Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What consumers really care about are dropped connections and the ability to establish & maintain a connection with a low level signal strength. And those performance capabilities have yet to be verified.

Hope the C1 modem is successful in this regard.

For sure, also important. For some more than others. I live in a place with dense coverage.
 
Yup. I also don’t understand people who said they don’t care about speed. Almost everything we do on the phone depends on network connectivity. Imagine everyone around you is fine with their connections but your 16e struggles with a stable connectivity and proper 5g speed. Whats the point of having a longer battery life then.

Because most of the time speed doesn’t really matter that much.

You might be doing regular large time sensitive transfers over cellular but you’re probably in the minority. Most aren’t.

But people generally over provision home internet access too, it’s common to focus on speed without genuinely understanding it.


Not saying that’s the case for you, but in general it is.
 
tethering works great and I rarely, if ever, find myself somewhere with my MacBook but not my phone. I don't see much incentive to pay more for an extra data SIM when I can just tether to the SIM I already have in my phone.
I'm wondering whether carriers can be convinced (or whatever it might take) to allow more than one device to use a single cell plan.
 
5G is pretty mature at this point and Qualcomm has saturated this standard with patents. Given the expected deployment of 6G in about 5 years as well as the project lead times Apple's design teams will already be focused on the next generation. 6G is restricted with patents yet and the low hanging fruit has not yet been picked. It's where Apple can differentiate themselves not just with 6G performance but integrated features that comes with being so vertical.
 
Probably. Apple begins working on the chips much in advance. Waiting to see cellular Macs and one of the chips might be actually present in a MacBook. Expecting the M6 MacBook Pro in 2026, along with its redesign to support cellular connectivity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
5G is pretty mature at this point and Qualcomm has saturated this standard with patents. Given the expected deployment of 6G in about 5 years as well as the project lead times Apple's design teams will already be focused on the next generation. 6G is restricted with patents yet and the low hanging fruit has not yet been picked. It's where Apple can differentiate themselves not just with 6G performance but integrated features that comes with being so vertical.
But a key 6G requirement is the ability to downgrade to 5G (and 4G LTE) based on network capabilities. So a 6G modem will still HAVE to provide 5G. So Apple will have to address 5G performance even with a new 6G capable modem
 
1740120438012.gif

Who could’ve seen that coming??
 
  • Love
Reactions: Apple Fan 2008
In an interview, Apple's chipmaking chief Johny Srouji said the C1 modem is just the "start," so the C2 modem will be the next chapter of the story.
In an interview, Apple's chipmaking chief IHaveToSaySomething Bloviate said "brace yourselves for a game-changing leap in connectivity. The C2 modem is on the brink of revolutionizing performance with lightning-fast speeds and unparalleled efficiency. But wait—there’s more! Behind the horizon of innovation lies another gem: the C3 modem! While still a rumor, this highly credible source hints at something amazing and even better on many levels. Stay tuned, as the tech world buzzes with anticipation for Apple's next C3 big thing!
 
I'm wondering whether carriers can be convinced (or whatever it might take) to allow more than one device to use a single cell plan.
T-Mobile does this in Europe (well, at least in one country). Unlimited data comes with free 'multisim', and you can get one for smaller plans for 7.50 euros.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
I still don’t see how Apple could possibly match the performance of Qualcomm, Huawei or even MediaTek in the cellular chip world. It’s an area mandate technology accumulation. The other three have already worked on it for two or more decades. It’s a path toward a sure failure from the very beginning.
That's what Intel thought before M Chips came along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iBluetooth
Of course they they would be, what else would you expect to see in the iPhone 17 series unless the C1 is actually capable of doing Wi-Fi 7, if not I'd expect that to be the C2.
 
I still don’t see how Apple could possibly match the performance of Qualcomm, Huawei or even MediaTek in the cellular chip world. It’s an area mandate technology accumulation. The other three have already worked on it for two or more decades. It’s a path toward a sure failure from the very beginning.
Exactly! PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in!
 
Would be interesting if we get these modems in laptops. I have no idea why Apple never put a modem in their laptops. They are portable computers after all, like an iPad. And iPads have a modem.

For an iPhone, I'm not going to pay flagship prices only to get an Intel modem. I want a flagship modem from Qualcomm which is the best in the market. I think this will be the last drop in the bucket for me switching to Android in the future once my iPhone 15 Pro Max breaks.
 
than Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon X75 modem in other iPhones.
Hey guys, just a heads up! You've been mentioning that iPhones have X75 modems, but actually, the latest iPhones come with X71 modems. As a site focused on Apple, let's make sure you're sharing accurate info! Do not spread the misinformation.

When it comes to X71:
X71 is basically an X70 with UL MIMO and PC 1.5. When compared to a true X75 Chipset suite found in the S24 series, X71 has: No 5xCA SA No 3 TDD + 1 FDD combo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee and ksec
Would be interesting if we get these modems in laptops. I have no idea why Apple never put a modem in their laptops. They are portable computers after all, like an iPad. And iPads have a modem.
Cost, market segment size, and logistics.

Unlike iPads, only a subset of Macs would even make sense to support cellular.

Macs are limited to being used folded out with a keyboard and trackpad/mouse, so some truly unique iPad use cases (field usage for property surveying/inspections for instance) that require cellular connectivity would simply not be done the same with a Mac. You go someplace to sit down, and at that point you are on wifi or can turn on a hotspot (or just automatically connect via your phone).

The Mac is considered to be a more extensible device - it is more acceptable to have a separate device for connectivity and even to connect it via a USB cable. To compare, many people don't realize that you can use USB thumb drives on iPhones and iPads - they expect all extensibility to be wireless or through internet-based services. That makes connectivity an obviously required feature on iPhones, and a viable upsell on iPads.

It also is different than all other BTO options that Apple currently has for the Mac line - rather than just picking between a set of interchangeable panels, keyboards, SoCs and flash options to piece together, the computer would need to be designed for a separate set of antennas, which might mean a modified case design like they have with many iPads.

Finally, 5G hotspots are a broadly available technology and are cheaper than Apple could integrate a modem due to Qualcomm's fee structure. Businesses often get them effectively free because of the expected network usage fees, while laptops today are not something that a cellular network provider would subsidize. Businesses are not likely to spring for integrated 5G as a result, further reducing the market opportunity.

The option also needs to be at least marketable enough to justify extensive international network testing and qualification.

If they can reduce the cost to the point where it becomes viable to bundle a C-series modem into an iPad Pro without a separate "no cellular hardware" set of SKUs - and if that modem provides a more robust featureset - I'd say cellular as an option or default feature in Mac laptops also becomes much more likely.

I think for example offering cellular-by-default in a re-released "MacBook" line of ultraportables would be quite attractive, and they could use activation metrics to justify expansion to the rest of the notebook line.
 
Not surprising, in fact I suspect that production samples have been around for a while.

I'm guessing that C3 and C4, at least, are also far along in their development. The pipeline for new chips is measured in years, generally.
 
Would be interesting if we get these modems in laptops. I have no idea why Apple never put a modem in their laptops. They are portable computers after all, like an iPad. And iPads have a modem.

For an iPhone, I'm not going to pay flagship prices only to get an Intel modem. I want a flagship modem from Qualcomm which is the best in the market. I think this will be the last drop in the bucket for me switching to Android in the future once my iPhone 15 Pro Max breaks.
Or build the modems straight into the SoC so every device will have one, whether it's an iPhone, iPad, Mac, or Apple TV.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.