Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah because after one year, they get less, 15% from 30%.

Yes, but Apple will get ongoing revenue every year from the subscription renewal. That's as opposed to how it is today where if I buy an app for $9.99, Apple gets their 30% cut; but if I don't give that developer another dime for the next three years, Apple doesn't get anything else either.
[doublepost=1465410232][/doublepost]
And by that, you mean they are changing from 30% to 15%.

RTFA.

Make no mistake...Apple will ultimately make more money from apps that go to the subscription model even though their annual cut will go from 30% to 15% after the first year. Apple wouldn't have agreed to making this change if they didn't crunch the numbers and conclude that they will stand to make more money than they do today. Apple is not doing this because they want to be "friendly" to their end-users no matter what Schiller says. They're doing it because they and their developers want more consistent revenue streams. Period.
 
I wouldn't worry too much about subscriptions. Where it's going to be a problem is with the lifestyle, reference, health, and news apps which are targeted to the mass market. Productivity apps will most likely switch to patronage models which are more flexible for both the developer and user. It's not like these developers didn't see that huge TextExpander backlash, made primarily by their same customers after all.
 
Interesting, but what's more interesting is the timing of this announcement. I can only assume they've not got room in the keynote to talk about this... let's hope so anyway!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Otaviano
NOOOOOOOOoooooo......
No subscriptions please. Phil don't do a Microsoft. This is bad. I like to pay once and be done, so do a lot of people. I won't pay MS for Office because of the subscription approach. I won't do Apple Music and if they kill the download, I won't do itunes either. Any developer that reads this, charge for you app (what is reasonable) and if it really costs to improve, charge for a new major version. But subscription based apps will never be part of my world and I doubt I am alone in this statement.
 
Interesting, but what's more interesting is the timing of this announcement. I can only assume they've not got room in the keynote to talk about this... let's hope so anyway!

Well now, history tells use the last introduction was focused on green, recycling, and all that political correctness. Well see what Apple thinks is important this time, but my guess is that we see a bunch of Meh, or more stuff that indicates that Apple has lost touch with small developers. For certain we'll see another round of security improvements, they won that battle, for now. But otherwise I have no faith. Hopefully, i am wrong.
 
For years people have been clamoring for trial versions of apps. I'm not spending $20 on an app I won't end up using.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vanilla35
. . .
Paid upgrades never made sense. If you're a smaller developer you should be constantly delivering new features and fixes. For those that support their application well they'll succeed at subscriptions. For lazy developers they won't hit that year mark for many subscribers and they won't be able to leverage the savings.

This is the bloated Microsoft office model. Some Apps don't need a lot of new features to be useful, but they do need to be updated every year to keep up with Apple's changes.
 
I would rather pay for upgrades than pay a subscription, especially if it's software that is used infrequently.

I can understand that. If its an app I will rarely use, I generally won't waste money buying it in the first place. Trying to de-clutter my phone anyways.
 
I don't see why people are so against there being the option of a subscription. If you don't like them, don't use them.
 
I'm curious how ads will work and how indie developers will be able to purchase an ad while not being outbid by rich developers.

The summary did say it was an auction style of how ads will be sold. Doesn't make sense for Apple to accept less money from indie developers when the big guys like MS and google and Adobe have an advertising budget.
 
Subscription pricing is great. Pay a small amount per month. See if the App "sticks", keep paying if it does, delete and stop if it doesn't. It is a fair pricing. The folks who really like the app pay the most for it but they are also the ones getting the biggest benefit. The folks who don't like it too much pay very little. So we have payment and usage aligning. The developers actually find a way to make money and they keep supporting their apps (in fact old apps with loyal customers become even more valuable than new apps). So consumers get better apps from more developers and their favorite apps become better supported.

I bet we are going to see subscription pricing at price points per month of something like $1. It will basically mean that even good pro apps can be tried out with full features for basically free.
 
This doesnt sound like it will benefit me in any way.

And it will annoy the crap out of me because I am completely f@cking sick of Ads
 
  • Like
Reactions: timeconsumer
Then you clearly have no idea what all Eddy Cue has done for Apple. His only problem was being saddled with too much.

I don't know. The stuff under his umbrella has all stagnated.

There is so much easy low hanging fruit that is just sitting there which would make the Apple stores (iBooks, iTunes) better.

For example, why can't I get a push notification when an item on my wish list goes on sale? That's one thing and there are tons of small things like that. Which never get added or never get fixed if they are bugs. iTunes and all it's various counterparts on iOS has been left to sit and get dust.

And if that is not enough then you have that Apple Music debacle. Which was a mess in all aspects. From the software to that presentation. A presentation so horrible that it probably made Steve Jobs turn in his grave.
 
Hopefully they make it easier to have sample version of the app that people can try for free.
 
I might be the minority, but I stay with Apple also (yes not only) because I invested money and I already have a good app library, if they turned to subscription, the minute I stop paying is the minute I don't have them anymore, hence making the "switch" to another platform a lot easier than it is now.

I am not leaving iOS or the Mac because it would mean re-purchase most of my stuff, this subscription model is more dangerous to Apple than they think!
 
I'm hoping because they've told us about this now and not during the keynote is because they've got so much more other software to tell us about. Could be a 2 ½ hour event.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.