The Pro supports two, the Max four, according to the info presented.How many displays can I run?!?!
The Pro supports two, the Max four, according to the info presented.How many displays can I run?!?!
And 1000 people bashing Intel or any other company not called Apple.There’s ALWAYS gotta be that one person that just has to complain about something, anything…no matter what
It's not a matter of chips, it's a matter of supporting the OS and libraries included. The Intel chips are the same as the PC ones, so they could do it now...the GPU support is probably holding things back currently, and the M1 chips don't have that bottleneck. Switching to develop for a new OS, new hardware, new libraries, that all takes resources, and some companies just have not wanted to go there.Someone more knowledgeable: Will these new chips open the door for true gaming on the Mac?
GOOD.Touch Bar? Dead.
Hey, better than the AMD names.Who cares what it is called?
Those asking for a "serious" Apple Silicon SoC should hopefully be happy with the specs.
M1 is about the fastest single-core CPU but not super fast in multi-core. M1 Pro (Max) might be twice as fast in multi-core, but I doubt it'll double the single-core speed. Actually in the event they're saying it's about as fast as the "fastest CPU they could find" but with 100W less TDP. Which is still amazing.I can't wait to see the benchmarks on these chips...if the M1 Pro is twice as fast as the M1 then it's faster than just about anything out there, and the Max is going to be an even bigger beast. That's just insane to have in a laptop...Apple is really killing it here.
If they announce a M1 Max Mac Mini then they might have created the best server farm computer ever, a full rack of those would be mind blowingly fast.
Well they certainly should boost the FPS running Windows for ARM comparable games under parallels. I think I read the M1 resulted in only about 30 FPS.Someone more knowledgeable: Will these new chips open the door for true gaming on the Mac?