Marriage isn't about procreating. So how exactly does what you just said factor in?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Among 60 Companies to File Statement with U.S. Supreme Court Backing Gay Marriage
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
Marriage isn't about procreating. So how exactly does what you just said factor in?
We've been over this point a few dozen times. They intentionally ignore it, selective hearing.
Face the music bro. Gays can't procreate so why would us straight animals be in favor of you? I want you to share your genes.
I have two children.
And I can almost guarantee after reading your illogical rantings that they are going to do more for our gene pool than you will.
First of all, I'm not your "bro".
Second, I never said I was gay.
Third, there's numerous gay people that have greatly contributed to society and humanity.
But he wants their genes bro. Honestly if he wants men's genes so bad, he should just visit a sperm bank and help himself. Because there's a total lack of jizz and eggs in this world. These people need to get real.
I didn't say they didn't contribute to society, did I? I said they wont share genes. Ricky Martin owes us kids. His kids with his genes/
Seriously, you Christian haters reduce humans to animals then expect us to act like we have a soul and should care about your feelings? We're animals. We care about biology and genetics only. What hives?
They are his genetically, he used a surrogate mother. Next stupid point?
I feel like I'm arguing with an alzheimer's patient because this is completely irrelevant to same sex marriage and we keep going in circles.
Actually, that's what separates humans from animals is our ability for rational thought.
You do know that with a surrogate a gay man can have a child with his genes?
Heterosexual couples use surrogates and artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization all of the time. Should we let them know that they aren't contributing to the "gene pool"?
Maybe the unions should be encouraged and eventually it will evolve out of the gene pool. I mean if we evolved then logically that is what should happen.
Humorous since the biblical fathers held that the age of consent was 12 for girls and 13 for boys. In that aspect sexual immorality has been bound to a higher standard than it was then.
Christians know that a gay couple can follow Christ's Law just as well as a straight one and that is all Christians are required to do. For all things compatible with that Law they were given the power to bind and loosen requirements as the times and need requires. Sex is a purely terrestrial dogma, Jesus said there was no sex in heaven - it is exactly this kind of issue that Christians were allows to change as our understanding changed.
So yes, despite what the ChINOs say, it is alright for a woman to teach a man, to have their head uncovered in church, buy a car on the Sabbath, shoot move the Sabbath, take over a pagan holiday to celebrate Christ's birth on a day not His birthday, charge interest on a loan, get into heaven in spite of unrepentant self-abuse, etc.
To real Chirstians who accept Christ's light yoke, marriage equality is in keeping with His Law.
That's cheating. He didn't sniff her out, decipher her genes vs his, then battle for the right to mate.
Cheating? I hope you never used medical services or technology in your life. I also hope you've never used a vehicle and have walked everywhere. In fact, why are you cheating and using a computer right now?
You do know that with a surrogate a gay man can have a child with his genes?
Heterosexual couples use surrogates and artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization all of the time. Should we let them know that they aren't contributing to the "gene pool"?
Animal kingdom has no use for bad genes mating. You are killing out species. Soon apes will regain control.
Reading through many of the posts in this thread i'm beginning to think they're trying....
They aren't succeeding, but they're trying.
Yea, and last i checked, no ones knows what causes homosex. in the animal kingdom. Point?
See what I've done? I removed the Jesus bashing. Jesus isn't the problem here. It's the wild lion stag inside me That wants a level playing field for my genes.
Yep, genetic abnormalities happen, I know. Doesn't mean they survive in the wild. Some deer are born white or half white. They rarely survive because it is abnormal.
----------
lol
Exactly! It's a financial arrangement first (when you get the license) and you can put a religious coating on it later, if you choose.
Oh noes. Race cards come flYning now.
Well I've got to go to sleep. Got to go play engineer tomorrow. Hopefully i wake up free and not in time out for all my mischief.
So, you're calling me a genetic abnormality?
What would you call it? The argument is "we don't chose to be this way, we are born this way". That's genetic. Well, that at a biological level is unnatural. A species can not survive that way.
----------
Me too. at least it passed some time.
There has been homosexuality for as long as there have been human beings. Homosexuality even exists in the animal kingdom.
And we're all still around.
Someone smarter and more scientific may even argue that it helps with population control....
That said, I have 2 children.....
But because Kim Kardashian isn't a "genetic abnormality", it's perfectly Ok for her to get married 3 or 4 times, for 10 minutes per marriage.....But, me? I'm going to hell.
- Status