Apple announces iPod nano
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
fordlemon said:Once in a while a real post, such as the one above, comes along. Finally a true Apple user speaks up. I agree. It's too bad the Apple Computer Company has to become just another Dell or Gateway but it has happened my friend. Apple is simply not the visionary company it once was. Not only do they not think outside the box any more, they have become the box. Switching to Intel, going against every thing the visionary Apple stood for was a sure sign of doom. No longer is there any advantage for having a Macintosh. It's just going to be another old technology x86 box that needs massive resources to over come it's archaic architecture. Boo hoo.
Mad
Dude you have no idea what you are talking about if you think x86 boxes need massive resources to overcome their archaic architecture. At the moment x86 is way ahead of PPC for consumer computing, this is probably due to the vast amounts of money that get spent on x86 compared to PPC. At the moment PPC is a DISADVANTAGE for apple, their compeditive advantage is the software not the hardware, hopefully when they switch to x86 apple will have back the best of both worlds
Black with tube?
Hey, does anyone have a black iPod Nano with those Nano Tubes? How does it look?
Nano is a word. It generally means small. Lots of people are using it. I don't think you can trademark it as a name for something small. It's like trying to trademark "GT" or "300 hp" for a car.
Seems like perhaps some people are waiting for a 4GB black iPod Nano. People who want that one are not going to take the white one, and for $50 extra, seems like everyone would want the 4GB over the 2GB.
Hey, does anyone have a black iPod Nano with those Nano Tubes? How does it look?
Nano is a word. It generally means small. Lots of people are using it. I don't think you can trademark it as a name for something small. It's like trying to trademark "GT" or "300 hp" for a car.
Seems like perhaps some people are waiting for a 4GB black iPod Nano. People who want that one are not going to take the white one, and for $50 extra, seems like everyone would want the 4GB over the 2GB.
DarkNetworks
macrumors 68000
Amy2005 said:
if u just got ur iPod colour 20G a few weeks ago, i guess its not necessary to get the nano...
uh_heavenly
macrumors newbie
tiramisu said:
Actually my MP3 player is smaller than the nano, its 2 inches x .7 inches, it may not be in a color interface but its 2 GB, hot red and incredibly cute. People check out another hot MP3 players out there before you jump for the nano!