steve Jobs-like visionary, Scott Forstall! If Cook were CEO of Apple in the mid-1990s before Steve Jobs was brought back, Cook would've never brought Jobs back, and instead would've hired some mediocre hack from one of the mediocre-but-wealthiest Silicon Valley corporations at the time.
A timely reminder of why I believe firing Scott Forstall was ultimately the right decision at the time.


Apple didn’t need another Steve Jobs. The price of individual brilliance is collective friction, and only a founder has the cultural capital to make the elevation of the individual possible. After all, he/she created the culture to begin with!

It’s not unlike a revolutionary movement: typically there is the transcendent leader, surrounded by the true believers. Eventually the leader departs, but the revolutions that endure have an ideology that continues to unite. To be sure, over time said ideology ossifies into rules enforced by a bureaucracy, until a new revolution uproots the old one, but this can take many years, even decades.

Most revolutions, though, don’t make it that far. Usually, when the leader departs, his closest lieutenants scheme and fight for the throne, and the entire movement implodes. This was always my fear for Apple: Steve Jobs was the glue that united a strong, stubborn, and talented company that continually operated under high pressure. What would happen when the glue was gone?

Tim Cook has answered that question: the glue is Apple, and the ideology is design. It is a shared belief system that “No” is more important than “Yes,” that focus is essential to making great products, and that no one individual is essential. Not Steve Jobs, and certainly not Scott Forstall.
I of course can’t prove a hypothetical (what if Scott Forstall had stayed on), but I don’t dislike the current state of Apple, and it’s easy to envision a hundred other ways Apple could have made the wrong call (eg: following random Macrumour suggestions for example) and gone down the wrong path via financially ruinous decisions.

Tim Cook is the steady hand Apple needs in a time of growing unrest and uncertainty, and as I grow older myself, I find myself appreciating the work that he has done.
 
A timely reminder of why I believe firing Scott Forstall was ultimately the right decision at the time.



I of course can’t prove a hypothetical (what if Scott Forstall had stayed on), but I don’t dislike the current state of Apple, and it’s easy to envision a hundred other ways Apple could have made the wrong call (eg: following random Macrumour suggestions for example) and gone down the wrong path via financially ruinous decisions.

Tim Cook is the steady hand Apple needs in a time of growing unrest and uncertainty, and as I grow older myself, I find myself appreciating the work that he has done.
Completely agree, and it’s part of the reason why I think John Ternus will also make a great CEO in a completely different way.
Reading people‘s impressions of his presentation after the event, especially John Gruber, you get the impression that he absolutely understands that original culture of Apple.
He gets what Steve meant by saying “We Can’t ship junk”.





Feel however you want to about the products introduced this week, but one thing they are not is junk.


The MacBook Neo is not junk.


The iPhone 17e is not junk.


The base iPad, even though it wasn’t updated this week, is still not junk.


And Ternus knows it, he gets it.




From John Gruber:
“$599. Not a piece of junk.
That’s not a marketing slogan from Apple for the new MacBook Neo . But it could be.”
“I’m writing this from Apple’s hands-on “experience” in New York, amongst what I’d estimate as a few hundred members of the media. It’s a pretty big event, and a very big space inside some sort of empty warehouse on the western edge of Chelsea. Before playing the four-minute Neo introduction video (which you should watch — it’s embedded in Apple’s Newsroom post), John Ternus took the stage to address the audience. He emphasized that the Mac user base continues to grow, because “nearly half of Mac buyers are new to the platform”. Ternus didn’t say the following aloud, but Apple clearly knows what has kept a lot of would-be switchers from switching, and it’s the price. The Mac Mini is great, but normal people only buy laptops, and aside from the aforementioned dabbling with the five-year-old M1 MacBook Air, Apple just hasn’t ventured under $999. “We don’t ship junk,” Steve Jobs said back in 2007. It’s not that Apple never noticed the demand for laptops in the $500–700 range. It’s that they didn’t see how to make one that wasn’t junk.

Now they have. And the PC world should take note. One of my briefings today included a side-by-side comparison between a MacBook Neo and an HP 14-inch laptop “in the same price category”. It was something like this one, with an Intel Core 5 chip, which costs $550. The HP’s screen sucks (very dim, way lower resolution), the speakers suck, the keyboard sucks, and the trackpad sucks. It’s a thick, heavy, plasticky piece of junk. I didn’t put my nose to it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it smells bad.

The MacBook Neo looks and feels every bit like a MacBook. Solid aluminum. Good keyboard (no backlighting, but supposedly the same mechanism as in other post-2019 MacBooks — felt great in my quick testing). Good trackpad (no Force Touch — it actually physically clicks, but you can click anywhere, not just the bottom). Good bright display (500 nits max, same as the MacBook Air). Surprisingly good speakers, in a new side-firing configuration. Without even turning either laptop on, you can just see and feel that the MacBook Neo is a vastly superior device.

And when you do turn them on, you see the vast difference in display quality and hear the vast difference in speaker quality. And you get MacOS, not Windows, which, even with Tahoe, remains the quintessential glass of ice water in hell for the computer industry.

I came into today’s event experience expecting a starting price of $799 for the Neo — $300 less than the new $1,099 price for the base M5 MacBook Air (which, in defense of that price, starts with 512 GB storage). $599 is a f**king statement. Apple is coming after this market. I think they’re going to sell a zillion of these things, and “almost half” of new Mac buyers being new to the platform is going to become “more than half”. The MacBook Neo is not a footnote or hobby, or a pricing stunt to get people in the door before upselling them to a MacBook Air. It’s the first major new Mac aimed at the consumer market in the Apple Silicon era. It’s meant to make a dent — perhaps a minuscule dent in the universe, but a big dent in the Mac’s share of the overall PC market.”https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/599_not_a_piece_of_junk_macbook_neo
 
Yes, which only strengthens my point that Steve Lemay is a clueless and mediocre hack (just like his boss). Considering that Lemay was hired in 1999, and the first version Mac OS X was released around two years later in 2001, he was at Apple for the entire time Forstall had used the most user-friendly and intuitive UI design in the industry for personal computers and smartphones, which was based on skeuomorphism. So how clueless and mediocre does Lemay have to be OK with Apple having copied Microsoft's user-unfriendly flat design, and to continue to this day with flat design variants such as neumorphism and glassmorphism?
Forstall, is that you?
 
Has there been reporting that Lemay was made the permanent head of UI design? I thought he was just temporary/acting.
 
By all accounts, Lemay knows what’s wrong but due to not being a leader was limited in his capability to stop the junk in the 26 OS releases. And I very much like the hardware design direction over the last two years and it feels like all ties to Jony Ive and his crew is finally gone so we get fresh new ideas so excited for Molly’s leadership.
 
Three clueless and mediocre yes-men to carry out Tim Cook's "vision" of creating huge profits through selling tasteless and user-unfriendly products, just like the Steve Ballmer-era Microsoft (which Apple copied flat design from).

How unbelievably clueless of Cook to have promoted those three clowns, but fired Apple's most Steve Jobs-like visionary, Scott Forstall! If Cook were CEO of Apple in the mid-1990s before Steve Jobs was brought back, Cook would've never brought Jobs back, and instead would've hired some mediocre hack from one of the mediocre-but-wealthiest Silicon Valley corporations at the time.

Time to sell your stock.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.