Don't overlook the single-die 6 core.
It's the fastest (clock-speed wise), hopefully it will be the meal ticket for those who've held on to old machines for too long (like me.)
Also, Apple's own previous-generation-8-cores vs. next-generation-12-cores graphs show diminishing returns on speed, or at least a pretty even cost increment per new cpu core.
I think 6 Core machines with maxed out RAM will be of far greater benefit to our post production workflow (for video) than a 12 cores and a decent replacement for the first-gen quads we still have in use.
Lack of eSATA and USB3 is disappointing though. However, expecting 12-core configurations to cost the same or "not-much-more" than current 8-core configurations is a bit, well, shortsighted. Those things are pricey.
It's the fastest (clock-speed wise), hopefully it will be the meal ticket for those who've held on to old machines for too long (like me.)
Also, Apple's own previous-generation-8-cores vs. next-generation-12-cores graphs show diminishing returns on speed, or at least a pretty even cost increment per new cpu core.
I think 6 Core machines with maxed out RAM will be of far greater benefit to our post production workflow (for video) than a 12 cores and a decent replacement for the first-gen quads we still have in use.
Lack of eSATA and USB3 is disappointing though. However, expecting 12-core configurations to cost the same or "not-much-more" than current 8-core configurations is a bit, well, shortsighted. Those things are pricey.