Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here is a simple solution - just add more RAM! Reminder: Nexus One has 2x more RAM than iPhone 3GS. Do not rob users of the real multitasking for the sake of your profit margins.

Dude you haven't even tried their mutli-tasking implementations. Haven't you ever heard of the saying: "Don't knock it until you try it?"
 
I love my apple products, but the hubris of Steve Jobs on something like this is hilarious. "We have a ton of low priced and free ads, which has forced developers to put ads into their apps that we think, frankly, suck." So what does Apple do?

iAds

Now, not only will you still get ads in your app, Apple is going to take 60% of the profit. Does this mean that app developers will be allowed to use their own ads as well, or if they have ads it has to go iAds? If it's the latter, I would be giving Apple a big F-You.


Apple is taking 40%, not 60%. That's a better split then most agencies would give you.
 
Dude you haven't even tried their mutli-tasking implementations. Haven't you ever heard of the saying: "Don't knock it until you try it?"

Why should I bother trying inferior solution when there are Android phones that offer real multitasking? Those phones can do everything iPhone can and then some. With "Apple multitasking" you will still not be be able to run instant messenger and Safari simultaneously. And this is just one obvious example.
 
Pausing apps in the background isn't multitasking. Why can't my Twitter app be getting tweets in the background? Why can't Mail be downloading mail from my various accounts in the background?

Why can't I run two applications on the screen at once? I'd love to have Mail on the top two-thirds, and my Twitter feed on the bottom third.
FAIL.

It can do all that, except for the last. Only one app on the screen at once.

The "services" they are talking about are specific "helpers" for specific common background tasks. Multi-tasking is NOT limited to these specific kinds of tasks, however.
 
With "Apple multitasking" you will still not be be able to run instant messenger and Safari simultaneously.

Wrong.

Local Notifications are the "jailbreak", so to speak, for more general tasks that aren't covered by the specific services.
 
Here is a simple solution - just add more RAM! Reminder: Nexus One has 2x more RAM than iPhone 3GS. Do not rob users of the real multitasking for the sake of your profit margins.

Sorry, but I like the control Apple exerts on their products, I prefer long battery life, no porn and for the most part, no objectionable material, I prefer parental controls, quality control of what apps enter the app store for security and privacy reasons, good quality control on their hardware, and a customer service that can communicate and comprehend the english I speak in the country I live in. Thats why I pay a premium for Apple products. If you don't like how Apple manages their products, then go get an ANDROID or PC and enjoy anarchy disguised as freedom. I don't mind constructive criticism when one has all the facts, but whining or making baseless accusations is pointless with no supporting evidence is plain stupid and will reflect on the persons credibility and integrity by making such statements.
 
So because I don't have an iPhone 3Gs I won't be able to multitask. My phone is just over a year old. Absolutely stupid.

I just can't wait for this contract to end.

So the new OS will bring to your old iPhone dozens, perhaps 100, cool new features--for free!--but not a handful of functions that will work only on the newest phones. That has you so upset you're blathering, and eager to end your contract? For your own sake, invoke an attitude adjustment.
 
Even Trolls can have a point

Oh, wonderful. Apple users will be forcefed hundreds of ads per day, and this will be embedded at the OS level.

Apple itself confirmed it. From today's meeting:

"The average user spends over 30 minutes every day using apps on their phone. If we said we wanted to put an ad up every 3 minutes, that's 10 ads per device per day. That would be 1billion ad opportunities per day."


Translation:

We don't give a damn if you are suffocating under tons of ads. You will bend over and enjoy taking it as we forcefeed ads to your Apple products, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

Also, today Apple unveils its new corporate motto:

Consumers = Apple's bitches. Steve Jobs = master pimp.

This whole iAds thing has me a bit concerned. While we already have some of this on the iPhone (think the adds that pop up on free apps like AIM and the NYTimes reader) how obtrusive will this get? Free apps? Ok, nothing is free, expect some sort of ads. $.99 and $1.99 apps with built in ads? What is this, Sirus/XM? If I'm paying for something, I dont want to be bothered by ads. I'm glad Apple has found another revenue stream, but if this starts looking like some Windows BS I think it will do long term harm to the platform.
 
It can do all that, except for the last. Only one app on the screen at once.

The "services" they are talking about are specific "helpers" for specific common background tasks. Multi-tasking is NOT limited to these specific kinds of tasks, however.

You mean real multitasking? Because in OS 4.0 there is no real multitasking. Application may "ask" system service to perform certain common background tasks but the application itself gets suspended.
 
Pausing apps in the background isn't multitasking. Why can't my Twitter app be getting tweets in the background? Why can't Mail be downloading mail from my various accounts in the background?

Why can't I run two applications on the screen at once? I'd love to have Mail on the top two-thirds, and my Twitter feed on the bottom third.

This is completely unimaginative. Apple should be ashamed to develop such an underwhelming OS update.

FAIL.

Ya ok... :rolleyes: Have you ever heard the term "User Experience"? The screen isn't big enough to make an experience like that worth having. And you will be able to get email and social and twitter just fine, there is still push and that is all bundled into the multi-tasking APIs now. It will be instant, and all of that WITHOUT performance or battery loss, is that not good enough for you? Honestly! :rolleyes:

I'm shocked that the iPhone/Touch is getting iBooks. I figured they would want to keep that an iPad exclusive. This will only add fuel to the "it's a large iPod Touch!" arguments... :rolleyes:

Well, I'm loving my large iPod Touch haha

Anyway I can't wait for 4.0! I'm most excited for Game Center! :D

I wasn't too sure they would do this either, but think about it... Apple just expanded its eBook presence to nearly 100 MILLION devices! Your move Amazon! :eek: :p

There are already many eReader apps on the iPhone. Most people won't want to read on that small of a device and will opt for the iPad still. But it will be nice to have it there for a glance and all synced together!

All looks really good but i'm really disappointed at the lack of a new notification system.

That is probably my only remaining gripe. Not a huge gripe, but its a bit annoying. It won't be till 5.0 now, that is too big for a point update! Better luck next summer. ;)
 
Why should I bother trying inferior solution when there are Android phones that offer real multitasking? Those phones can do everything iPhone can and then some. With "Apple multitasking" you will still not be be able to run instant messenger and Safari simultaneously. And this is just one obvious example.

How can you run two things at once on a device where the application occupies the entire screen?
 
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.50 (Nintendo DSi; Opera/507; U; en-US))

Mark Booth said:
Do you even know what your talking about? This is to replace the crappy ads in FREE APPS. Ads are going to be there anyway, apple is just making them a bit more interesting now. How the hell could that be a bad thing?

BINGO! We have a winner! A person that knows how to read and understand the English language. Someone that can watch live coverage of a press event and actually come away with the FACTS and other important stuff like that! Wow...such a rarity around here lately! Thumbs up!

Mark

You are acting like we HAVE NO CHOICE AGAINST ADS. And people, are ads THAT BAD in iPhone OS 4.0? Is switching from Flash ads with people dancing at 20 FPS to rich, HTML5 ads really as big as a difference as Apple thinks it is?
 
It is interesting to me that with the new features in 4.0, the iPad becomes even more compelling as a "real computer." If they do ad some sort of on-board file management/saving, along with the multitasking and background processes, the iPad comes closer to a real computer. I suspect apple won't go much further with the iPad, because it will begin to eat into macbook sales. Also, since the iPad is a much better media viewer and internet browser than the iphone, i wonder if people will ditch their iphones and get less feature filled phones, while using the ipad 3g with it's much cheaper data plan? Just thinkin'
 
4.0 and multitasking

I am happily running Backgrounder and ProSwitcher on my jailbroken 3GS, daily tapping the power of "true" multitasking and the way Apple should've done it IMHO..

It must be the user's choice what should and should not be running in parallel - not the developers or Apple.. At least it should be configurable from Settings, i.e. the Apple way of doing it or the _expected_.

Still, my right brain arguing for this-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction can't stand the fight with my left one screaming FAIL...

Unified inbox for Mail is great though.. The work for app folders is something Apple will probably do better than any "free" alternative there already is.
 
I am really glad I returned my n1 a couple of days ago. This update is going to blow all other phone software out of the water. I also can't wait for the new iPhone hardware. Fingers are crossed for this summer where I will be first in line.
 
iPad Fall = Apple Fail .... grrr.... also the continued over use of the Home button amazes me - hope multitasking is implimented in a software only way with the iPad.

Remember everytime the home button is pressed its closer to hardware death - because once the only moving part breaks .... its off to the repair shop.

Yeah, just like that enter/return key on your computer keyboard keeps suffering hardware death! Damn Apple, when are they going to come out with a keyboard that detects when I'm done with a paragraph without me having to hit the enter/return key? grrr.... I just know my enter/return key is going to fail any year now!

Mark
 
You keep saying this, but in reality you can't. The 3g is often out of RAM without multitasking (hence the slowdowns people experience all the time). In the best-case situation you can jailbreak and run 1 3rd party app in the background, but it will still quit unexpectedly when the phone runs out of RAM. It's not BS, no matter how much you keep saying it.

+1

My iPhone 3G continually chugs, sometimes even while scrolling through the apps on the home screen. It only has 128Mb of RAM, and with apps like iStat you can see how little that really is. My iPhone currently has 1Mb free and 13Mb inactive. You telling me I can run multitasking with 14Mb of RAM free (plus all the other new stuff in OS 4.0)? Apple's work around would have to be a miracle.
 
great. no multi tasking for first gen. phone. i don't want the new phone, but i want to multi-task, demmit. i reeeealy like the metal case. it doesn't seem to affect my reception. it's rare that i drop it but if the case were plastic, it would have cracked/broke by now (a case would hide it and i don't want that, it looks too good). i don't really care about 3g (not available where i live anyways) or gps. video would be nice but i don't want to jailbreak what i've got to get it. wish it had more memory but i can work with that i've got.

i see it happening, though. having to upgrade. gonna cost me more for data plan, too (i'm paying $20 mo).

crap. wonder how long i can hold out.
 
How can you run two things at once on a device where the application occupies the entire screen?

Well, there are many possible solutions: pop ups, splitting the screen etc. It's even more ridiculous for iPad where there is plenty of screen real estate.

Even if only one app is shown on the screen, if other applications were allowed to run, then if you switched from one to another you'd be able to see up-to-date information.
 
Wirelessly posted (Opera/9.50 (Nintendo DSi; Opera/507; U; en-US))

ppdix said:
BS update... These things and more have been available on Jailbroken iphones for months now... Multitasking, Folders, Search...

This is nothing radical. And, to me, not worth of a full version update label... 3.5 is more like it. :mad:

YOU READ MY THOUGHTS!!!!
 
When I read "folders", my first thought was about a new file system. Syncing everything over iTunes isn't the best way to do it... But unfortunately, it stays unchanged :(
 
I am really glad I returned my n1 a couple of days ago. This update is going to blow all other phone software out of the water. I also can't wait for the new iPhone hardware. Fingers are crossed for this summer where I will be first in line.

Are you sure you returned you n1? because your signature says that you have iPhone :) Also, keep in mind that at today's presentation nothing was said about ability of new SDK to support higher/different resolution which indicates that the chances of iPhone getting better screen are slim.
 
How about this? Apple could have allowed the user to choose any four apps that would have background access at any one time. They could have even included a simple multitasking slider control, to allow the user to choose between greater battery life at one side to greater performance on the other. Nice and simple, and a great compromise so the user doesn't end up having to quit applications like they do on Android.

What you think of as "nice and simple", and what say my wife would call "nice and simple" are not the same thing. What Apple has done here achieves a lot of good things: Any application can stay running without _any_ battery drain if it doesn't need to do any work in the background. That's good. For apps that need to do work in the background, there are APIs for them to use, and Apple can and will check whether their power use is acceptable. So you will get multi-tasking at very little cost.
 
Well, there are many possible solutions: pop ups, splitting the screen etc. It's even more ridiculous for iPad where there is plenty of screen real estate.

Even if only one app is shown on the screen, if other applications were allowed to run, then if you switched from one to another you'd be able to see up-to-date information.

What the heck splitting the screen, it's a freak phone. Do the task and move on to the next one. I have an original EDGE iPhone and their multi-tasking implementation if it works the way they presented will solve all my gripes with the phone. I will gladly upgrade to a new phone this summer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.