First the A-List, then Vo3G... Too many good things all at once! What's the catch?
It was AT&T all along.
This post should have been titled:
AT&T Fears Losing iPhone Contract
... Also, if you see these Apps in the next 48 hours, it means Apple's been waiting for this.
Seriously? You've all got some vivid imaginations... let me tell you about this magically creature that hops around laying eggs... or would you like to support that wide conjecture with something?
It was AT&T all along.
If this happens, I am willing to bet ether Skype raises prices or AT&T's coverage gets worse. AT&T would like to bleed the money directly from your ass so I wouldn't be surprised if there is a catch.
The company still hopes to see government policies enacted to provide for the openness necessary for Skype to be available throughout the industry.
Article Link: Apple and Skype React to AT&T's Announcement of Support for iPhone VoIP Services
hopefully this voip over 3g excitement will spill over the pond
What about other carriers in other countries? If Skype advances its app, does will it make a difference anywhere other than AT&T?
Can AT&T's network handle more 3G use?
I dont think so. In UK next year we will have three carriers like O2, Orange and Vodafone for iphone. I am sure that one of them if not all of them will try crash competition by implementing VOIP over 3G. Also some free tethering will take place too to get more people in. So competition is good thing. AT&T as a one player in US=not good for US regardless of Skype 3G or not.
What I think is that AT&T will put some charges on Skype app via tethering mode. Their network is overloaded already and using data for voice is surely not good move for them.
Perhaps now Skype will add Push notification to its lousy iPhone app.
C.
So what does that mean for the ill-fated Google Voice app? Maybe it can be broken out of jail (broken)...
It's awesome, but I'd like to know what got AT&T to change its mind. Are they trying to get some positive press for a change? Is it because of the impending net neutrality legislation?
Yes and no. Apple always said that AT&T never had any part of the aprovial process and it looks like they don't.
That doesn't mean that Apple and AT&T didn't have an agreement from the start blocking such apps.
Apple never said that ATT had no part of the approval process. They said that Apple makes the final decision, which is a totally different claim. ATT does have input:
From time to time, AT&T has expressed concerns regarding network efficiency and potential network congestion associated with certain applications, and Apple takes such concerns into consideration. - Apple
And in fact, they did have such an agreement:
"There is a provision in Apple’s agreement with AT&T that obligates Apple not to include functionality in any Apple phone that enables a customer to use AT&T’s cellular network service to originate or terminate a VoIP session without obtaining AT&T’s permission. Apple honors this obligation, in addition to respecting AT&T’s customer Terms of Service, which, for example, prohibit an AT&T customer from using AT&T’s cellular service to redirect a TV signal to an iPhone." - Apple
First the A-List, then Vo3G... Too many good things all at once! What's the catch?