Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I always thought the name, "OS X" was lame. Even though I know its "ten" I still read X every time, then have to translate to Roman numerals for a microsecond every time. It's cuteness wore off long ago.

They purposefully chose the X, because it also refers to UNIX and NeXTStep. ‘Mac OS X’ was a reference to its dual heritage, as well as a clean break with the 10 major release version. ‘macOS’ destroys that connotation and the only obvious link to it is watchOS (and to a lesser extent also iOS).
 
They purposefully chose the X, because it also refers to UNIX and NeXTStep. ‘Mac OS X’ was a reference to its dual heritage, as well as a clean break with the 10 major release version. ‘macOS’ destroys that connotation and the only obvious link to it is watchOS (and to a lesser extent also iOS).
I might be remembering this wrong, but when iOS first came out, wasn't it based somewhat on the code of OS X?
 
They purposefully chose the X, because it also refers to UNIX and NeXTStep. ‘Mac OS X’ was a reference to its dual heritage, as well as a clean break with the 10 major release version. ‘macOS’ destroys that connotation and the only obvious link to it is watchOS (and to a lesser extent also iOS).

It's a device centric system, macOS makes sense.
 
If all of the deck chairs are moved to the other side it should right the company. Smooth sailing ahead!
 
I think macOS is fine, it woudn't hurt apple to be a little more consistent. I would like it if they stopped doing yearly releases and have much less focus on the actual version number, like a number of other software projects have done. This would allow them to release things when they are ready and not wait for a year to release something or rush something thats not really ready. I think they should also break apart the OS from the rest of their apps. If we don't use them, we wouldn't need to install them.
 
Last edited:
Sheesh. Such interesting comments. How about we all just call it: The Company formally known as Apple Computer now Apple, Inc's Macintosh Computer Operating System "VERSION NUMBER AS A DISCRETE NUMBER" I bet some people would still complain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira
I like the name change.

If I never hear "Oh-Ess Ex" again, it'll be too soon.

I almost always use the non-numeric names anyway, "Snow Leopard", "Mountain Lion", and "El Capitan."
 
  • Like
Reactions: blut haus
So will we get "macBook" and "macPro" and "macMini" now?

I don't think that's necessarily a logical progression. Their watchOS doesn't run on the appleWatch. And tvOS doesn't run on the appleTV... They're not really direct comparisons, because those products use the more recent "Apple" prefix, but even so, just because they might rename it to macOS doesn't imply their product naming must also change, since it didn't in those other cases.

(Edited to remove unintended snarkiness!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandstorm
I think it will be macOS 12. In the case of previous versions, 10.11 would be the eleventh major revision of the Mac OS X platform.
 
Sheesh. Such interesting comments. How about we all just call it: The Company formally known as Apple Computer now Apple, Inc's Macintosh Computer Operating System "VERSION NUMBER AS A DISCRETE NUMBER" I bet some people would still complain.

If they really DID rename it to that, yes, I do think people would complain. With legitimate reason! haha
 
That's going to be huge. It will change completely the users experience. Can't wait!
Assuming that's sarcastic, since they are just talking about changing the name, nothing about changing the UI to be different or more iOSish in anyway.
 
I might be remembering this wrong, but when iOS first came out, wasn't it based somewhat on the code of OS X?

At the iPhone announcement Steve Jobs explicitly said "iPhone runs OS X." And while it has since been branded as iOS it's still largely true – it shares a great deal with OS X including the XNU kernel, many frameworks and the vast bulk of under-the-hood infrastructure. In fact it's so similar that iOS apps run directly on OS X with just a bit of additional framework support provided by the iPhone Simulator.

In terms familiar to the Linux crowd, OS X and iOS are just "distros" of the same core operating system. They target wildly different hardware and have different "window managers" but the beating heart underneath is substantially the same.
 
Last edited:
I have a bad feeling about WWDC this year.

Almost every single news or rumour to come from Apple in the past year has been bad. The latest include app subscriptions and ads in the App Store. No thanks; I hate subscriptions with a vengeance and the same with ads.

The end of iTunes downloads? Two rumours suggests there's a fire. I'd use a mix of Amazon and CDs if iTunes shut down.

The whole approach Apple is taking under Cook is encouraging me to look at alternatives to Apple and technology in general. I have fallen out of love with the tech world. It is obsessed with ripping people off with IAPs and subscriptions, and there is nothing exciting anymore. Everything is static. Music has died; culture has died; hardware and software have atrophied. The world is running madly and going nowhere.
That's certainly in your opinion, as all the things you note above are postive for the majority of people.You may not like subscriptions, but for the majority of users, we want great high quality apps and that's not sustainable when people are only paying a small one time fee. The change just allows more categories to have subscriptions and also allows developers to keep more of the revenues rather than apple after a year, which is a major positive.

The average user does not download/buy music, they stream any song they want whenever they want on their favorite streaming service, and being directed to buy a song, when its available for for free in the same app is more confusing. If iTunes ends downloads (which won't be for a long time anyway, I don't think anyone will mind your choosing to spend hundrends buying cds rather than 9.99 a month for unlimited music.

Music has died? Culture has died? Hardware and software have atrophied? Not sure what world you are living in but it's certainly not the same one the rest of us are. I feel very sorry for you as the rest of us of the world who most likely say the opposite, that nothing is static, and everything is changing and improving to quickly and they instead wish things were static.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.