I was cringing watching him dance it about hoping nobody would notice it's an odd shape and quite chunky in the middle - SJ has been gone 5 mins and already stuff is coming out of the labs that isn't looking as Apple as it once used to.
M
This is a very bold new design. Not sure if it's my cup of tea though. Are they still using desktop CPU's?
I wonder how much the fusion drive option is.
Been shopping for a TV in the last 10 years?
Didn't notice that before (but it is like 5:30am here)Upgradable RAM (I can't believe they made the 21" none upgradable!)
21'5 iMac HDD: 1 TB 5400 RPM!
I lol'd. 5400 RPM are sh**. How much will a Fusion Drive cost?
For the 21" model, the maximum hard drive size is 1TB? Why?
I wish I could post that picture from the Forum of the guy with the 27" iMac at the Starbucks -- he will be the first to upgrade to the lighter model!
With the new design, Apple just lowered their corporate shipping costs... these are 12 and 21 lbs... the old ones are 20 and 30 lbs. Huge freight weight savings, probably box size for containers, to.
In other words, this design will pay for itself with reduced freight charges at the port and gas charges from trucking/shipping.
How many units will they sell? How much weight is saved? Tons and tons.
And the new design is inarguably more beautiful (the audience was gasping as the old and new were on screen side by side)... and those aesthetics are important particularly to maintain Apple's appeal in the design market. It's yet another step forward.
Finally, they make a point about the images leaping off the glass -- haha we will see but with the anti-glare and the flush laminate, maybe the image really is better than the same resolution of prior gen.
The 5400rpms on the 21" HDD's are just to hit a price/profit margin... the entry level iMacs are not targeted for the serious user, but will be perfectly fine for the thousands who want a simple, reliable computer for all the routine stuff they are used for these days.
For my part, I'm upgrading from an Early 2009 iMac 24", so all of this will be a huge leap ahead... will likely go all the way with a Fusion drive and the 680M GPU, and replace the RAM myself.
December -- it's only 6 weeks away. Or 10 if they really mean Dec 31.
Seems like the 27" iMac is looking like a lot better option than the 21" now.
7200rpm hdd with a lot more BTO options
High end mobile gpu
Upgradable RAM (I can't believe they made the 21" none upgradable!)
Anyone know how fast the HDD portion of the fusion drive is?
5400 or 7200? I ask because you can no longer get a 7200 HDD on the new 21.5 iMac. This is a real shame.
I think finally that laptop principles applied to a desktop computer have gone too far.
I like the All-in-one aspect of the iMac for home, and some small business users, who don't upgrade often, and use the computer for more than 3 years. maybe they get their money's worth out of a built-in monitor.
Most business environments, the hardware needs to be swapped more often than the monitor does, and a very good monitor can last for two CPU upgrade cycles.
Mac Pro is ridiculously out of date. Mac Mini is nice, but not pro-grade. Maybe the new quad-core will start to edge into that, but probably still not dedicated graphics.
But now the iMac has gone too far to copy the MacBook Pro->Retina methodology. What is good for a laptop is not necessarily good for a desktop.
Weight isn't an issue. It sits on a surface. Thickness is not that big of an issue, either, ever since CRTs hit the dustbin of technological history.
Now it is just gratuitious thin-ness, at the expense of versatility and performance.
I would rather that the aluminum chin had gone away, and just been a screen, with a computer integrated into the back, with a thunderbolt jumper to a matching Cinema display, to offer two-matching-monitor usage.
I know Apple hates cabling, but fishing around behind a monitor, or disturbing the desk to turn the whole monitor, or iMac for ports, is TEDIOUS. and turning a 27 inch monitor is not a minimal space. It isn't as if they are in the base or something, and a USB, FW, or TB hub defeats the purpose of AIO.
The BIG thing is... they have now emphasized the hole in their desktop lineup that has been there for a VERY long time now.
Smaller and less overkill than the Mac Pro's old huge case, and often-unused redundancy (4 drive bays and 2 optical bays, and 4 PCI slots is a lot. Good for a few HIGH-power users, but most machines never see that much hardware expansion.
Larger and less minimalism than Mac Mini. Not laptop components.
Not integrated screen, and capable of dual or even triple external matching monitors, Apple or otherwise.
A Mini-tower.
Desktop/Server grade dual or quad core i7 processors, minimum, upgradeable to two physical processors with quad-core, or more.
Desktop/Server grade full-size DIMMS. 4 at least...not sure if 8 are really needed in a mini-tower, without upgrading to a larger full-size tower.
2 3.5" HDD bays, with hardware-RAID ready SATA controller.
1 2.5" HDD/SSD bay, also compatible with Apple's laptop SSD blades from the MacBook Pro Retina, with the SATA controller ready to implement "Fusion drive" between the SSD and HDDs.
1 optical drive bay, optionally blanked and unused, or used for additional HDD, or front-facing peripheral port array face-plate.
Dedicated PCI-E graphics card, possibly compatible with SLI bridging for upgrading to 2 discrete graphics cards in the aftermarket.
Replaceable internal power supply.
Full boat of back panel peripheral ports, USB3, 2x TB, a legacy FW800, and 2 ethernet ports.
That sort of mid-range machine, between the Mini and the Mac Pro, could do most of what people ask of the MacPro towers now, save for a very few that might use every inch of the big Mac Pro's internal capacity, and it would do more than the MacMini, and iMac can do, especially the new thin iMac.
This new thin iMac just emphasizes the hole in the lineup, under and including the Mac Pro tower.
The RAM doesn't appear to be user-upgradable - the DIMMs are not at the bottom of the case, or so it looked in the cutaway graphic, and there is access panel in the back
I wish I could post that picture from the Forum of the guy with the 27" iMac at the Starbucks -- he will be the first to upgrade to the lighter model!
With the new design, Apple just lowered their corporate shipping costs... these are 12 and 21 lbs... the old ones are 20 and 30 lbs. Huge freight weight savings, probably box size for containers, to.
In other words, this design will pay for itself with reduced freight charges at the port and gas charges from trucking/shipping.
How many units will they sell? How much weight is saved? Tons and tons.
And the new design is inarguably more beautiful (the audience was gasping as the old and new were on screen side by side)... and those aesthetics are important particularly to maintain Apple's appeal in the design market. It's yet another step forward.
Finally, they make a point about the images leaping off the glass -- haha we will see but with the anti-glare and the flush laminate, maybe the image really is better than the same resolution of prior gen.
The 5400rpms on the 21" HDD's are just to hit a price/profit margin... the entry level iMacs are not targeted for the serious user, but will be perfectly fine for the thousands who want a simple, reliable computer for all the routine stuff they are used for these days.
For my part, I'm upgrading from an Early 2009 iMac 24", so all of this will be a huge leap ahead... will likely go all the way with a Fusion drive and the 680M GPU, and replace the RAM myself.
December -- it's only 6 weeks away. Or 10 if they really mean Dec 31.
The RAM doesn't appear to be user-upgradable - the DIMMs are not at the bottom of the case, or so it looked in the cutaway graphic, and there is access panel in the back