Rewrites Numbers for 64-bit/Still has 65,536 row limit.
(And what about bringing back pivot tables????)
True, technically it is possible but Numbers wouldn't be the right tool for more than that.
Rewrites Numbers for 64-bit/Still has 65,536 row limit.
(And what about bringing back pivot tables????)
Yes, it's good. But to be honest I think they planned this procedure (first complete rewrite and feature parity between OS X and iOS and then add back missing features step by step) anyway.
This has nothing to do with listening to customers, and everything to do with the fact that they were going to add that stuff back in all along. They're tearing these apps down and building them back up again so that integration between iOS and OSX is seamless.
Seamless... this whole transition itself is anything but seamless.![]()
Wait, the new Pages had WORD COUNT removed? Seriously?
You honestly believe Apple does not hire the best programers?
Does anyone know if there is still a screenplay template? I haven't used Pages since the update...
Scrivener is a powerful and flexible beast. Has layers of potential that people can use in so many different ways. I wish your wife every success with her novel.
This has nothing to do with listening to customers, and everything to do with the fact that they were going to add that stuff back in all along. They're tearing these apps down and building them back up again so that integration between iOS and OSX is seamless.
No, they are APOLOGIZING to customers. Something that also did not happen with Steve Jobs.![]()
Wasn't necessary when Steve ran the store. He knew what he was doing.
I keep getting surprised not enough people are seeing the real problem here:
If full iOS editability is the rule for iWork, it will never be as powerful as it used to be or as powerful as the Mac can make it. If Apple continues to base its decisions of iWork by being able to do everything you do on a Mac with a 4 year old iPhone, then the Mac will always be screwed, as well as Mac users.
Why isn't anyone seeing this? Why isn't anyone addressing the main issue that any software will be screwed if Mac to iOS feature parity is mandatory? It is not like the FCP X debacle, it is much worse. Imagine FCP X being bound to iOS and you will get the picture.![]()
haters gunna hate. i think its funny how the customer takes credit for the following things:
apps on iphone
updates to software
anything good apple does after someone complains about it
i guess that works for apple, but its obvious they were going to make those updates anyway!
whats new here is that apple is giving us heads up on what they are going to do...the first roadmap i've ever seen...
you guys should click the link and support this type of thing by marking "yes" for "yes this was helpful"
People comparing this to the Final Cut Pro X release are way of base - remember FCPX is an expensive high end tool, iWorks is now FREE - yes you are all bitching and whining about FREE apps.
In any case, for those who paid for iWorks'09 and you are whining - why? Just use the old versions.