What makes me think a draw back is no built-in optical drive. It's like a car without an 'air' conditioner. And it's really ugly to carry a fan in a car!
Ahem.. one more thing, I think MacBook air is more appealing if the price is $1299..
At my job we use 802.1x authentication. Which Leopard broke.
So without an ethernet jack, I wouldn't even be able to use this thing.
Actually...
.76*12.74*8.9 = 86.17 cubic in
1.18*10.9*8.6 = 110.61 cubic in
So, actually, it is smaller by about 22%
$1800 laptop anywhere else will also come with at least 2Gig ram, hardly generous.
I know, I know, I know "BUT ITS SO THIN" - it doesn't matter. Apple's stock is falling, people with sense and know about how the market works know this is silly and is going to flop.
Now, c'mon. Really? You're telling everyone to buy an EEE-PC and you have the gumption to call this a piece of junk? This is a great product, but it's too pricey for it's features. But this is lightyears better than the EEE-PC. That's just straight hating right there.
So buy a MacBook. It's thicker and heavier, but it is also cheaper and faster.
Honestly, you'd think the MacBook Air was the only portable Apple offered...![]()
You guys aren't looking to the future - wireless express cards are old technology. In the UK everyone is moving to 3G wireless USB modems. You can get up to 2.8 Mbps broadband over the mobile phone networks - way faster than those old cards!!
The whole point of going small is to make it easier to tote around. A 9" screen with a smaller (but still usable) keyboard would have had me doing cartwheels. I want a mac that can fit in a purse. An keyboard-laden "iPod Touch on steroids", as it were.
- Built-in battery is not user accessible
When Apple wonders why this product flopped that is all they need to know. The lack of a bevy of ports is something a sub note owner can live w/o but not being able to replace the battery mid-flight or mid-meeting will only ring up "no sale." There will be the usual early adopters but Air Book 2.0 is going to have to do a lot better. This is pure form over function.
This is the reason why the internet capabilities on the iPhone work (because there's a huge data network following you wherever you go) and they won't on the iPod touch (because people will realize that they have to be in their house and connected to their wireless router if they want to use that fancy new weather feature). Wireless internet options are only nice if you have access/coverage... what good is a "maps" option on the 'touch if you're stuck in a place where you need directions and have no signal?Guess you don't travel all that much. There are many places in the US and abroad which don't have wireless.
Combine that with Apple's legendary weak wireless reception in their portables and it's a formula for disaster.
I disagree with this. The build quality of the 12" PB was streets ahead of the iBook: the keyboard, the case, it just felt like a superior machine. And its specs were higher across the board. Don't get me wrong, I liked the iBook too, but the 12" PB was a genuine desktop replacement. If you had one, and a big display on your desk at home, you were really set up. (Try running a 23" ACD on an iBook; at least, until someone worked out how to override the firmware.)...
Dude, the UK is well behind in the technology field...
Just wait till you get HSDPA @ 3.6 Mbps, on a cell phone!!!
Maybe that'll be there in five to fifty years?
I believe in the home your still on ADSL2! And your only getting 25 Mbps if your like next to the exchange, Joe Blogs will only achieve 18 Mbps if they're lucky. lol
Fibre is the way forward....
Yeah, it's a bummer. I was hoping they were getting enough rabid emails from iPhone users about their bizarre battery ideas ("Hey look! We made a tiny portable entertainment center / jukebox / phone / communicator / web browser thingamabob that you can do EVERYTHING with... except, it's not really portable because you'll have to sit near a power outlet most of the time if you actually plan to use it for all those things").- Built-in battery is not user accessible
When Apple wonders why this product flopped that is all they need to know. The lack of a bevy of ports is something a sub note owner can live w/o but not being able to replace the battery mid-flight or mid-meeting will only ring up "no sale." There will be the usual early adopters but Air Book 2.0 is going to have to do a lot better. This is pure form over function.
I pity you if the only reaction you can come up with after seeing something that is by anyone's standards a beautiful piece of engineering is to call it a 'turd'. What is wrong with you?