A 13 inch iPad with power-keyboard-cover, would that be a computer or a tablet?
Yes. Yes, it would.
A 13 inch iPad with power-keyboard-cover, would that be a computer or a tablet?
I've got I don't know how many macs. Personally, 3 at home. I'm on the tech committee of small school where we have 30 MBP. I got my parents 2, and my aunt and uncle 1 each. I've also had PCs, and some teachers at our school wanted PCs instead of Macs.
My older Macs have a far longer service life than any PC I've seen. There have been issues, but they've been corrected. We have ongoing issues with even our newer PCs.
I don't have universal stats, but I know what I see, and what I see is a higher quality rate amongst Macs, though nothing is ever perfect.
Why not? XCode is software that creates a file.
If an Intel Apple XCode can spit out a file that runs on an ARM, then a Windows XCode can spit out a file that runs on an ARM.
"Cross-compilers" have been around since the dawn of computing.
1. You are correct. With a phone iPad Mini you'd need a bluetooth or some other wireless headset or ear piece. I see a lot of people using these kind of devices these days so that i not really an issue.
2. You are right that the technology is outpacing what the small iPhone screen can do. But that is what the iPad and iPad Mini are for. There in my opinion is no need for a new iPhablet category. I think phones (as in the phone part only, not the rest that makes up an iPhone) will move to the iPad Mini or possibly a Nano or iWatch sized device.
3. "A Mini with a cellular radio would hit that happy medium."
All your talk on this and I actually agree. The Mini is not quite a phablet but also not quite a full sized tablet. I don't exactly agree with the Mini's existence. But it is here so lets make full use of it. It does some very nice potential. It defo does not take over the standard iPad for everything. I'd not swap my iPad 4th gen not a Mini even if I was paid to do so. In saying that I think both devices have their place in the market. But they need to do more to differentiate the two. At the moment for the average user it's smaller screen vs retina. Is that enough? I think smaller screen + phone radio vs better specs, retina and I can't think something else but it needs it.
So it looks like we have worked it out. Keep the iPhone the same size. And add a phone radio to the mini. And then everyone is happy.
So, total PC sales:
3Q 2012 - 15582
3Q 2013 - 16121
and "Research firms Gartner and IDC today released their preliminary calculations of PC shipments for the third quarter of 2013, finding that worldwide shipments fell by roughly 8% over the year-ago quarter"
Apparently they taught me the wrong math at school.
Not really a surprise considering college is an expensive time and adding cutting back on electronics would be a logical choice for many.
Especially when many applications work on windows only (engineering applications etc.) - MS Office is still very much considered a Windows application despite being available on Mac. Yes windows is on Mac but why pay extra will be some people's thinking.
Apple doesn't have a laptop in the budget range and will continue to lag in this area until it decides to go that route.
Mac sales falter in the PC market when they haven't done any update to their more budget friendly laptops in over a year. Why is this a surprise or considered news? In fact, I disagree with headline in the fact that they seem to be implying that it's because of the iPad.
By that logic, with Apple's resources and connections Maps should have been a success, as should MobileMe. All their own mobile apps should have been updated ready for iOS7.
It's not as simple as saying 'they have lots of money and employees, it's easy'. From a development perspective, moving XCode to Windows would literally require iOS being started over again. It'd be like porting Visual Basic to the mac- its an impossibility without bringing across most of Windows in the process.
The same applies with XCode. It cant be ported to windows. Even the iOS Simulator can't.
You're talking about essentially rewriting OS X in a 'wrapper' for Windows. Do you have any comprehension of the cost, time, and reliability of something like that? I'm not talking about the nice looking UI, I'm talking about the entire OS, the core of the operating system that took 10+ years to build.
Not. Going. To. Happen.
Not a big deal. Desktop hardware doesn't become obsolete as fast as it used to.
4 years. But it still looks great. And they have tweaked it a bit for the Air and Retina machines.
So? It's on schedule and will be out soon.
Agreed. Prices should probably come down a bit. Windows laptops are WAY cheaper.
That's subjective.It's better, but I'd still rather use OS X.
I could not disagree any more. Currently, for the few that want a phablet by Apple, Skype + BT on mini IS an option. The fact that none of us have EVER seen anybody doing this I think is a fair indicator of the interest level here....
I think the shrink is really the longevity of Macs. My PowerBook G4 lasted 6 years. My brother and parents went through 6 win computers in that same time. I just got a new Macbook Pro that given any unforeseen issues will last the same. If people are buying PC on average 2-1 the numbers will always be skewed.
Why not? XCode is software that creates a file.
If an Intel Apple XCode can spit out a file that runs on an ARM, then a Windows XCode can spit out a file that runs on an ARM.
"Cross-compilers" have been around since the dawn of computing.
It comes down to the OS framework libraries - many of these were actually made at NeXTSTEP and they are only ever going to work on the iOS/OS X core kernel.
These libraries are all needed for making Mac or iOS applications. Without them nothing can happen....
Not sure what you are trying to say. Obviously, the IOS frameworks for ARM don't work on OSX x64 - but somehow the cross-compiler is able to make ARM binaries linked with the IOS ARM frameworks. (Hint - they're in files.)
I would also venture to say that many of the OSX frameworks that XCode would need are already available for the ITunes Windows version.
A recall is a company's quality control, doesn't mean something WILL go wrong, it's a precaution so you're friend's iMac getting a hard drive recall replacement doesn't count as the iMac being defective, and especially since the hard drive was not manufactured by Apple nor does that count as Macs not having a long shelf life. It could affect any computer it was installed in.
I'm not discounting your issues but you're making it sound widespread that Macs are problem prone which simply isn't true. You've only stated one actual problem.
Missing the point. The era of the pocketable PC is nearly nigh. With SoCs reaching absurd levels of performance and the development of cloud computing, full fledged PC replacements that can fit in your pocket are less than a decade away...and it's a race to see who gets their first.
There's little relationship between the rise of tablets and the slowing sales of PC's. There's a much simpler answer.
New PC's just aren't that much different today to those of 5 years ago for most common non-gaming usage scenarios.
Not only nothing wrong, but something very right about using a full OS that honors the concept of a file
Except for the recent removal of the "save as" button. It's been driving me nuts ever since I upgraded to Mountain Lion.
See, I think Apple does need to do something here because the one biggest limiting factor of the iPhone is that the screen is far too small for the hardware behind it.
A Mini with a cellular radio would hit that happy medium.
If Apple were to keep the iPhone the same size as it is for people who like smaller phones, but set it up so the Mini can make phonecalls, they'd have all their bases covered without making any huge changes to their current lineup.