Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Instead of destroying all those things, iPad should be depicted as absorbing all those things. iPad is a fusion of products and use cases, not a destroyer of all things physical or analogue.
Funny, that was kind of what I thought the ad was trying to depict.
 
Yes but which Presidential candidate’s supporters go for the nano-texture over the standard display? I must know the answer.
I mean I got the standard glossy M4 because I want the blacks to pop...plus, the nano texture doesn't extend to the borders of the glass screen (probably because of the camera). 🤔
 
Please wake up ! woken people ! This is one of the best ads recently. Perfectly shows what the message is ! Why do we allow this world to go crazy ???
 
Everyone’s entitled to an opinion. Sadly over sensitive types do not accept others opinions and force change the masses have to put up with.

Opinions may also keep things in place that the masses don’t like. The bad sensitivity in this thread seems to refer not to the sensitivity felt by the person who is so offended by the sensitivity of others but rather the initial sensitivity that so incensed them.
 
  • Love
Reactions: bousozoku
Celebrity: "I'm offended; this ad is distressing."
SPJ:"WGAF"

There's a lot of selective memory about Jobs, and people wish Cook was like Jobs in ways Jobs never was, but I will say this: Steve rarely listened to anyone outside his very small trusted circle. And he never apologized.

The man responsible for the Flower Power and Blue Dalmatian iMacs never acknowledged outside opinions on matters of taste. Cook could learn from that.
 
It’s not ‘opinions’, opinions are just that and used for discussion, the sad woke world we live in means the minority of over sensitive types who cry very loudly have a cause and effect, that takes away from the masses. Like Apple not placing this advert on TV. If Apple didn’t cancel the ad they would probably be concerned of the sensitive folks cancelling them, it’s the world we live in now.
Also people are so busy being overly sensitive they fail to see the fact the ad is doing its job, living in your head rent free. Ergo you’ll remember the product.

My ignore lost has grown wonderfully reading this thread.

You are easily the most sensitive person in the room.
 
It’s not ‘opinions’, opinions are just that and used for discussion, the sad woke world we live in means the minority of over sensitive types who cry very loudly have a cause and effect, that takes away from the masses. Like Apple not placing this advert on TV. If Apple didn’t cancel the ad they would probably be concerned of the sensitive folks cancelling them, it’s the world we live in now.
Also people are so busy being overly sensitive they fail to see the fact the ad is doing its job, living in your head rent free. Ergo you’ll remember the product.

My ignore lost has grown wonderfully reading this thread.
God I hope I'm on this list. 💅
 
Sure I'd be happy to make the easy argument that the digital paintbrush that just so happens to also operate the whole UI would never have made it to production on his watch. At the very, very least it could have possibly made it as far as being a real product but only as an app-specific accessory for use with the Notes app, etc.
He definitely wouldn't have liked the Apple Pencil! 'We'll use a stylus! (beat) Noooo! Who wants to a stylus? You have to get them and put them away and you lose them...yech!'
 
Apple's next AI advertisement😉:

Fallout-esque music is playing...

Tim Cook - confused - is laid off and replaced by newest Apple AI chip - now making company decisions, indistinguishable from his own.

Slogan: "Apple's most powerful decision maker is no longer an expensive, redundant, human being. Our newest AI chip is so good, our shareholders and customers can't tell the difference. Disconnect - it's in out DNA."
Here's another potential ad in 2025

2024 ipads being crushed.

New 2025 ipads revealed followed by commentary on how much better the 2025 ipads are compared to the 2024 ipads.

Then we see outrage on social media followed by an apology from apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomchr9
it did not cross my mind that creatives would find it offensive...

Creatives won't find it offensive. Hugh Grant did.

Actual creative people don't get offended by stuff like this because they know none of those tools are the reason they're creative. People who surround themselves with those tools to look creative get offended because they see it as an attack on the identity they're trying to present.
 
Creatives won't find it offensive. Hugh Grant did.

Actual creative people don't get offended by stuff like this because they know none of those tools are the reason they're creative. People who surround themselves with those tools to look creative get offended because they see it as an attack on the identity they're trying to present.
That's a pretty broad statetment based in zero fact.
 
Sure I'd be happy to make the easy argument that the digital paintbrush that just so happens to also operate the whole UI would never have made it to production on his watch. At the very, very least it could have possibly made it as far as being a real product but only as an app-specific accessory for use with the Notes app, etc.

Jobs would have green lighted Apple Pencil. It’s a perfect expression of his philosophy. Like a bicycle for your fingers. A painting and writing device that can emulate practically any type of brush or tip and has instant access to every color imaginable.

But yeah. You’re the Jobs expert I guess.

LOL
 
I doubt it's as simple as that.

But I keep thinking about last year's kerfuffle when the snowflakes got upset by Anheuser Busch sending a personalized can of beer to Dylan Mulvaney. It normally wouldn't affect anyone besides her social media followers, but some right wing influencers amplified it and shoved it down the throats of their followers.

So are the people who were outraged at Anheuser-Busch the same ones who are outraged now? Are the people who are shaking their heads that there's even a controversy the same in each case? I don't know.

Is it fair that outrage can make Anheuser-Bush issue an apology of sorts and put marketing executives on leave? Is it fair that an old story about shooting a young dog in the head or unsubstantiated claims of meeting a authoritarian dictator of a communist country (in a book that she's promoting) can torpedo the vice-presidential aims of a politician?

“Fair” is a bad metric for basically anything. Far too subjective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyGuyDEN
Since we're bickering over SJ hypotheticals, he also wouldn't have ever let a stylus be made for his beloved iPad product line either. In what is now a famous moment in Apple history, he damn near vomited at the idea of such a thing when discussing it during his keynote.

The Apple Pencil is for drawing and art for the most part. The stylus reference in his presentation was in regard to using that or your finger to navigate your device. Did you honestly not understand that? I’m just curious.
 
There's a lot of selective memory about Jobs, and people wish Cook was like Jobs in ways Jobs never was, but I will say this: Steve rarely listened to anyone outside his very small trusted circle. And he never apologized.

The man responsible for the Flower Power and Blue Dalmatian iMacs never acknowledged outside opinions on matters of taste. Cook could learn from that.

Agree. That’s a common trait in creative individuals. “I’m not really making it for you. I’m making it for ME.”

The problem with expecting Tim to adopt a similar approach is that to all outward appearances he doesn’t have much taste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomchr9
The Apple Pencil is for drawing and art for the most part. The stylus reference in his presentation was in regard to using that or your finger to navigate your device. Did you honestly not understand that? I’m just curious.

He understands. I’ve explained it twice now. He just loves his bad analogy so much he isn’t willing to let it die the ignominious death it deserves.
 
The Apple Pencil is for drawing and art for the most part. The stylus reference in his presentation was in regard to using that or your finger to navigate your device. Did you honestly not understand that? I’m just curious.
I commented on this as well. I am sure he could have eventually seen the need for one but he would NOT have shipped something that stuck out of the damn Lightning port. #fail
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
I think you should avoid television and film, just to be on the safe side.
Yes, thanks for the advice. To be fair I already do pretty much - I've just come back from spending my Friday evening not watching a film, but sitting in a Cathedral listening to one of the best choirs in the world sing 16th century polyphony for 2 hours.

What many of you can't see is that ultimately the reason Apple pulled this is because it was a poor ad which risked alienating one of their core markets: people like me (traditional professional musicians/artists) are hugely important to Apple. A few years ago the rumours were that the needs of how Jacob Collier used Logic were driving some of Apple's Mac Pro design decisions. As another example, while the choir I've just seen were still reading from paper, that definitely puts them in the minority of the performers in concerts I've attended recently - more and more musicians are using the 13-inch iPads as substitutes for paper music in concerts (myself included) - as an organist it allows for layers with different markings/registrations for different venues (which used to be accomplished with fiddly post-it tapes) or orchestras can store layers with different interpretations/bowings of the same piece for use with different conductors. It eliminates the need for annoying page turns, etc. It may not be a romantic or inherently creative use of the iPad, but at the moment Apple is the default that a musician goes to. Apple doesn't want to upset that cart.
 
Is it fair that outrage can make Anheuser-Bush issue an apology of sorts and put marketing executives on leave? Is it fair that an old story about shooting a young dog in the head or unsubstantiated claims of meeting a authoritarian dictator of a communist country (in a book that she's promoting) can torpedo the vice-presidential aims of a politician?
Considering that both of those things literally exist within the context of convincing a well-defined "base" to vote your way (either with their wallets, in the beer context, or with their actual votes, in the political one) - then yes, it is absolutely fair. You live by the sword, you die by that same sword.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.