Having them as one word should help when searching the web...So will we get "macBook" and "macPro" and "macMini" now?
Having them as one word should help when searching the web...So will we get "macBook" and "macPro" and "macMini" now?
Yeah, surprised there was not more push back on that. I am particularly tired of "el Capitan"--blech!The whole California landmark thing always seemed a bit 'meh' (marketing team must have loved it), maybe I'm just bitter because I'm Canadian. I like macOS, looks good.
I always thought the name, "OS X" was lame. Even though I know its "ten" I still read X every time, then have to translate to Roman numerals for a microsecond every time. It's cuteness wore off long ago.
I might be remembering this wrong, but when iOS first came out, wasn't it based somewhat on the code of OS X?They purposefully chose the X, because it also refers to UNIX and NeXTStep. ‘Mac OS X’ was a reference to its dual heritage, as well as a clean break with the 10 major release version. ‘macOS’ destroys that connotation and the only obvious link to it is watchOS (and to a lesser extent also iOS).
They purposefully chose the X, because it also refers to UNIX and NeXTStep. ‘Mac OS X’ was a reference to its dual heritage, as well as a clean break with the 10 major release version. ‘macOS’ destroys that connotation and the only obvious link to it is watchOS (and to a lesser extent also iOS).
Good, can we pretty please have serverOS?
So will we get "macBook" and "macPro" and "macMini" now?
Sheesh. Such interesting comments. How about we all just call it: The Company formally known as Apple Computer now Apple, Inc's Macintosh Computer Operating System "VERSION NUMBER AS A DISCRETE NUMBER" I bet some people would still complain.
Assuming that's sarcastic, since they are just talking about changing the name, nothing about changing the UI to be different or more iOSish in anyway.That's going to be huge. It will change completely the users experience. Can't wait!
So will we get "macBook" and "macPro" and "macMini" now?
I might be remembering this wrong, but when iOS first came out, wasn't it based somewhat on the code of OS X?
That's certainly in your opinion, as all the things you note above are postive for the majority of people.You may not like subscriptions, but for the majority of users, we want great high quality apps and that's not sustainable when people are only paying a small one time fee. The change just allows more categories to have subscriptions and also allows developers to keep more of the revenues rather than apple after a year, which is a major positive.I have a bad feeling about WWDC this year.
Almost every single news or rumour to come from Apple in the past year has been bad. The latest include app subscriptions and ads in the App Store. No thanks; I hate subscriptions with a vengeance and the same with ads.
The end of iTunes downloads? Two rumours suggests there's a fire. I'd use a mix of Amazon and CDs if iTunes shut down.
The whole approach Apple is taking under Cook is encouraging me to look at alternatives to Apple and technology in general. I have fallen out of love with the tech world. It is obsessed with ripping people off with IAPs and subscriptions, and there is nothing exciting anymore. Everything is static. Music has died; culture has died; hardware and software have atrophied. The world is running madly and going nowhere.
That's going to be huge. It will change completely the users experience. Can't wait!