Wow. 11 pages of comment already. I'll never get through them all. But the comment above is basically the same thought I had. I honestly didn't expect Apple to have much new to announce this year, but if they are pre-announcing this hardware, the clearly don't think they need to wait and use it to pad a boring keynote.
Good deal.
Yes, normal video cards can be supported in EFI, but only through EFI with a BIOS compatibility layer. Mac Pros have this (it's how they boot Windows), but OS X doesn't touch the BIOS compatibility layer because it has no reason to do so. That's why you can make out-of-the-box cards work in OS X, but only with some fairly ugly hacks in place. If Apple added support for any old video card, they could be opening up a support nightmare when people whine that some crapball bargain-bin card made their Mac crash.According to two locations I have found. It is possible for normal VC's to be supported in an EFI aware OS. Intel's PDF on EFI CSM, and Insanely Mac forum post #8.
Last I checked, a gallon of gas is more expensive than when the G5 was released. So is a gallon of milk. So is a loaf of bread.Uh, it's $200 more expensive than the old mac Pro which was $200 more expensive than the 970MP powerMac which was $500 more than the 970FX PowerMac. When you don't have an unlimited cash supply it adds up.
Does anyone know what the actual price difference is for what Intel charges for the 4 vs 8 core 2.8 ghz? I probably don't need the 8 cores, but I'd like to know if the base 8 core config is the best deal (like it was with the old MPs).
Underwhelming, to say the least.
I'm guessing the most happy campers are the guys who couldn't wait in October-November and bought a Mac Pro then. They must be saying: "Good!!! We didn't miss much by not waiting!"
EXACTLY. This means that Apple will AT LEAST release the following at MW:
Superthin subnote;
Updated MBPs and MBs;
Mac Nano (headless Mac to replace the Mac Mini);
New Studio Displays.
Wait and see...another nail in MS's and PC makers' coffins...![]()
You're the one posting repeatedly without even reading the thread or checking your facts thoroughly...you don't think you might be the one with your panties in a bunch and needing to chill?The quad is listed on the BTO page: One 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon (quad-core) [Subtract $500]
And 9to5 have officially lost the status of flawlessness they had, having predicted these updates to come at MacWorld.
Last I checked, a gallon of gas is more expensive than when the G5 was released. So is a gallon of milk. So is a loaf of bread.
What's your point?
Can't afford a shiny new Mac Pro? Get an old one from the refurb store. Or from eBay. Or get an iMac. Or get that cheap G5.
No one is forcing you to buy a new mac...
And Apple should revise the misleading "8-core standard" statement.
Yeah, they're awful. It's like an astronomer who predicts that an asteroid will hit the Earth around Tupelo at half past noon on December 13, 2012, when it actually hits 20 miles north of Poughkeepsie exactly one week earlier![]()
Wow, just in the time it took you to type this message, 6 more pages were added![]()
Last I checked, a gallon of gas is more expensive than when the G5 was released. So is a gallon of milk. So is a loaf of bread.
What's your point?
According to two locations I have found. It is possible for normal VC's to be supported in an EFI aware OS. Intel's PDF on EFI CSM, and Insanely Mac forum post #8.
AFAIK none of Intel's Server/Worstation class stuff supports DDR3. They have DDR3 support in the desktop class, but most places are telling people to avoid DDR3 till much faster speeds become available, as there isn't any difference in speed yet.
Yes, normal video cards can be supported in EFI, but only through EFI with a BIOS compatibility layer. Mac Pros have this (it's how they boot Windows), but OS X doesn't touch the BIOS compatibility layer because it has no reason to do so. That's why you can make out-of-the-box cards work in OS X, but only with some fairly ugly hacks in place. If Apple added support for any old video card, they could be opening up a support nightmare when people whine that some crapball bargain-bin card made their Mac crash.
There is no 8-core CPU: it's 2 4-core CPUs in separate sockets. The 4-core option is a single CPU. So Intel charge exactly 2x for the 2 CPUs.
Some of us are at work. And Apple should revise the misleading "8-core standard" statement. I probably wouldn't have gotten that impression othewise. Andif you look back at my post, it was amended. There's no need for rolly-eyes either. And I posted twice about it. Jeez. Some of us are human and make mistakes.