Yeah because after one year, they get less, 15% from 30%.
And by that, you mean they are changing from 30% to 15%.
RTFA.
As a developer I would like to provide 3 options to my customers; 1) annual subscription for ad free, 2) free with ads, 3) upgrades to new versions or functionality. Hopefully some or all of this is coming.I would rather pay for upgrades than pay a subscription, especially if it's software that is used infrequently.
Phil Schiller is one of Apple's best execs, can't say I feel the same about Cue
Interesting, but what's more interesting is the timing of this announcement. I can only assume they've not got room in the keynote to talk about this... let's hope so anyway!
Yes. He is the one insult millions of PC users on stages. He like all Apple execs are arrogant
. . .
Paid upgrades never made sense. If you're a smaller developer you should be constantly delivering new features and fixes. For those that support their application well they'll succeed at subscriptions. For lazy developers they won't hit that year mark for many subscribers and they won't be able to leverage the savings.
Yikes. More subscriptions.
I would rather pay for upgrades than pay a subscription, especially if it's software that is used infrequently.
I'm curious how ads will work and how indie developers will be able to purchase an ad while not being outbid by rich developers.
Then you clearly have no idea what all Eddy Cue has done for Apple. His only problem was being saddled with too much.