Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So M3 Pro lost 2 P cores and added 2 E cores. On top of it has less memory bandwidth as well. M3 Max also has 2 versions and lower version has less bandwidth than M2 Max. I dont think there is any CPU performance uplift when you compare M2 Pro/Max with M3 counterparts unless you upgrade to highest end M3 Max. I wonder why Apple regressed their chips so much. We could blame it on N3B yield issues but they could have instead used N4P which is similar in performance and probably clocks better.

I would think M2 Pro/Max on sale would be better buys at this point.
but then they couldn't market it as first CPU with 3nm process
3nm has been a disappointment for both iPhone and Macs so far
no idea why
 
True. This also comes down to the efficiency cores. The M3 Pro has 6 efficiency cores and 6 performance cores in the 12 core version and the M3 Max has only 4 efficiency cores in all configurations with a maximum of 12 performance cores. The M3 Max can have as many performance cores as the M3 Pro can have in total cores. That's going to widen the gap in performance between the two SoC's. While the M3 Pros are minor updates, the M3 Max changes are much more significant. Unless you're upgrading from Intel, do not buy an M3 Pro model. Get the M3 Max instead.
yep
M3 Pro is basically designed as an upsell for M3 Max chips
disappointing but oh well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
So the they’ve changed the screen as well? 1000nit sdr brightness or are they just removing some limit on the same panel? I’ve wondered if doing the brightness software mod would damage my M1 Pro 14” it or not.
 
”Scary Fast” and “Scary Expensive” should have been the by line. Basically the same machines with faster silicon and a black option. Am I really understanding this correctly? My wife and I nearly fell off our chairs laughing when we watched Apple enthuse over the new color option. It was comical the amount of screen time and enthusiasm given to a new color. I am sorry, but although these are very powerful machines they are not something I can get excited about and my wife and I are not running into serious performance issues with our M1 Pro and M1 Max 16” machines. If you are on a 2019 Intel machine these are a no brainer to consider, maybe, although I would look at the previous generation M1 and M2 based machines for much much better value.

This event seemed rushed and ill considered. The new 3 nm technology in the M3 series of chips is groundbreaking but we need more than this for a new machine. Plus they fluffed the much needed peripheral upgrades (mouse design is ludicrous and they need to replace the lightening cables) and iMac spec bump. Overall an odd announcement and lacking anything really exciting unfortunately. I know the engineers working on the M3 must be annoyed by such comments but new laptops and desktops need more than 'just be faster than before', for the customer to be enthused to upgrade and go through the pain of moving into a new machine while realizing their old 2 or 3 year old machine is worth virtually nothing in part exchange.
 
Last edited:
”Scary Fast” and “Scary Expensive” should have been the by line. Basically the same machines with faster silicon and a black option. Am I really understanding this correctly? My wife nearly fell off our chairs laughing when we watched Apple enthuse over the new color option. It was comical the amount screen time and enthusiasm given to a new color. I am sorry but although theses are very powerful machines they are not something I can get excited about and my wife and I are not running into serious performance issues with our M1 Pro and M1 Max 16” machines. If you are on a 2019 Intel machine these are a no brainer to consider, maybe, although I would look at the previous generation M1 and M2 based machines for much much better value.

This event seemed rushed and ill considered. The new 3 nm technology in the M3 series of chips is groundbreaking but we need more than this for a new machine. Plus they fluffed the much needed peripheral upgrades (mouse design is ludicrous and they need to replace the lightening cables) and iMac spec bump. Overall an odd announcement and lacking anything really exciting unfortunately. I know the engineers working on the M3 must be annoyed by such comments but new laptops and desktops need more than just faster than before the customer can be enthused to upgrade and go through the pain of moving into a new machine while realizing their old machine is worth virtually nothing in part exchange.
Anything else you want to whine about?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Honestly I hate the 1 external monitor support "policy". I understand it's for market segmentation but a "Pro" device should integrate with your workflow seamlessly. I also have to say that the multiple external monitor support on the M1 Pro isn't that great....
I honestly rather get the base M chips for the power efficiency, but the low maximum memory and the number of ports (and how they're all on one side) made them undesirable.
 
M2 Pro Macbook Pro and M2 Pro Mac mini owner. Zero concern about the release of the M3. I buy computers based on my workflow, not on benchmarks.
Depends on how long you keep your devices. M3 means at least one more year of macOS support.
 
I am really tired of hearing about these mythical 12GB RAM increments people thought was coming - as if they knew what Apple was cooking up. Many of you were all wrong.

Quit whining about 8GB RAM - IT IS the Apple way, and YOU WILL help solidify their $3 Trillion worth by purchasing RAM upgrades - just as I did with my 16GB M2 MBA.

And, 18GB is just weird Apple - no one saw that one coming.

TRUTH.

[EDIT: Truth hurts - and obviously you know it, as evidenced by every dislike you give me.]
 
Last edited:
not even for those ... the only thing that would make me think about upgrading is the said native multiple external display support

SSD speed cut in half isn't really appealing to me either :)

... I will happily use the M1 air until it dies or some employer handles me a MB Pro ...

Is SSD speed going to be reduced as well on all M3 models?

I would love to know if anyone has an actual speed number.
 
It's a testament to how much I love the M series chips, because these M3's are out, they are clearly faster than my M1 Max, but the chip is so powerful I suffer no lack in my workflows, and don't really feel the need to update. In days of old, I'd break out into a fever and do all types of mental gymnastics to be able to upgrade. I just don't feel the need for a while yet. For all you M3 buyers, I hope you enjoy them! The MBP lineup is Apple's best Mac yet IMO.
 
Is SSD speed going to be reduced as well on all M3 models?

I would love to know if anyone has an actual speed number.
last thing I'd expect from Apple is to go back to "full speed" SSD config for base models...

the machines are getting worse...

as someone wrote before ... 8GB RAM was the base for 2011 MPB ... and it supported more than one external display natively ... same with the Air actually for the displaything

... having a 2000€ "Pro" laptop with 8GB RAM and one external display support in 2023 is just an abomination
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
Just like they raised the base RAM on the M3 Pro from 16 to 18 GB, they could have easily done the same to the entry M3 model and increase it from 8 GB to 10 GB, which would have been somewhat more palatable.
 
Finally an upgrade to my 2020 Intel MBA - it's struggling under daily workloads at this point, and forget about doing any meaningful video editing (which has returned to my world for the first time in a decade). Grateful to the forums here regarding some of the finer details on the M3 Max chips: I configured a "blackbook" MBP model with the high-end M3 Max CPU and cut back on RAM (don't really need 96GB or 128GB). Should be "enough" for the foreseeable future - If I got almost 4 years out of the MBA, this one will hopefully take me to 2030 before it times out.
 
Honestly, Apple has lost me with regards to their specs at this point, though this isn't specifically M3 related.

I'm pretty geeky but not super tech spec-y. I no longer know too much about what the differences between how many cores for GPU and cores for CPU really mean in practical terms. GB for RAM and GB for SSD I get. But cores?

I don't think I'm the typical everyday person, but certainly not as techy as most of you on Macrumors would be. I see 8 cores vs. 16 cores and I'm like, "So? What does that mean?"

I'm looking at comparing the M3 vs. M3 Pro and looking at cores and am not making sense of this. The only thing I know is if I were to upgrade (which I won't) definitely don't want 8gb RAM and I know 512GB SSD is too small. Will want something above 8GB RAM and at least 1TB SSD.
 
This thread is made up of some of the biggest whiners I have ever read. I wish we go back to the days when Apple was more niche and we had less of these complainers.
Well, if you give a 2000 euro "Pro" machine 8GB of ram (which was already standard in the base MBP from 2014!), support for only 1 external screen, and upgrades cost at least 4 times as much as you would pay as a consumer for the part (SSD or Ram) itself, people will be complaining. But yes, let's just cheer Apple on. With the limited external screen support and 8GB starting ram, for which "pro" is this MBP?
 
M1 came out barely three years ago. I highly doubt many people will need to upgrade.

I have an M1 and no real reason to upgrade but am considering it. Too bad they dropped Space Grey as I prefer it to Black or Silver.
 
Well, if you give a 2000 euro "Pro" machine 8GB of ram (which was already standard in the base MBP from 2014!), support for only 1 external screen, and upgrades cost at least 4 times as much as you would pay as a consumer for the part (SSD or Ram) itself, people will be complaining. But yes, let's just cheer Apple on. With the limited external screen support and 8GB starting ram, for which "pro" is this MBP?

One who doesn't need 2 external screens, wants HDMI/SD Card built in and an M3 chip with a better display?

This is for the base M3, though. The previous M1/M2 14” MBPs had the Pro chips.

I'm guessing the M2 13 MBP just didn't sell enough so they decided to dump it and use the base M3 in a 14 inch to replace it. My guess is many potential 13" MBP buyers will just buy the new M3 MBP; which now is a better deal than in the old 13" MBA/MBP since it now has the M3 instead of M2.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.