What a shocker... yet ANOTHER court case against a big company and supplier to Apple, Apple settled out of court with right before they got ripped apart in the court room..
Said it before, will say it again, this is nothing more then Apples business MO and it’s way to bring supplier costs down to the bare bone, but it seems to consistently lose? However I bet a million bucks they now have reduced costs to pay Qualcomm.
Perhaps they’ll use their modems again now?
5G guaranteed to be in iPhone by 2020.
No reason to upgrade this year.
Qualcomm caved and is getting RAND with an additional contract of 7 years stability. That's the reason the stock is up. They dropped all of their double/triple dipping and you can bet a precedent has been set.
I don't think you know Apple that well. They will wait, think MacPro modular. They are not in any rush for anything they deem important. This was a big enough deal for them to go to intel for a completely inferior modem over. As long as it connects and gives you decent speed. They will put it in their flagship phone, and wait out Qualcomm. Which they did.
And for their efforts, they get a 6 year +2 deal. And most likely, MUCH more favorable terms going forward.
Lol. Qualcomm caved because under exhaustion law their business model would have been toast.
Sure I can. I can do whatever I want.
And since I know patent law, readers can choose to believe me or not, as they wish.
Yeah, there is also such thing as the law. The company that violates the law usually is the one who pays regardless of who may lose more.
There are several cases where the court interprets a sale as a 'restricted sale', when the sale is bundled with a license that puts restrictions on reselling or distribution or other downstream activities.
For e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernor_v._Autodesk,_Inc.
What a shocker... yet ANOTHER court case against a big company and supplier to Apple, Apple settled out of court with right before they got ripped apart in the court room..
Said it before, will say it again, this is nothing more then Apples business MO and it’s way to bring supplier costs down to the bare bone, but it seems to consistently lose? However I bet a million bucks they now have reduced costs to pay Qualcomm.
Perhaps they’ll use their modems again now?
Clearly, you didn't read the settlement details. Qualcomm market value jumped 14.5 billion... nearly nothing with apple.
Wrong. Stock does not jump 20% because nothing bad will happen. It jumped because their earnings adjustment was upward significant due to the influx of that apple settlement cash.The fact that Qualcomm stock is up more than Apple shows exactly the opposite of what you say. Markets in this case wouldn’t reward the “winner” but the company that had more to lose, because if Qualcomm stock goes up it means that now their outlook is more positive than it was before the settlement. Clearly not a lot changed for Apple if their stock didn’t move, in the eyes of investors.
Clearly, you didn't read the settlement details. Qualcomm market value jumped 14.5 billion... nearly nothing with apple.
That’s right, because everyone thought Qualcomm is doomed, and because of the settlement they survive. The market reaction merely reflects the fact that everyone assumed Qualcomm would be decimated.
14.3 $ Billion is the change you find in Tim Cook's pocket
I hope Apple won’t have buy anything from Qualcomm ever again.
That’s nonsense. They didn’t fight it because Qualcomm caved, and the new license is no longer unfair. Any lawyer will tell you that Qualcomm charging a patent license fee when you already buy their chips violates Supreme Court precedent.
I’ve done so NUMEROUS times on these forums. Here we go again: (i have plenty more if you wish)
“For over 160 years, the doctrine of patent exhaustion has imposed a limit on that right to exclude. See Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539, 14 L.Ed. 532 (1853).
<snip>
That’s right, because everyone thought Qualcomm is doomed, and because of the settlement they survive. The market reaction merely reflects the fact that everyone assumed Qualcomm would be decimated.
QCOM stock is up 16%. AAPL has not moved. Who do you think had more to lose?
Fixed that for you.
Yes, in 2020. Unfortunately, we are stuck with Intel for one more cycle.Can I return my iPhone Xs Max with the Intel chip inside for a Qualcomm one now?
"Apple says the settlement includes a payment from Apple to Qualcomm and a six-year licensing agreement for Qualcomm's technologies."
Looks like Apple realized they weren't going to win the case. A definite positive outcome for Qualcomm.
The biggest risk for Qualcomm was that if Apple won this case, that would set precedent for Samsung. There would have been the huge danger for Qualcomm that Samsung starts selling its own chips (currently only used in Samsung devices) to everyone, destroying Qualcomm's business.Your logic is completely flawed. Everyone agrees that Qualcomm had more to lose. You are implying that the side that has more to lose can't win. It does not make sense.