Yes! But you might wanna check out ScummVM, that's what I use to play Space QuestDoes this mean I can play King's Quest on my iPad?!
Strategic Conquest.Can't wait to run System 7 again so I can play Escape Velocity and all the other Ambrosia Shareware I never paid for as a kid.
Without JIT I can't see it being usable at all.
It seems to run Windows XP, Windows 7 and several Linux distros fine enough. That’s useful for many people.Without JIT I can't see it being usable at all.
This just seems more like them wining about lack of JIT than anything else to me. If it was so useless, then how come they even bothered trying to submit it, and how come they took the time to replace JIT? I’ve heard that XP and 7 run fine, and various Linux distros as well. 10 and 11 do run, but are a bit slow from what I’ve heard. But running a bit slow doesn’t necessarily make it useless.They specifically said it wasn't worth fighting with App Review to get it approved because of the poor performance of the app without JIT. So it really does seem to just be a proof of concept.
will this work with a free account as well? because I think I did that …Not if you sign it with your own Dev Account.
I believe so. You should be able to clone the GitRepo in Xcode and then sign it as yourself. Then you should be good for a year (Dev access) as opposed to a week.will this work with a free account as well? because I think I did that …
iPad does not have JIT support. JIT stands for Just In Timedebugging.
While iPadOS and macOS run on the same processor architecture and share the same core codebase, JiT and similar virtualization features are part of macOS and are not included in iPadOS.
I don't quite understand Apple not allowing JIT support. The same information on my Mac is on my iPad so if the Mac is vulnerable because of JIT support... I would be fine if Apple provided a warning that we have to accept to have JIT support. UTM SE with Windows 7 is soooooo slow. It is a shame... We got this far though, wonder how much longer until Apple allows JIT support.
FYI, increasing the # of cores exposed by the emulator and increasing the size of the JIT cache in UTM settings can make a huge difference in the performance of an emulated x86 VM. It's still going to be pretty damn slow, though.Windows 10 X64 is barely usable on my M3 Max MacbookPro - (my iPad Pro might actually run it a bit faster due to the M4)
Emulation with JIT isn't necessary to run a Linux distro, but virtualization support is. There are ARM versions of many popular linux distros. Unfortunately Apple removed virtualization support from iOS.Shame Apple is so obtuse about JIT. Something like this would be incredible for having quick and dirty access to a linux terminal on the go.
As I can connect my iMac’s Magic Keyboard to my iPhone, can the keyboard work on the emulated Windows 7 in UTM SE?Windows XP runs well - Windows 7 at acceptable speed
This is the whole issue. Mac Mini m2 has virtualisation and runs windows 11 extremely well in UTM. It shocked me how well.![]()
I have a few questions. When running on an Apple M series processor on iPadOS:
There's no virtualization restriction so it's not just emulation, right? So it's not pure emulation but hardware virtualization too?
Does running it on an iPad with the specs mentioned above, does it have JIT support (not sure what that is or how it affects performance).
I'm having a hard time completing the install. It's kind of complicated (for me). Any tips that would help? Also, any recommendations for the easiest, most secure way to download Windows 11 for Arm? I'd rather not go the Windows Insider Preview route.
Any advice and knowledge on the matter is appreciated.
Thanks!
It seems to run Windows XP, Windows 7 and several Linux distros fine enough. That’s useful for many people.
given they took an effort to carve out the virtualization code in iPadOS, I fear it will not come backThis is the whole issue. Mac Mini m2 has virtualisation and runs windows 11 extremely well in UTM. It shocked me how well.
iPad Pro m2 has had virtualisation blocked since ios15ish out of spite. That, and the lack of JIT, makes UTM SE dog slow, and there is no way to get JIT running stably currently on iOS17 (altjit and jitterbug are kind of broken)
Apple, just let us have virtualisation on a iPad Pro device, even if we are stuck with a Fisher Price OS.
My windows 7 UTM used to run pretty well on iPad Pro UTM when Altjit worked. I was even playing Sim City 3000 on it! Loading the same image on UTM SE and it’s been like 10 minutes and still booting.
Just let our iPad Pro be pro.
View attachment 2397411
you are right - but it also makes the VMs more unstable. At the end single core performance is what you are looking for.FYI, increasing the # of cores exposed by the emulator and increasing the size of the JIT cache in UTM settings can make a huge difference in the performance of an emulated x86 VM. It's still going to be pretty damn slow, though.
and unfortunately the topic is too technical for the EU - so no help from that side to be expectedgiven they took an effort to carve out the virtualization code in iPadOS, I fear it will not come back
JIT isn't part of MacOS. Its a feature of QEMU, which UTM builds on.
Any chance you could chuck over the windows 98 UTM fileWindows 98 seems to run about as well as my first Celeron 400 PC.