Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Really wish they were more transparent with letting people know what's going on when they eventually look at these ads. Maybe instead of a "Suggested Places" section, which makes it sound like some third party or user reviews are the reason it's there, they should simply call it a "Sponsored" or "Paid Advertisement" section.
 
Apple Maps is about the worst of the available options,

Google Maps generates a lot of revenue from ads in maps and can invest hundreds of millions into making Google Maps better.

Apple Maps doesn't have that same budget. How do you expect Apple Maps to get as good as Google Maps when Apple doesn't invest the same amount as Google Maps?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: freedomlinux
Weird, I recall so many people here claiming that Apple wasn't in the Ad game because they make high end devices that we pay a premium for.
They aren’t. Which is why the ads aren’t specifically targeted at you but a broad range of users instead. Most data collected is anonymized, unlike Meta, Amazon, and Google, who are hyper-targeting their users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
As long as prioritized ads don’t pop up when I search for a specific business name, then fine.

I wonder if Apple thought about this, and/or cares.

The example pic shows what happens when a person searches “restaurant”, and that seems fine to give ads for generic search terms.
 
This is bad and Apple should feel bad.
I'm not liking it either, but for one I will have to see how its implemented and how it impacts me.
And the only way for Apple to "feel bad" is to provide feedback directly to them.

So someone should craft a message that people can just copy/paste into the Apple feedback website.

Interesting that it doesn't come to Maps on Mac ...
 
how do you expect Apple to pay for Maps?
Through the money I give them for their hardware. We pay a premium for Apple devices over Android devices because (at least we were used to be told) we are not the product.

People on MacRumors used to mock Android users for stuff like this. I defend a lot of stuff Apple does that is unpopular here (one App Store, no sideloading, restricting third-party access), but this cheapens the platform for literally zero consumer benefit.
 
Because net profits of $97 billion in 2023, >$100 billion in 2024, and $112 billion in 2025 is simply not enough.

Honestly, who could live which such meager income?

It's possible they'll use the increased Services revenue to continue to build out a selection of lower-margin hardware, of which the new Neo is an example.

We don't know, but running Maps has got to be expensive and should somewhat pay for itself.

It sounds like the way Ads will be inserted is reasonable and not intrusive, so I'm not against it.
 
Time to move to some other map apps. I've seen Osmand, Comaps, Organic Maps.... they seem to be all based on OpenStreetMaps. I guess they'll have less bell and whistle than Apple Maps but if they don't have ads and can bring me from A to B  and assure I'm not late stuck in trafic or whatever... it works for me.
I'm going to give them a try before this summer....
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
well? how do you expect Maps to get better if you don't have any money to pay for the improvements?

maybe stop complaining and enjoy new features you'll get that is paid for from the ads you can just mentally ignore. it's not hard.

really getting tired of the whole "but but but Apple is worth a trillion dollars!". that's not how it works 🤦‍♂️

Thank god, someone's got their priorities in order: It's not what I want, we should all be thinking about how we can be vessels for what Apple wants.

There's a continuum, of course. It started with those stupid logo stickers—encouraging consumers be free billboards for the brand. It ends with devices we own being activated to deliver further revenue end-points, in perpetuity.

Maybe, stevie, you can lobby for laws to be passed to make sure malcontents like me don't route Apple's ad network domains to null at the firewall. Call it stealing, even. Because that's the logical conclusion of your reasoning.

...or instead, we can reclaim ownership of what's ours and stop being passive meatbags for every line-must-go-up-brrr CEO excess.
 
The best way to stop this is some sort of organised and automated way to boycott any business that places an ad on the map. Perhaps people could subscribe to a "blacklist," and then the blacklist is maintained by some small server that systematically queries the map app.

I say "subscribe," but really it would be more like "buy me a coffee if you like this."

Think about how "Pi Hole" works. After you set it up, you just don't see ads on your devices. So you make a "blocklist" based on ads placed on Apple Maps.

Whatever the technical details, the only way to fight this is to make businesses afraid to place ads for fear of being digitally erased from the Internet. It does not need to even work that well, just well enough.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: diandi
Through the money I give them for their hardware. We pay a premium for Apple devices over Android devices because (at least we were used to be told) we are not the product.

People on MacRumors used to mock Android users for stuff like this.

Apple literally explained they are not positioning the customer as the product.

Anonymous data will likely feed back to advertisers, not specific customer data.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.