Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Gutted if this is the case. Was hoping that this would be a Dolby Vision plus Dolby Atmos 4k HDR solution.

One question - surely the Xbox One S would face the same problems with system audio sounds (Cortana), together with 4k HDR AND Dolby Atmos...so how did they get around that via HDMI?
I don't believe bitstreaming prevents system audio in any way. My shield does bitstream but google still talks and there are system sounds.
 
The device you sent me to not only doesn't do 4K @60hz, it isn't HDMI 2.0a, and also doesn't support Dolby Vision. ETA: the second comment is that it doesn't support HDR/Deep color so the customer returned it for a refund.

***Edit to add clarity: my first post was about having to buy a new receiver. If you didn't buy your receiver this year (or one of the like 4 last year that supports HDCP 2.2 over HDMI 2.0a) you're probably going to need a new receiver. If you have a fairly new receiver, the bitstream signal over optical/spdif would have worked fine and you could just have plugged the Apple TV into your new tv's HDMI 2.0a port and the audio into your not so new receiver that most likely has support for Dolby Digital +, etc. Apple chose to not output bitstream audio over optical/spdif, probably because of Siri integration (but you could PCM the same way but over optical imo), and thus requires you to use HDMI to connect to your receiver. If you try to use HDMI 2.0a with HDCP 2.2 on anything but the latest receivers you won't get anything on your new 4K tv because it won't pass through.

This is the only point I am making about the Apple TV 4K

killer B - is there a hdmi splitter (one hdmi in, two hdmi out) that would accomplish the goal of feeding the apple TV signal to a 4K television, while also feeding a second hdmi signal to an older av receiver that lacks 4K pass-though?
 
I don't believe bitstreaming prevents system audio in any way. My shield does bitstream but google still talks and there are system sounds.

Interesting. I presume there is a technical reason that Apple chooses not to output Atmos then. It seems like it should be capable. I personally think it's a massive missed opportunity if so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nol2001
killer B - is there a hdmi splitter (one hdmi in, two hdmi out) that would accomplish the goal of feeding the apple TV signal to a 4K television, while also feeding a second hdmi signal to an older av receiver that lacks 4K pass-though?
Currently I don't think there is, but the HD Fury Vertex might. It's $349. So why not just buy a new receiver, see? The $179 Integral doesn't support Dolby Vision/HDR.

And the real kicker is that HDR 10+/Dynamic HDR will require HDMI 2.1, scheduled for 2018. So if you buy a receiver this year, you might want a new one again in a year when the next gen devices are HDMI 2.1

I have the Vizio P-Series which supports HDR/Dolby Vision/HDR 10+, but if I buy an HDMI 2.0a receiver now I'll just want a new 2.1 next year... I saw this whole dilemma coming when the Apple TV 4 came out.
 
I don't believe bitstreaming prevents system audio in any way. My shield does bitstream but google still talks and there are system sounds.

I've seen multiple references including, here and here, that bitstreaming audio won't allow system sounds to be mixed into the bitstream. Perhaps the Shield is reverting to PCM while playing the system sounds. Bitstream is literally streaming the raw bits from the source as is without decoding them so that the TV or receiver can do the decoding. I would think the TV or receiver would have to handle two different audio streams to add system sounds to a bitstream.

Gutted if this is the case. Was hoping that this would be a Dolby Vision plus Dolby Atmos 4k HDR solution.

One question - surely the Xbox One S would face the same problems with system audio sounds (Cortana), together with 4k HDR AND Dolby Atmos...so how did they get around that via HDMI?

Is the X1S bitstreaming while playing system audio on top of media? My guess is it only does that if it's sending LPCM. I tried to experiment with my PS4, but it doesn't actually have any system menu sounds in the first place during playback.
 
Last edited:
No Atmos. Everything else is so good. I swear to God, there always has to be a freaking something or another. How could you possibly skip Atmos and go all the way doing Dolby Vision?!?

I'm with you! I was extremely excited about what they announced....until I saw no Atmos. The ridiculous part is that atmos is essentially a free upgrade since it uses the existing audio/data channels. Not including this makes no sense. I recently replaced all my gear to have access to 4K, both HDR formats, and Atmos. HD to 4k was not a night and day improvement. SD to HDR is a slightly larger jump and I believe it adds positively to the experience. Going from a 7.1 to a 5.1.4 Atmos system was huge upgrade!

And your right! It's frustrating how one device wont do it all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evilnim
I'm with you! I was extremely excited about what they announced....until I saw no Atmos. The ridiculous part is that atmos is essentially a free upgrade since it uses the existing audio/data channels. Not including this makes no sense. I recently replaced all my gear to have access to 4K, both HDR formats, and Atmos. HD to 4k was not a night and day improvement. SD to HDR is a slightly larger jump and I believe it adds positively to the experience. Going from a 7.1 to a 5.1.4 Atmos system was huge upgrade!

And your right! It's frustrating how one device wont do it all.

Future firmware/software update to add Atmos?
 
Here is why...Content w/Apple Store, Blutooth 5.0!!! for game controllers, headphones, best UI of any tv box on the market, and the computer power/memory.

content that is seriously lacking. Unless you are in the US.

Bluetooth 5 offering nothing of value.

Best UI? I cant even get most of the available boxes in my country and its ok, the stupid search button on the remote sucks.

Computer power and memory... with none of the functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shastada
I'm with you! I was extremely excited about what they announced....until I saw no Atmos. The ridiculous part is that atmos is essentially a free upgrade since it uses the existing audio/data channels. Not including this makes no sense. I recently replaced all my gear to have access to 4K, both HDR formats, and Atmos. HD to 4k was not a night and day improvement. SD to HDR is a slightly larger jump and I believe it adds positively to the experience. Going from a 7.1 to a 5.1.4 Atmos system was huge upgrade!

And your right! It's frustrating how one device wont do it all.

I'm in the same boat mate. Had a total system restock with 4k DV enabled tv, receiver etc, and went from 5.1 to 5.1.2. Whilst the picture difference is great with HDR and DV, the real noticeable change is in the sound, and I haven't even got 5.1.4!

Future firmware/software update to add Atmos?

^ This - really hope it's possible.
 
The old apple tv supports E-AC-3 as well and still no atmos.
Unless I'm mistaken on the whole thing, Atmos support using DD+ would require it to be bitstreamed. If it is bitstreamed, system audio sounds, including Siri, would not be transmitted which would pretty much be a non-starter for Apple. And if it supported it, I'm sure they would have mentioned it as a selling point.
Have you ever seen your aTV 4 outputting DD+ stream? I have not.
aTV 4 supports DD+ 7.1 in that it can internally decode the stream, but from its HDMI I've only seen PCM 7.1 being output. That in itself means, that Atmos metadata will get stripped.
Dolby Labs explains it pretty well on their developers page: Dolby Audio Support on Apple TV
As you can see, even if you enforce DD5.1 output in aTV system settings, only thing you will get is that it will internally re-encode the audio stream into DD5.1
At the end of the day, they probably could achieve Atmos support piggybacked on DD+ when they would re-encode and reassemble the metadata into E-AC3 stream before sending it out to HDMI.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vipergts2207
Currently I don't think there is, but the HD Fury Vertex might. It's $349. So why not just buy a new receiver, see? The $179 Integral doesn't support Dolby Vision/HDR.

And the real kicker is that HDR 10+/Dynamic HDR will require HDMI 2.1, scheduled for 2018. So if you buy a receiver this year, you might want a new one again in a year when the next gen devices are HDMI 2.1

I have the Vizio P-Series which supports HDR/Dolby Vision/HDR 10+, but if I buy an HDMI 2.0a receiver now I'll just want a new 2.1 next year... I saw this whole dilemma coming when the Apple TV 4 came out.

Hopefully, alternatives to the $349 splitter your reference will come soon.
A new receiver isn't really on the option table for me - Mine is neary $2K - and I don't want to dump it chasing features - I invested in it for its clean amps, etc. In order to get that same core audio quality with hdmi2.2, and then 2.1, will cost another $2K, probably more. I probably should have gone separates!

It's a shame apple's put us in this position by omitting ports (a second HDMI or even a digital audio) that woulds have make this device work so much better for a small but vocal number of people.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. I presume there is a technical reason that Apple chooses not to output Atmos then. It seems like it should be capable. I personally think it's a massive missed opportunity if so.

It's not a massive missed opportunity because of the tiny number of digital downloads on other services that support audio formats like Atmos. Look on VUDU and try to find more than a small handful of recent releases that have Atmos listed for the digital download. Probably less than 50 films total. Those are also typically $30 downloads too, not $19.99.
 
Hopefully, alternatives to the $349 splitter your reference will come soon.
A new receiver isn't really on the option table for me - Mine is neary $2K - and I don't want to dump it chasing features - I invested in it for its clean amps, etc. In order to get that same core audio quality with hdmi2.2, and then 2.1, will cost another $2K, probably more. I probably should have gone separates!

It's a shame apple's put us in this position by omitting ports (a second HDMI or even a digital audio) that woulds have make this device work so much better for a small but vocal number of people.
Exactly mah man. From what I've heard Xbox One S can do the Cortana overlay on streaming content over optical/spdif, so I think Apple was just lazy with their no optical, no Dolby Atmos or DTS X.

I'm probably just going to wait for HDMI 2.1 before upgrading my receiver and buying the apple tv. I hate it when a plan doesn't come together lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: scott911
It's not a massive missed opportunity because of the tiny number of digital downloads on other services that support audio formats like Atmos. Look on VUDU and try to find more than a small handful of recent releases that have Atmos listed for the digital download. Probably less than 50 films total. Those are also typically $30 downloads too, not $19.99.

This is true - but I'm thinking more about the next 12 months. I'm in the UK so am sadly without the joys of vudu...but I'm aware that Netflix has recently started to output content with both dolby vision and dolby atmos, which I anticipate (maybe incorrectly) increasing over time. As far as I'm aware, unless you own a 2017 OLED tv supporting e-ARC, there's not many ways of taking advantage of both formats simultaneously at present.

Feels like a missed opportunity for Apple not to capitalise on everyone else's omission, especially with their already huge invested member base
 
Which part? Airplay sucks...
It lags and Audio to video is quick to go out of sync.

I only use the ATVs over ethernet for 1080P rips.
 
It lags and Audio to video is quick to go out of sync.
I also use it over wired ethernet and I do not experience lip sync problems you describe. I am playing them from hard disk, no online streaming.

What do you mean by "it lags"?? This streaming is not a real-time-business. What does a time delay matter? And appleTV downloads the movie to it's internal buffer as fast as it can, this can even be observed on the timeline. So in essence it buffers the whole movie ahead. This applies again to iTunes serving, Beamer for example, behaves differently.

In my experience it has been very nice and reliable way to enjoy content for any Apple device on the big screen.
 
With Airplay you are get a double dip for streaming if you are coming from your mac.
So youtube for example - internet to laptop via wifi, then laptop back to Time Machine (router again) over wifi as youtube doesn't hand off and then you run over ethernet direct from ATV... It's just a sucky protocol with no handoff to the end device. Yes you "could" run from the youtube app on the ATV, but the search and interface are crappy. If you are hardwired on both ends it's not an issue as its basically A to B only.. lets see what AP2 brings with OS11...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.