I'm not sure I see the point without an updated Cinema Display.
Half right. 4 GB RAM standard on the $499 model; higher models come with 8 GB.
500 GB spinning drive standard on the $499 model, 1 TB spinning drive on the middle model, Fusion drive on the high-end model.
And yes, no quad-core, not even CTO. 1.4 GHz i5 on the base model (same as the MacBook Air and ultra-low end iMac,) up to 3 GHz i7 CTO. All dual-core.
Damn. I was looking forward to getting one for use as a VM server. With two Thunderbolt ports, I could have two 10GbE ports, one for each of two VMs. But with only dual-core, can't do much with it with multiple VMs.
No longer offer a "server" SKU, either. So if I want a headless quad-core Mac server, I now have to buy a $3000 Mac Pro. (Or buy an iMac and have it take up all the space of the display...)
Is 100$ cheaper. Most Mini's users chose it because is a cheap Mac, so this is a good news for them.
Let's wait and see if the RAM is soldered or not. If you can still replace RAM after market the new Mini is not bad at all, you lose the 4 core upgrade but gain 100$.
It has and it really makes Mac's more accessible now.If the price drops to £399 over here in the UK then it could be a HUGE hit.
Uh, the quad core version pretty much was.
Let's face it, the upgraded graphics aren't going to make or break most Mini users. And Haswell's performance improvement over Ivy Bridge isn't anything to be noticed. Thunderbolt 2 is an improvement, but really how many people are in the boat where they have devices that would benefit from a TB2 connection and are Mini users?
The PCIe SSD interface is a good improvement as well -- assuming that Apple doesn't cheap out on the actual SSD they connect in there.
So all that aside, the new top of the line configurable Mac mini is a 3GHz *dual* core i7. In single threaded apps, it will beat out the previous top of the time Mac mini at 2.6GHz. But that previous mini has an extra 2 processors (real cores, not hyper threaded -- it has those too, but since it's a 4 core CPU, it has 4 hyper-threaded cores as well and looks like an 8 core CPU to the OS). Those extra two processors will more than make up the 400MHz difference between the old core and the new core.
I know it seems odd, but there are quite a few people where the old mini was actually a really good system for their needs. And the new mini is no longer a good system for their needs. The prior gen mini was a very good developer machine -- I was able to do everything I needed for iOS development on it, along with the ability to run some Linux VMs if needed and even some light gaming. It was a very good machine.
And because it didn't have soldered down RAM (still unconfirmed for the new model, but looking likely) and a proprietary SSD, it was fairly easy to take the maxed out CPU model and upgrade it yourself. My mini has a quad i7 @ 2.6GHz, 16GB of RAM and a custom fusion drive made up of the 1TB drive that came with it and a 256GB Samsung 840 Pro. That machine cost *less* than the dual i7 @ 3GHz model with 16GB and fusion drive that you can buy today (and Apple's fusion drive usually comes with a 128GB SSD, not the 256GB that I have).
Let's call it about 40% less powerful for $100 more. Does that sound like a good upgrade?
I am rather disappointed.
- At work we have several Mac Mini servers. This has been discontinued apparently.
- At home I was hoping to get a new Mini with 4K support. But this won't work either.Maybe the next iteration 2 years from now...
If the soldered RAM is also true, then this is an even bigger let-down.
If there is a new cinema display in the making, then it will be unusable with the mini anyway. Mini can't handle anything above 2560x1600 and still have usable frame rates. Next Cinema Display will probably be 5K.
A live chat guys says the RAM is soldered and you cannot add a second HDD/SSD (to make a fusion drive). The guys even said that removing the bottom plate will void the warranty (I am not sure if he knew whether the bottom of the new mini can be removed.)
I guess I have to wait for iFixit to find out more about the inside.
It's orgasmic. Just give me the base model I will (AND CAN) upgrade the rest myself![]()
Where do you see that? The 2011 and whatever came after it have a lid at the bottom where you can just unsnap the existing RAM and replace it.
It's at least a $100 lamer.Is 100$ cheaper. Most Mini's users chose it because is a cheap Mac, so this is a good news for them.
Let's wait and see if the RAM is soldered or not. If you can still replace RAM after market the new Mini is not bad at all, you lose the 4 core upgrade but gain 100$.
vote with your wallet and don't buy this crap.
while the style and performance of the keynote was great, i am still puzzled by the tagline "it's been way too long".
they have stripped the entry macbook pros of dedicated gpus many years ago, imacs followed and now they further cripple imacs and mac mini entry pricepoints with 1.4ghz i5 cpus. it's pathetic. this performance/price structuring is tims doing. that's where he is coming from.
tim is talking the whole frigging time about selling and numbers. and then he quickly adds how important the user experience is. unconvincing. unpolished software everywhere.
Yay for the new Haswell minis! Not sure I'd like the 1.4GHz model though...
hmm no display port/firewire i wonder how we will be connecting VGA/DVI monitors now.
unless we're forced to go HDMI. i don't mind, but then per say if you're upgrading your whole office, its going to force you to buy all new monitors.
vote with your wallet and don't buy this crap.
while the style and performance of the keynote was great, i am still puzzled by the tagline "it's been way too long".
they have stripped the entry macbook pros of dedicated gpus many years ago, imacs followed and now they further cripple imacs and mac mini entry pricepoints with 1.4ghz i5 cpus. it's pathetic. this performance/price structuring is tims doing. that's where he is coming from.
tim is talking the whole frigging time about selling and numbers. and then he quickly adds how important the user experience is. unconvincing. unpolished software everywhere.
I live chatted with Apple Apple 3 different times yesterday and none of their responses matched. They have NO CLUE.
#1 it is the same Form Factor with a removable bottom plate
#2 removing a cover does not void warranties unless they put tape/sticker indicating so. I have never seen Apple do this with any product.
#3 In the United States, they can NOT legally void a warranty if you replace a common part like a drive or RAM. They only voiding they can do is based on you causing damage to the machine which is not likely during a RAM or hard drive upgrade.
I find that in Apple Stores and when chatting or talking to Apple employees, VERY FEW really have a clue. Occasionally you can get someone that is knowledgable but in general, they are reading scripts or in the case of voiding warranties, they are just flat making it up.